Q Anon: 02/06/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 02/06/19 | FReepers, vanity

[Disestablishmentarian]

So, regarding AOC, I am hopeful she gets the Eminem treatment. By POTUS denying her the spotlight that his mentions bring, she will be apoplectic and further gobble her way down in the trough of pig slop and no conseQuence.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This might be best for now, but eventually I think he's going to have to take her out, or at least down several pegs.

Most likely, a lot of Eminem's fans are on the Trump Train. I've always suspected Mr. Mathers got a wakeup call from his own fans.

On second thought, maybe there is a way for POTUS to go after at least the uneducated millennials in AOC's camp. I do think his tutorial on socialism may have opened some eyes!

[SERKIT]

I would prefer Whitaker’s jersey showing #45!

[bagster]

I missed the definition of 5:5
Could you please clue me in?

Ichabod1 reminds us what 5:5 means.

I found something in Clancy’s Red Rabbits last night. We have been talking about the definition of 5:5 and I had been thinking it meant “Loud and Clear” but then I read this: “Damn”, Ryan observed. “This is reliable?” “Very much so, It’s a five-five, Jack” By that he meant tht the source was rated five on a scale of five for reliability, and the importance of the information reported was graded the same way.”

So it means reliable source, important information.

😃

Bagster

[defconw]

Any DC Freeqers willing to go on a mission? The building is open to the public. Anyone know any lawyers in DC?

[Andy from Chapel Hill]

Thanks!

[BiggBob]

So the talking heads said that they would have to have a deal by this past Friday to avoid another shutdown.

FreeQ poll:

In El Paso today do you think Trump will announce:

The military will build the wall?

They have a tentative deal in congress to build the wall?

The nominee to replace RBG?

Something else?

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

5:5
Intel on subject is iron-clad reliable (5)
Priority of intel movement is “highest” (5)

[TruthWillWin]

1 & 3?

[Hostage]

His history along with Rosenstein, Comey, McCabe, and many, many others and especially Andrew Weissman, all are as dirty as dirty can be. They are Clintonites to the letter.

Rosenstein feigns as a Republican but his wife Barsoomian is joined at the hip with the Clinton mob.

McCabe likewise claims to be a Republican but look at his wife and how they both fed at the Clinton corruption trough.

Weissman belongs behind bars, for life. No exaggeration in this. See the Levin interview with Powell, what Weissman did to the Authur Anderson Execs is a textbook case of corruption.

It’s awful to think what these people did, how many lives they have destroyed, harmed.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

The other end of that scale is the oft-used “0:0” by SC-Mueller.
It means, “we got nothing”. “make sh!t up for the press”.

[KitJ]

[pgkdan]

the ongoing protests in France with many dead and thousands arrested.

And not just France. Yellow vest protests have popped up all over Europe and the UK. Also in Canada, Australia, Taiwan, and other places. It's freaking amazing...and there are Q references at all of them. Folks with Q or WWG1WGA on their vests or positive comments about POTUS. But you never see a word in our media. This is a world wide populist revolt and to the average American watching CNN or ABCCBCNBC News...it's not happening.

BTW...if you want to keep up with the WW Populist revolution follow Dr. Steve Turley on YT. He's outstanding. Here's one of his videos

[haffast]

NEW Q

I see 2689 & 2690 https://qanon.pub/?

Unable to post

[KitJ]

[ichabod1]

I just read an article from a surgeon saying that tranny men have a right to have artificial womb’s implanted, or more precisely, organ donation wombs.

[TXBubba]

Two new Qs out there.

[TXBubba]

Love: You are the news now.

[ichabod1]

It means that the information is from a source that is rated five on a scale of five for reliability, and five out of five for importance of the information.

[ichabod1]

A tweet from the comments:

aQQQinwavz
@phoebegirl55
·
12h
Replying to
@paul_serran and @TheSpeaker2018
Pound their strong holds with cornbead rpgs and then rain some peanut butter cookie bombs on top of their heads!!!! Throw in some 50cal toilet paper rolls and finish off with tuna fish grenades and suicide squads wearing Hershy bar vests for their just deserts !!!!

[ransomnote]

2689

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI11 Feb 2019 - 9:50:22 AM

VoterFraud.jpg

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign📁
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428📁
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html📁
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html📁
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q