Replies

When I talk to people who are uninformed, at first I just try to hint at the truth. Hitting someone over the head with the vileness of these crimes is most often going to make them shut down, label me as a kook, refuse to listen, etc.

But for those who I think can handle some measure of the truth, I tend to use words along this spectrum:

crimes
evil
disgusting crimes
crimes against humanity
crimes against children
crimes against young children
pedophile

I try to stop before I reach a point where it could inflict harm on the listener.

I also may throw in “murder” which is a word that most people are “comfortable” with but is still able to convey some of the “extremeness” of their crimes.

I have never gone much beyond that. In fact I usually stop before “pedophile”. I think that many of those expressions can be interpreted in a multitude of ways and they carry sufficient information to get the idea across. The listener doesn’t need to know explicit details. In fact, I would be creeped out by anyone who wanted to know explicit details.

Is it not enough to know that someone is a pedophile to convict them?

And murder is murder. All serial killers are still looked on with disgust, even if it turns out their victims were prostitutes, gays, drug addicts or others who society doesn’t care as much about. So for those guilty of murder of kids so much the worse.

Some people I don’t talk to at all. I don’t think they could handle it. And I think we should respect that. IMO forcing someone to hear (or read) about all the sordid details of the derps is cruel. But for those who I think can handle some measure of the truth, I tend to use words along this spectrum:

I agree with you. I don't think anything is accomplished by forcing the issue on someone who isn't prepared to hear it. But I drop my own bread crumbs so that when the awful truth comes out the people with whom I've had discussions will not be in the dark.

Pedo crimes are horrific enough, but I think we all know that the crimes against children are FAR darker than that.

Q keeps asking 'what are temples used for?', or ' what happens in a temple'?and the answer seems to be 'worship'. But temples aren't places of worship. They are places of sacrifice. Sacrifice may be a part of worship, but the main activity is sacrifice. Sacrifices to the entity worshipped are done there. In ancient Israel it was rams and bulls...on Epstein's island I believe it's children. Hell is not hot enough for these rotten bastards.