~~~~
4. Lots of speculation Amy Coney Barrett could be next SCOTUS nom. Dems used "wrap-up smear" tactic on Justice Kavanaugh. https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4754024/nancy-pelosi-wrap-up-smear … Will Dems try to use her Catholic faith/pro-life stance to try to stop her? https://www.scotusblog.com/2018/07/potential-nominee-profile-amy-coney-barrett … SENATE WAS THE TARGET 53-47
“Will Dems try to use her Catholic faith/pro-life stance to try to stop her?”
If they use this full blown like they did the sex accusation with Kavanaugh I predict it will back fire BIG time. The crazy godless left will love it but everyone else will be either very angry or very uncomfortable attacking someone who is committed to their beliefs. I don’t doubt they would but it will further expose who they are and the vision they hold for America.
Also that would make the 53-47 number more relevant. What Republican in their right mind would oppose a woman for her deeply held values. They would be sealing their fate. Even gentlemanly attention w&ore Mitt couldn’t oppose her.
I hope the Dems do use Barrett’s religion against her. That way the idiots can alienate any Catholics who still vote with the Dems and we can ask why the same argument is not being used against Catholics in Congress. Many Hispanics are strong Catholics they would react poorly to the Dems trashing their faith.
I have been thinking if I were a colleague of the Hawaiian hen, and Kamala Cabala and the Fiend Stein that I would want to bring this trio of Anti-Constitutionalist hags up on ethics charges.
There remarks should stand alone and hang them, or else, there is no reason to have an Ethics Committee. There would be no ethics standards, but for coronating the total absence of ethics.