Posted on 07/03/2021 6:11:50 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
It used to be the proof is in the pudding.
DDG, not google. Gives real data, not supressed misinformation. And blows holes in YOUR disinformation.
Click:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=india+ivermectin&t=brave&df=m&ia=web
Sample:
“This is what happened to cases in the areas that chose Ivermectin:
Delhi : ¯ 97% [28,395 to 956]
Uttar Pradesh: ¯ 95% [37,944 to 2,014]
Goa: ¯ 85% [4195 to 645]
Karnataka: ¯ 60% [50,112 to 20,378]
Uttarakhand: ¯ 87% [9,642 to 1,226]
Observe what happened to those areas that DID NOT choose Ivermectin:
Tamil Nadu 173% [10,986 to 30,016]
Odisha 50% [4,761 to 7,148]
Assam 240% [1,651 to 5,613]
Arunachal Pradesh 656% [ 61 to 461]
Tripura 828% [92 to 854]”
Come to think of it, the lockdowns didn’t work so well either.
RE: In India, the falloff in cases happened in both the states that embraced Ivermectin (Delhi) and the states that rejected Ivermectin (Tamil-Nadu).
Actually, I would say that VACCINES AND/OR IVERMECTIN play more of a part than lockdowns.
Well, this article’s author disagrees with you. ( May 21,2021 )
SEE HERE:
EXCERPT:
Tamil Nadu had the infamous distinction of leading India in new COVID-19 infections as of May 18, 2021.
“With 33,059 cases reported in the last 24 hours, Tamil Nadu (TN) is leading the state list,” reported an article published in the Business Standard. “May 19 was to be worse with 34,875 new infections, again with the dubious distinction of being number one in India.”
The Indian Express reported yet a further daily record increase to 35,579 of new TN infections as of May 20. Tamil Nadu has outlawed Ivermectin use for COVID, which may explain their horrific rise in new COVID infections.
Meanwhile, cases in Delhi continue to fall as they douse their COVID flame with Ivermectin. As of May 19, 2021, Delhi’s infections had plunged 87% from 28,395 on April 20 - when they began using Ivermectin - to just 3,846.
They began using Ivermectin when AIIMS announced adding Ivermectin to COVID-19 outpatient treatment, something my group, C19, has been calling for in the US since Dr. George Fareed, Dr. Peter McCullough, and Dr. Harvey Risch testified on November 19, 2020, to the US Senate. The trio advocated early outpatient treatment of the type Dr. Fareed and his associate Dr. Brian Tyson have used to save almost 6000 patients in California’s Imperial Valley.
[SNIP]
The states of Goa, Uttarakhand, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu agreed to adopt Ivermectin. Goa led the way on May 10 with the announcement that every man and woman over 18 would receive 12 mg of Ivermectin daily for five days irrespective of COVID status. The world was finally moving in the right direction. Thank God!
Thank God, until an atheist and new Chief Minister, MK Stalin, took power on May 7, 2021, in Tamil Nadu and proclaimed that Remdesivir would replace Ivermectin as their drug of choice. Now Tamil Nadu’s cases are diverging from the states that chose Ivermectin.
Goa’s cases have dropped 62% in just nine days since announcing the Ivermectin policy - from 3124 down to 1204. The other Indian Ivermectin states have also enjoyed a substantial decrease in new infections. By contrast, Tamil’s citizens face an ascending escalator of cases bringing untold misery and mortality to this southern Indian community, which begs the question - When will Tamil Nadu hear the message that Ivermectin saves lives? When will the rest of humanity take heed?
________________________
And here is a more recent result in Tamil Nadu (Today’s news ):
Tamil Nadu coronavirus update: State records 4,013 new cases, 115 deaths
[EXCERPT]
“We received 1,57,76,550 vaccines of which we have vaccinated 1,52,00,785 till date and 6,41,220 doses are in stock. Despite the impact of virus on Tamil Nadu reducing, the number of testing of RT-PCR samples remained high,”
Now, compare this to Ivermectin-friendly Uttar Pradesh:
Uttar Pradesh reports 133 Covid-19 cases, one fatality
No fresh case was reported from 24 districts of the state, whereas 49 districts report new cases in single digits.
TAMIL NADU’s POPULATION: 72 Million
UTTAR PRADESH’s POPULATION: Over 200 Million
One state did not use Ivermectin, one state did.
