Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEFAMATION -- LIBEL AND SLANDER [Florida Law - FReepers Heed]
Florida Bar Association ^

Posted on 10/24/2003 10:14:40 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine

Edited on 10/24/2003 12:02:17 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 1,761-1,774 next last
To: Catspaw; ckca
>>>>Why would you think this is only about Michael Schiavo? Plenty of cases have been discussed here, some much more heated than the Schiavo case (I'm thinking Elian)....Elizabeth Smart, the Westerfields, the Christines, Kobe, Scott Peterson, with many more to come.

I can't speak specifically for CKCA; but I have direct reason to suspect that members or affiliates of Michael Schiavo's legal team are on this board.

So this is why I think it is about the Michael Schiavo case.
361 posted on 10/24/2003 12:41:10 PM PDT by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Go find your own posting monkey.

You lied.

That is not news.

362 posted on 10/24/2003 12:41:46 PM PDT by harrowup (So perfect I'm naturally humble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
see post 341
363 posted on 10/24/2003 12:41:59 PM PDT by ckca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: harrowup
Actually, I'm backing off my theory of intimidation. It's closer to Godwin's rule. When a person loses in an iternet discussion so badly that he threatens (indirectly) lawsuits, he is admitting defeat and the discussion is over. Pitiful. Sad.
364 posted on 10/24/2003 12:42:02 PM PDT by Warren_Piece (Truth Hits Everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: ckca; Chancellor Palpatine; Jim Robinson
I think Jim's words (see post #251) and CP's attempt to 'protect (my assessment of CP's motive) should be heeded by all who value this forum.
365 posted on 10/24/2003 12:42:24 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece
When a person loses in an iternet discussion so badly that he threatens (indirectly) lawsuits, he is admitting defeat and the discussion is over. Pitiful. Sad.

Does that become before or after they accuse of being a Nazi?

366 posted on 10/24/2003 12:45:14 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
I can't speak specifically for CKCA; but I have direct reason to suspect that members or affiliates of Michael Schiavo's legal team are on this board.

More likely that they're here lurking, just gathering posts and screen names.

367 posted on 10/24/2003 12:45:17 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
That didn't answer my question. Answer the question.
368 posted on 10/24/2003 12:45:17 PM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
generic drug product liability.

Even if you prove that you didn't make the pill that caused the problem, you're still liable for a percentage of the damages equal to your market share.
369 posted on 10/24/2003 12:45:17 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: TheAngryClam
How different is that, really, from all those people who think that after the feeding tube was reinserted and Terri Schiavo got better it was because they had prayed?

If you see no difference between thousands of people of faith unified in a common prayer to save a woman's life and one man who tries to crash an airplane with his imagination, and believes that God personally warned him his mental powers are so mighty they can defy gravity, I'd never be able to explain it to you.

I'm sure many people have called us all whackjobs merely because we believe in God. I doubt any of us have threatened to sue someone for damaging our reputations because of it.

370 posted on 10/24/2003 12:45:17 PM PDT by lonevoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
PING
371 posted on 10/24/2003 12:45:17 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (You may forget the one with whom you have laughed, but never the one with whom you have wept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: ckca; Chancellor Palpatine
"Palpatine used to post under the screen name One_Particular_Harbour"

That you, OPH?! Welcome back...MUD

372 posted on 10/24/2003 12:46:02 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: harrowup
Tell me my lie, oh great one, how I lied. You wanted some links to plaintiffs cases. i gave you some, but don't feel like cranking out links for you all die. And you never answered my question about the discovery threat. What, pray tell, are you wanting to discover on me, and what are you suing me for? I'm all ears.
373 posted on 10/24/2003 12:46:02 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
That didn't answer my question. Answer the question.

Sue me.

374 posted on 10/24/2003 12:46:03 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
>>>What was the FReeper name of this individual?

I'm not releasing that yet. That could be defamation (sp?) too.
375 posted on 10/24/2003 12:46:24 PM PDT by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
Chancellor Palpatine is a serial blowhard.
376 posted on 10/24/2003 12:46:57 PM PDT by harrowup (So perfect I'm naturally humble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: harrowup
What does that make you? Have you read your posts on this thread? Charming!
377 posted on 10/24/2003 12:47:46 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (You may forget the one with whom you have laughed, but never the one with whom you have wept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
"I have direct reason to suspect that members or affiliates of Michael Schiavo's legal team are on this board."

How come?!

FReegards...MUD

378 posted on 10/24/2003 12:47:52 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; Calpernia
bookmark

Thanks Poohbah.
379 posted on 10/24/2003 12:48:02 PM PDT by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece
I think that is Murphy's law:

Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse.

Nature always sides with the hidden flaw.

The further you are in advance of your own positions, the more likely your artillery will shoot short.

380 posted on 10/24/2003 12:48:02 PM PDT by Porterville (American First, Human being Second; liberal your derivative lifestyle will never be normalized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 1,761-1,774 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson