Skip to comments.
75,000-Year-Old Neanderthal Woman's Facial Reconstruction Sheds New Light on Our Archaic Human Ancestors
The Debrief ^
| May 3, 2024
| CHRISSY NEWTON
Posted on 05/03/2024 11:17:40 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: Sacajaweau
41
posted on
05/03/2024 12:11:48 PM PDT
by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
To: ganeemead
Fascinating video. I learned a lot from it. Thanks for posting it.
42
posted on
05/03/2024 12:14:49 PM PDT
by
Blennos
( Byaasearepeat itnbelow.)
To: Red Badger
Don’t be too hasty. I’m sure she was fine during prom.
43
posted on
05/03/2024 12:15:53 PM PDT
by
USAF1985
(Joe McCarthy is a hero...he was absolutely, 100% correct! (Let’s go Brandon!))
To: woodbutcher1963
Would Laz hit it And there it is, only took 36 posts?
A little slower than usual tho...
Well? Laz? We're waiting!!!!!
44
posted on
05/03/2024 12:16:09 PM PDT
by
China Clipper
( Animals? I love animals. See? There's one there, right next to the potatoes!)
To: Jim W N
There has yet yo be verifiable and sound scientific evidence of man existing beyond around 6000 years ago.Did you come to that conclusion when drawing in your creationist coloring books? Pathetic.
To: Red Badger
Looks like Nancy Peoosi when she was able to close her eyes before all the Botox.
To: Red Badger
It’d have to be sooooo past closin’ time...
47
posted on
05/03/2024 12:19:18 PM PDT
by
PLMerite
("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest )
To: Red Badger
Looks like a South American/ American Southwest Indian.
To: rexthecat
Did you come to that conclusion when drawing in your creationist coloring books? Pathetic. You call that an argument or a refutation? Pathetic.
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse
Romans 1:20.
49
posted on
05/03/2024 12:20:28 PM PDT
by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: Red Badger
doesn’t look anything like her.
they got the chin all wrong.
50
posted on
05/03/2024 12:20:46 PM PDT
by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
To: COBOL2Java
“Frank Burns Eats Worms”
Boy oh boy, what a great character.
Great actor to pull it off too.
That show had it all.
51
posted on
05/03/2024 12:21:18 PM PDT
by
redshawk
( I want my red balloon. https://youtu.be/VexKSRKoWQY)
To: Red Badger
Kamala?
To: George J. Jetso
Greg Gutfeld last night mentioned this Neanderthal woman news item, then put up a photo of Nancy Pelosi.
To: Red Badger
We still have that Al Greene guy slinking around, the neanderthals are not extinct.
54
posted on
05/03/2024 12:26:58 PM PDT
by
doorgunner69
(When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty)
To: Red Badger
They got the ears and lips all wrong ... or how could they know what the soft tissue looked like?
55
posted on
05/03/2024 12:29:51 PM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: Red Badger
Interesting.
Years ago I wondered how people would respond if they somehow could be accurately told the date and time of their eventual deaths?
Would they resignedly accept their fates, become despondent and take their own lives, or go insane?
The variety made me rethink if our governments are withholding real UFO information out of real fear of the responses people would make?
56
posted on
05/03/2024 12:32:03 PM PDT
by
desertsolitaire
(Doomed to be Cassandra-like?)
To: Jonty30
I tend to lean towards the idea that Neanderthals just may have been a type of ape. It’s eye sockets and skull placement on the spinal column makes it more likely that it was an ape than human. The lack of intermediary forms suggests no overlaps with humans.
—
Human DNA would indicate otherwise, as would Denisovian, also found in human DNA. Its called interbreeding.
57
posted on
05/03/2024 12:33:58 PM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: Red Badger
These things used to be called “artists impression” when there were no facts or evidence supporting the conclusion.
58
posted on
05/03/2024 12:34:41 PM PDT
by
T. Rustin Noone
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: desertsolitaire
Although I no longer have a link to it, numerous Neanderthal faces were found drawn on a cave floor. So we do know what they looked like generally.
59
posted on
05/03/2024 12:35:57 PM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: ganeemead
we are not related to them, other than by similar design
—
Other than the Neanderthal DNA found in Homo sapiens sapiens DNA
60
posted on
05/03/2024 12:37:37 PM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson