Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Viral Math Problem
New York Post ^ | August 1, 2019 | Frank Miles

Posted on 08/01/2019 4:58:47 AM PDT by Renkluaf

“8÷2(2+2).” Can you solve this math problem? The equation went viral online this week on Twitter causing major confusion over the right answer. Mathematicians and physicists went nuts about it. Mike Breen, the Public Awareness Officer for the American Mathematical Society, told popular Mechanics: “The way it’s written, it’s ambiguous. In math, a lot of times there are ambiguities. Mathematicians try to make rules as precise as possible.” Depending on where in the world you learned math, as Mashable reported, determines how you can solve the problem.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Education; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: bedmas; bodmas; math; mathproblem; mydearauntsusie; pemdas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last
To: Renkluaf

"The Question is Moot!"

121 posted on 08/01/2019 8:14:59 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

1


122 posted on 08/01/2019 8:17:41 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Prov 24: Do not fret because of evildoers. Do not associate with those given to change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n

Of course this isn’t math. This is convention. We have conventions on how to write these things just like we have conventions on how to spell stuff. But still, there are different conventions. Some people spell it as ‘gray’ and others as ‘grey.’ We still understand what’s going on. For me, I would write this more explicitly so that there is no confusion. Like this:
8/(2*(2+2)), if that’s what you are trying to do. That way no one will get it wrong.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/math/a28569610/viral-math-problem-2019-solved/


123 posted on 08/01/2019 8:21:12 AM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

Wrong.

See posts 42 and 49. I trust the mathematicians at Wolfram Alpha over a random FReeper (no offense intended).


124 posted on 08/01/2019 8:24:36 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Gil4
I was trained to solve the parenthetical parts of an equation first and the 2(2+2) would be solved as a single unit. Any elements separated by a symbol are then considered and dealt with.

Sal Khan of Khan Academy and MIT was trained the same way IIRC.

125 posted on 08/01/2019 8:25:57 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
Parentheses first, then multiplication, then division.

No.. Multiplication and division are on the same level, and it goes left to right.

The answer is 16.

126 posted on 08/01/2019 8:26:22 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin

created with the intent to cause “viral”


127 posted on 08/01/2019 8:26:26 AM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gil4

8 ÷ 2(2+2) is not the same notation as 8 ÷ 2 * (2+2).


128 posted on 08/01/2019 8:29:37 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: central_va

really???


129 posted on 08/01/2019 8:30:24 AM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Yes, really.


130 posted on 08/01/2019 8:31:55 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

52 is a good argument... same equation... written differently, how do you explain the answer?


131 posted on 08/01/2019 8:32:13 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

52 implies a second set of () or []. In other words, the equation in 52 would be written 8/[2(2+2)] or 8/(2(2+2)).

As I point out in post 42, the problem is poorly written. It is akin to how you would pronounce POLISH.


132 posted on 08/01/2019 8:36:00 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

I think we both mean post 53, lol.


133 posted on 08/01/2019 8:37:11 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r; central_va

Fyi, the poster on 53 has a different answer on 61


134 posted on 08/01/2019 8:39:10 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

first, it is pronounced POLISH and we will agree to disagree and when we meet outside the pearly gates, perhaps we can settle it there...

t


135 posted on 08/01/2019 8:43:22 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: central_va

8
———— = 1
2(2 + 2)

This^^^^^. Simply put, read it like a sentence. 8 divided by 2 times 2+2.

By rewriting it as a fraction, the answer becomes more clear.

For clarity the equation should be like this 8 / (2(2+2))


136 posted on 08/01/2019 8:44:44 AM PDT by walkingdead (By the time you realize this is not worth reading, it will be too late....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

Would you agree that the equation is poorly written and ambiguous?


137 posted on 08/01/2019 8:45:18 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead

See post 61...


138 posted on 08/01/2019 8:46:15 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

yes... but post 52 is better written and the same equation and the answer is 1

hehehe

be good my friend


139 posted on 08/01/2019 8:53:24 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

140 posted on 08/01/2019 8:59:50 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson