Q Anon: 12/16/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.199, Q Day 780

qmap.pub ^ | 12/16/19 | FReepers, vanity

[RitaOK]

My viewing of the Barr interview came on HANNITY. The full interview airs tomorrow on Martha’s program. There may run another teaser on Ingraham, but idk. So far, no links yet.

[grey_whiskers]

Joel Pollak at Breitbart goes one better. The Constitution says "The Senate shall have sole power to try all cases of Impeachment."

Which means, they can call the Senate, and the Chief Justice, and acquit -- since there are no articles there.

And there's not a thing in this world or the next, the Dems can do to stop it.

[kallisti]

Nancy Pelosi Declares: “the senate rules are unfair” – “when rules become fair we will send articles”

In all fairness, what else do you think the mad Red Queen would say?

[Right-wing Librarian]

Speculating....

Favorable ruling for POTUS:

Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito

Unfavorable ruling for POTUS:

Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Ginsburg

Deciding vote? Roberts

[blu]

grey, c’mon. We no longer do Mexican stand-offs, the lib’s have declared them raaayyycist!!

[Empireoftheatom48]

Something from our side better happen and soon. Not just words. God knows something must happen to these evil people. Are we going to let them get away with this total crap?

[bitt]

Martha’s interview with Barr is now tomorrow

Hannity showed preview:

Barr said “broader scope for Durham than Horowitz - he’s looking at both private actors and govt departments..

not just FISA, but all the conduct before and after the election”

[Steve Van Doorn]

I think the Dems are playing a fast one on us. Can someone clarify/confirm what I'm reading
The dems passed an agreement on articles. They didn't pass the impeachment vote
QUESTION: On Agreeing to Article II of the Resolution
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/index.asp

This might be why the Dems are not sending this to the Senate. It hasn't passed.

[RitaOK]

I agree.

Even though it’s made clear the Senate would Acquit Trump, that totally Fails to correct the House of Representatives unjust action against a sitting president in the Absence of a crime or misdemeanor.

That action is a danger to the Republic and needs to be Reversed.

This Supreme Court option may be behind Pelosi’s reluctance to send Articles over to the Senate just now. I’m sure she knows options open to the POTUS.

[grey_whiskers]

grey, c’mon. We no longer do Mexican stand-offs, the lib’s have declared them raaayyycist!!

[grey_whiskers]

[MileHi]

Time to buzz off

[Pelham]

👍

[Bob Ireland]

***7:53 CST TRUMP is impeached***

Hold fast!

[RitaOK]

I thought I heard about a vote in the morning to send the Articles over to the Senate, however, Pelosi announced tonight that vote to Send will be Delayed.

Seems she insists on knowing the rules of the Senate, first. See story on that at TCTH. She said something about wanting “ to know the Arena beforehand “. Like she has any say???? Ha. Maybe not, right?

[RitaOK]

Amen, dear friend.

[defconw]

Holy Carp! Prayers up!

[SaxxonWoods]

Willie and Joe!

[RitaOK]

That’s always the question. Roberts.

Unless, ..... Roberts encumbrances have at last been removed (Obama/Soros)?

[Bob Ireland]

***Amen, dear friend***

The fat lady has not sung yet!