Vaccination? Uttar Pradesh has one of the LOWEST vaccination rates:
https://in.news.yahoo.com/vaccine-politics-peaks-uttar-pradeshs-090300891.html
AS for lockdowns... there are studies that show that they did more harm than good. See here:
https://nypost.com/2021/03/22/the-data-shows-lockdowns-end-more-lives-than-they-save/
And then there’s the comparison of lockdowns in different places versus those that did not. See here:
and here:
https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-dont-prevent-coronavirus-spread/
The evidence does not exactly fit your theory.
RE: It’s not the vaccines or Ivermectin that did it in India. It’s the lockdowns. I hate it but it’s true.
I direct you to this article with authors who actually STUDIED the effect of lockdowns on some of the most LAW ABIDING countries in the world
https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-dont-prevent-coronavirus-spread/
and here:
https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-do-not-control-the-coronavirus-the-evidence/
READ IT IN FULL.
Here is their conclusion:
What the new study from Northern Jutland shows is that an extreme form of lockdown didn’t work in one of the most law-abiding societies in the world. Why, then, should we expect lockdowns to be effective anywhere else?
Have an illuminated holy family statue of Joseph and Mary holding baby Jesus and a sign reading FOR AMERICA PRAY THE ROSARY facing the state highway which is our access and fronts our property lighted by red, white, and blue led lights.Plus have a lighted flag on pole close by.
When I say my daily rosary I begin it by singing this
“Dear Lady of Fatima I come on bended knee/ to beg your intercession to help save our coun-try / I also include a prayer for the success for the use of Intervectin which is a low cost and available drug which is being used by countries in asia and africa.
One can take IVM prophylactically. That strikes me as a preventative. (Prevent = come before)
Also during the onset of symptoms one can take IVM to prevent death or other covid consequences.
Can you articulate what it is you expect from a *preventative*?
Vaccine distribution is reasonably fast, 350 million doses given as of now. The population size though makes that still a lower percentage than many other countries but there's nothing much that can be done about it. The absolute numbers dwarf almost all other countries and daily vaccinations are between 4-6 million.
I think the preventive part is for the same reason it is a treatment...
It stops continued replication in an infected person and then reduces it...by the same dynamics, it prevents the spread of the bug if the person already has it in the system when the bug is introduced...”nip it in the bud” .
To start with that’s not the case. Look at the European countries to US. But again, those stats are incredibly unreliable.
No vaccine at all is necessary, let alone all the damage that the vaccines are doing. But we have a corrupt effort to stop all safe, cheap and effective drugs and treatments. Exhibit A is Ivermectin, which is the story of India, btw.
Watch this Joe Rogan episode and then come back trying to tell me all this vaccine crap is necessary and there haven’t been massive crimes against humanity taking place.
https://banned.video/watch?id=60e1553403320c405f9b5914
At a time when India is seeing a dip in its tally of new cases every day, the revised guidelines have also dropped drugs such as hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc and multivitamins, that were earlier prescribed by doctors to treat asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic Covid-19 patients.
In asymptomatic cases, the revised guidelines have said no medication is required. In the case of mildly symptomatic patients, self-monitoring for fever, breathlessness and oxygen saturation (SpO2) have been recommended.
Ivermectin if very effective as a preventative also. It can and should be given to those at high risk as a prophylactic.
Why did India stop recommending Ivermectin?
NAC Interesting.
But it has to be administered in an I.V. drip
or a shot, and it does not appear to be a prophylactic.
Ivermectin can be taken by anyone orally outside a clinical setting, and is a proven prophylactic, as well as useful for early treatment.
Makes no sense
Which "revised guidelines" for asymptomatic cases?
Also, there are stories out there saying they were wrong about asymptomatic cases ever being an issue 9just part of the original scare stories.
India had a really good record going into the regime change which immediately stopped the Iver/HCQ and went all "Jab Crazy" as the main plan - shortly thereafter, the cases started rising and they were also showing "streets littered with dead bodies - even though they never reached our percentages.
Seems like them 'revised guidelines" are the same as what we were doing , which killed a lot of people early on - don't medicate until one has to be hospitalized - when they know there are cheap drugs available that can help stop the progression....One might be curious enough to ask why they relax therapies even as they push for more jabs - of an experimental concoction.
4 am. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.