Posted on 05/23/2019 6:28:39 AM PDT by Red Badger
Article is about the ~1860’s not the southern border or any other border today. Yes there’s still slave trading going on and probably always will be.
Good points!
Thank you for reminding me
https://sites.google.com/site/islamicscripturesunveiled/Home/slavery
“Islam does not prohibit slavery but retains it for two reasons. The first reason is war (whether it is a civil war or a foreign war in which the captive is either killed or enslaved) provided that the war is not between Muslims against each other - it is not acceptable to enslave the violators, or the offenders, if they are Muslims. Only non-Muslim captives may be enslaved or killed. The second reason is the sexual propagation of slaves which would generate more slaves for their owner.”
Dr. ‘Abdul-Latif Mushtahari
(Director of Homiletics and Guidance
Al-Azhar University, Cairo)
It is not so much of a puzzle if one considers the Bell Curve and the nature of the average intelligence of each of the races. I don't understand how the Chinese were so manipulated from past the Civil War until the turn of the century as their intelligence would have stopped the Californians from abusing, killing and using them as they did. The history of the Californians abusing the Chinese exceeded that of the blacks in the South IMO.
I wonder what the descendants of the smuggled contraband would think if the were returned to their homelands?
Wouldn’t that make them illegals?.............
The pirate museum is along the coastline in Southern Mass and is wonderful. The owner and his wife run the place.
In their homelands?
So you think that their homelands don’t want them?
No, here.....................
“Almost ALL the major ships were owned by a shrewd type of person always alleging they never had anything to do with slavery. And who wants you to constantly commemorate stuff you didn’t do, and which you in fact stopped.”
Where does the word “Jew” appear in the above quote?
Surely you understand that the word is used by implication. The poster is too shrewd (and cowardly) to use the word directly. Based on his many, many similar posts, his implication is perfectly clear.
Almost ALL the major ships were owned by a shrewd type of person always alleging they never had anything to do with slavery. And who wants you to constantly commemorate stuff you didn’t do, and which you in fact stopped.
DiogenesLamp said:
Vast majority of the ships were owned by New York/New Englanders.
Pretty much the same thing isn't it?
Almost ALL the major ships were owned by a shrewd type of person always alleging they never had anything to do with slavery. And who wants you to constantly commemorate stuff you didn’t do, and which you in fact stopped.
DiogenesLamp said:
Vast majority of the ships were owned by New York/New Englanders.
Pretty much the same thing isn't it?
How did those states thwart the abolition of slavery in VA and NC?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.