Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

What Did Alex Acosta Mean When He Allegedly Said That Epstein “Belonged To Intelligence”?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3762996/posts

Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta.

BREAKING

Alexander Acosta To Speak Amid Jeffrey Epstein Accusations 2:30pm Eastern

https://youtu.be/uH9la2zv1kI


2,079 posted on 07/10/2019 9:48:37 AM PDT by BiggBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2072 | View Replies ]


To: BiggBob
What Did Alex Acosta Mean When He Allegedly Said That Epstein “Belonged To Intelligence”?

I caught that too, which would mean he's probably a black op intelligence asset or an asset of the central banking system cabal. Which would explain the discussion where he was an asset to blackmail celebrities, politicians, the rich and powerful, etc., here in the U.S. so the cabal can go about their corrupt business.

CGato

2,086 posted on 07/10/2019 10:07:48 AM PDT by Conservative Gato (Now there are 4 kind of lies... Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics and the Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2079 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson