New JAMA paper show Ivermectin blows the COVID vaccines out of the water

substack.com ^ | 2/23/2022 | Steve Kirsch

[ransomnote]

PING

[PMAS]

*

[metmom]

Imagine that……

[no-to-illegals]

A government agency behaves normally

[Eleutheria5]

JAMA sounds a lot like MAGA. They must be right-wing extremists./s

[Skwor]

Read the conclusion, they literally lie and misrepresent the results. very politicized Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, ivermectin treatment during early illness did not prevent progression to severe disease. The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.

[Little Ray]

In before the Vax Cultists.

[Mygirlsmom]

It was just a short time ago that LSM was blasting this study out as news that EyeFurMuckTon didn’t work

[know.your.why]

[fuzzylogic]

...so tired of the shot being called a vaccine. It seems to just get worse by the day.

Time to get my 4th shot ;p

Yet people still will. Unreal.

[Equine1952]

There’s only one way to try this, oh never mind. Been there did it, so did the wife. Only thing I really notice now. Apples and carrots always look good. 🤔

[bray]

My wife and I just cured it with IVM and went very well. No vax.

[Stosh]

They can get away with the statement that “The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19” because given the relatively small sample size in the study the magnitude of the beneficial effects of ivermectin was insufficient to provide an effect at the 95% confidence level normally required to make a firm conclusion in such studies.

Nonetheless, the study does indicate a clear potential benefit to using ivermectin, and given that the drug is almost entirely harmless if properly prescribed, the absence of results reaching a particular (basically arbitrary) level of statistical credibility should hardly be a reason to prohibit its use.

[sauropod]

Review

[Skwor]

I agree, just pointing out how utterly evil and dishonest science and research is today. ALL of it is only as good as the highest bidder or biggest government threat.

[Skwor]

Should add I think the small sample size was chosen to guarantee a failed result because of the very requirement of 95% statistical modeling required.

[Stosh]

I would not be at all surprised if you were exactly correct in that assessment.

[Osage Orange]

Ummmmm...considering GOV Agencies...I'd say the exact opposite.

Surprise "A government agency behaves abnormally"

[bagster]

***GRUDGE PING***