Skip to comments.
All 3 COVID-19 vaccines still produce strong immune response 8 months later, new study finds
ABC News ^
| 15 October 2021
| Sony Salzman
Posted on 10/16/2021 1:41:50 AM PDT by blueplum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: iontheball
Pearson Sharp on OANN has an editorial with film footage of Faucci from 2017 and 2019 talking about the China virus outbreak.
This "pandemic" was a planned trial run to thin the herd for the NWO and get sheeple ready for their mark.
21
posted on
10/16/2021 4:50:51 AM PDT
by
MikeSteelBe
(The South will be in the right in the next war of Northern aggression.)
To: blueplum
Yeah, we can talk how effective they are by the very few breakthrough cases and the lack of variants.
22
posted on
10/16/2021 5:03:16 AM PDT
by
jacknhoo
( Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: blueplum
The article lost all credibility and interest for me when I noticed it was sourced from a mainstream media source.
23
posted on
10/16/2021 5:10:33 AM PDT
by
The Duke
(Search for 'Sydney Ducks' and understand what is needed.)
To: blueplum
Lie enough, and pretty soon everyone’s default setting is to assume you are just lying again.
Everyone tried to warn you Pfizer shills...
To: Robert DeLong
Total BS is what the MSM relies on, they’re scared to death of facts.
25
posted on
10/16/2021 5:14:38 AM PDT
by
maddog55
(The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
To: ReaganGeneration2
So, apparently this study is a letter to the NEJM, you have to email Dr. Barouch to get the actual study!
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2115596
So what is the methodology for choosing subjects? What are the ages? Had they had covid previously? What is the statistical significance/p value?
Why don’t they put the whole study online as a preprint so it can be evaluated and commented on like other studies?
What a joke.
To: blueplum
27
posted on
10/16/2021 5:22:36 AM PDT
by
MarMema
To: Robert DeLong
Let's assume for the sake of argument that the article is true.
That raises a question: why booster shots?
We all know the answer to that question, right?
28
posted on
10/16/2021 5:24:47 AM PDT
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: blueplum
29
posted on
10/16/2021 5:30:32 AM PDT
by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: blueplum
but how many of the vaccinated actually had covid and the natural immunity too?
30
posted on
10/16/2021 5:34:26 AM PDT
by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something)
To: blueplum
Every other drug ad on TV has 20 seconds of disclaimers and warnings.
31
posted on
10/16/2021 5:37:55 AM PDT
by
P.O.E.
To: meangene
"Supported by
Janssen Vaccines and Prevention; a grant (CA260476, to Dr. Barouch) from the
National Institutes of Health; the
Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness; the
Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard; a grant (to Dr. Barouch) from the
Musk Foundation; a grant (HD000849, to Dr. Collier) from the
Reproductive Scientist Development Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the
Burroughs Wellcome Fund; a grant (TR002541, to Dr. Hacker) from the
Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center; and a fellowship from the
Hanna H. Gray Fellows Program from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and an award from the
Postdoctoral Enrichment Program of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund (both to Dr. Martinez)."
Bolding is mine.
32
posted on
10/16/2021 5:38:01 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(You are not a horse, you are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it.)
To: Robert DeLong
Notwithstanding 70% of new cases are among the vaxxed.
33
posted on
10/16/2021 5:59:04 AM PDT
by
Louis Foxwell
(This is what you get when you put criminals in charge.)
To: blueplum
Every other study is claiming just the opposite.
The jab decimates the immune system.
34
posted on
10/16/2021 6:09:47 AM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: blueplum
Yawn. Total lie. They’re deadly poisons, not “vaccines”.
To: blueplum
36
posted on
10/16/2021 6:26:21 AM PDT
by
wild74
To: blueplum
If these results are accurate, they still don’t address the real world scenario where the s protein is different due to viral mutations. They held the protein artificially constant.
Not a very practical scientific test.
37
posted on
10/16/2021 6:34:17 AM PDT
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Robert DeLong
Absolute horse dung! Massive out breaks over the summer and now Israel getting ready to offer its 4th booster! I am betting the people paying for this study got exactly what they wanted. Utter rubbish...
38
posted on
10/16/2021 7:02:32 AM PDT
by
sarge83
To: blueplum
Not the sterilizing pandemic ender that was hoped for so far, but not too shabby. Not too shabby at all:
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status
39
posted on
10/16/2021 7:03:32 AM PDT
by
phoneman08
(qwiyrqweopigradfdz oncmccRthym,.dadfjl,dz )
To: maddog55
They may be scared of facts, but more likely they have an agenda to push. After all, they are being paid by the left and the elites to push the BS.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson