Posted on 02/15/2019 10:51:23 PM PST by ransomnote
Are you peeing in the elf’s ear and telling him it’s raining?
OMG!
Historically yes. As an answer to the 'shaky' service no, usually USAF. I believe that situation has been resolved.
Shoes and gloves.
Ew.
“Surely there’s a Senate committee that would be interested in interviewing Jussie.”
Ha! Maybe the SENATE would like to interview him, but definately not the House!!
“Chatter - Bill & Hillarys public health will begin to rapidly deteriorate. “
Any thoughts why this will be seen?
If WJC met LL on the plane about a SC seat, who made the call if SCJ Scalia was a target?
The Nerds select only the most Nerdy!
GOOD JOB EASY!!!!!!
I'm sure the NSA knows.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/democrats-went-crazy-in-three-months/
How the Democrats Went Nuts in Three Months (Will Pelosi lose the House - again?)
National Review via Yahoo ^ | 2/15/19 | Michael Brendan Dougherty
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3728196/posts?page=960#960
That pic was taken awhile back (2018?).
Grey_whiskers pointed out she was wearing red shoes...
Ping!!
New Q
NEW Q - 2576
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 87d0f5 No.5234560
Feb 17 2019 22:02:02 (EST)
Barr to Mueller:
Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.
Mueller to Bart:
With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc
Barr to Mueller:
Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia. What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?
Mueller to Barr:
Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.
Barr to Mueller:
Was the Steele report a trusted and verified report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?
Mueller to Barr:
Those facts were never taken into consideration. FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.
Barr to Mueller:
Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?
Mueller to Barr:
No. We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.
Barr to Mueller:
Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified? Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?
All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?
Barr to RR:
What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion? What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law? Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse? Why wasnt the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request? Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification? Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?
CLAS 1-99
Q
That's a pretty good thread, for being outside of our quarantine zone. The Monty Python dead parrot sketch is woven through it.
Finally got to the end of the thread..
Easy, you done reeel good. Now, make this one, and send it to DJTJr’s twitter:
~~~~~~~~~~~~
“DJT JR TWEETED: https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1097244533006323712
Kathy Griffin: No one can ruin a career faster than I can.
Jussie Smollet: Hold my bleach!!!
:: who made the call if SCJ Scalia was a target? ::
Who convinced Scalia to go hunting at the Texas ranch?
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 87d0f5 No.5234583
Feb 17 2019 22:03:09 (EST)
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 87d0f5 No.5234560
Feb 17 2019 22:02:02 (EST)Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.
nite
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.