|
Posted on 03/13/2019 1:27:51 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
This investigation will eventually tie into Obama at Harvard. Enjoy.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3734615/posts?page=1
Report: Mueller May Be Wrapping Up, As “Pitbull” Weissmann To Step Down
saraacarter.com ^ | 3/14/2019 | Sara A. Carter
~~~~~~~~~~~
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3734614/posts
Former Obama Officials Ordered By Judge To Answer Judicial Watch Questions
saraacarter.com ^ | 3/14/2019 | Sara A. Carter
New drop 3055
https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1106212857727930368
The End Is Near.
Q
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
as predicted in earlier Q drops.....more “carpet bombs” keep coming at you:
ohr
page
strozk
steele (took 5th, but judge allows deposition from british lawsuit made public)
who’s up next??
I saw that... Poor AW, who can be smash now? Maybe he can become a NY prosecutor and pursue the Trump children. Someday he might attempt to indict God. 😜
https://twitter.com/search?src=typd&q=%40JackPosobiec
Jack Posobiec posts video affirming his early scoops on Barr shutting down Mueller and Weissman. Will reveal his confidential sources at a later date.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
the rest of the story????
I really have no use for Posocbiec. He is self serving.
Just got an update from Special Counsel Spokesman Peter Carr, Andrew Weissman is leaving the Special Counsel...Read Here: Mueller May Be Wrapping Up, As “Pitbull” Weissmann To Step Down https://t.co/cv6lsoVFQy via @SaraCarterDC— Sara A. Carter (@SaraCarterDC) March 14, 2019
Today, https://t.co/40xuX9Yq3h will be available for Americans to review the transcript of Peter Strzok during his interview with the Judiciary Committee. pic.twitter.com/lOMaJvY0uo— Rep. Doug Collins (@RepDougCollins) March 14, 2019
If they are talking about airport letter codes, there is a link to those.
[Mr. Meadows.] So let me go back, because one thing gets really concerning. So you give a brief on August the 25th. Director Brennan is giving a brief. It's not a Gang of Eight brief. It is a one-on-one, from what we can tell, a one-on-one briefing with Harry Reid at that point.
Bongino claims it was a gang of 8 briefing which included NP which is why she backed off impeachment.
Somebody is wrong..
I thought the Meadows questioning of LP about the "defensive briefing" was very interesting. Starts on page 86. He really has her tap dancing.
[Ms. Page] We want to do this in secret. We want to do this the way we do it. I don't know what Harry Reid was told or why or what the purpose of Brennan -- you know, this is way out of my pay grade. But like that's not how we want to proceed. We do things effectively when they're in secret. And so I think that that, you know, it's unavoidable, I guess, is, you know, well, these things happen, but not on our watch.
What????
LP also claims there are reasons they might not have given the "defensive briefing".
#1 There's no there there...
[Ms. Page.] No, not exactly, sir. You would want to know for sure what you had in front of you. [Mr. Meadows.] So you wouldn't want to falsely accuse somebody? [Ms. Page.] You wouldn't want to -- well, you would want to know -- you would want to be able to say: We believe that so-and-so is, you know, an agent of a foreign power or we believe that so-and-so may be working with, you know, a hostile foreign source. [Mr. Meadows.] And so that did not happen prior to November 8th of 2016 at least, because you would have done a defensive briefing, based on [Ms. Page.] Not -- there's no -- no, sir. There's no hard-and-fast rule. I don't -- I don't -- I don't want to leave the impression that once you meet X criteria a defensive briefing occurs. This is fluid and happens at the sort of discretion and judgment of senior counterintelligence officials and, frankly, the deputy or the Director himself with respect to certain high-level individuals. It's -- I'm -- I'm -- I'm a little constrained. I feel a little constrained in terms of what I can say. Let's try to speak hypothetically. One of two things might lead you not to conduct -- multiple things might lead you not to conduct a defensive briefing. One of them might be insufficient evidence. [Mr. Meadows.] Which is what you said at least at this date, you had insufficient -- [Ms. Page.] Certainly in August, I would agree with that. A couple weeks in, we don't know what we have. I think that that's fair. On the opposite spectrum, it might be inappropriate for investigative reasons to provide a defensive brief. [Mr. Meadows.] But that would only be if Donald Trump was the subject of your investigation. [Ms. Page.] No, sir.#2 Trump may have been the subject of the investigation..
[Q] And I just want to be clear of the nomenclature. When we talk about the Russia collusion investigation in this time frame, candidate Donald Trump is not the subject of that investigation. Is that correct? [A] That's correct.#3 Trump knew about the collusion...
[Ms. Page.] So the reason I am trying to tread lightly here is I don't think that Donald Trump would need to be the subject of the investigation in order for us to make a decision that a defensive briefing is not appropriate. But there are certainly gradations shy of subject which, if true -- and I'm not suggesting that they are true -- but if hypothetically, and I truly mean this in the hypothetical, if we thought that Donald Trump is not the subject, we're not suggesting that he's the person in touch with Russia, but maybe the evidence suggests that he knows that his people are in touch with Russia.
So I guess it's multiple choice... ???
Having trouble with my browser and can’t send via PM. :(
~~~~~~~~~~
New Q drops:
#3054
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3734405/posts?page=480#480
#3055
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3734405/posts?page=483#483
The operative word is “ought” ... college admission is based on a lot of factors including diversity, life-stories, national origin, athletic ability, and other factors the university feels they need to round out the student body. ... unless you want to parse the word ‘merit’ ...
https://dougcollins.house.gov/strzok
Link to the Strzok testimony :-)
...annnd .. I’m babysitting this afternoon. No time for popcorn :-(
Lipsey’s wife looks like Monica Witt!
I thought the exact same thing.
Would love love love to have dna testing done on all these corrupt creeps. Just how much of this is all in the family...?
Shocking——NOT
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) announced Thursday he will join other Republican senators opposing President Donald Trump’s national emergency declaration, contending that the vote does not amount to a vote “against border security.”
And you know there were a LOT of people who just ‘disappeared’ after katrina. We all assumed they were missing/presumed dead and killed by the storm. Knowing what we know now I have to wonder if they weren’t trafficked.
So we think she’s an IRANIAN spook? Could she have been running Strzok? Or vice versa? That would explain why there was no pet talk between the “lovers.” Unfortunately, given the way the spooks work together, they may have all been in cahoots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
