REPORT: Huber and Horowitz Investigations Deep State Cons Constructed by DOJ…
Paul Sperry has an interesting report posted at RCP-Investigations outlining numerous interviews with DC politicians and would-be witnesses, if any actual DOJ investigation of the FBI and DOJ misconduct was taking place. What Sperry discovers is the year-long narrative around John Huber and Michael Horowitz is factually false. [SEE HERE]
Just like the false framework surrounding the long-forgotten U.S. Attorney John Lausch; the guy who was supposedly hired to facilitate DOJ record production but actually did nothing of the sort; Sperry discovers the framework around U.S. Attorney John Huber was manufactured by career officials inside the DOJ to tamp down problematic demands for a second special counsel.
Worse still, and absolutely confirming information from our own contacts within the OIG, Paul Sperry outlines how Michael Horowitz has not interviewed key people who would be part of any authentic FISA abuse inquiry. [READ HERE]
Unfortunately, this information is directly in-line with information received by CTH in September of 2018. According to people with knowledge of DOJ-OIG operations, and restrictions upon the IG imposed by chain-of-command authority, Horowitz’s investigation has been limited by Mueller’s team.
According to our own independent sourcing, as a direct consequence of the Sessions recusal issues, DAG Rosenstein was in charge of approving all OIG investigative document production and DOJ/FBI scheduling for testimony. Mueller’s team gave Rosenstein a list of restrictive lines of inquiry that would be considered obstructing their own investigation and should thereby be considered ‘out-of-bounds‘ for OIG review; those instructions broadly created limits on what Horowitz could see, and who Horowitz could interview.
According to a person directly involved, an internal investigative complaint was filed to the AG; however, due to recusal issues that complaint was forwarded (by Sessions) to FBI chief-legal-counsel Dana Boente.
General Counsel Boente, hired by Christopher Wray, ultimately concurred with Mueller and Rosenstein’s decision thereby blocking any internal investigative efforts under the auspices of protecting the integrity of the ongoing Mueller probe.
A bureaucratic catch-22.
[continues]
_______________________________
I hardly know what to believe anymore from the various outlets. My thought was the recent mention of a stealth player (people guessed Sessions but he's AG so how would he really be stealth)? And then there's this Q drop:
2601(Excerpted)
>>4278743
What if there's another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?
ONE FOR THE HISTORY BOOKS?
NOT LONG NOW.
Q
The subject of the investigators never interviewing key witnesses keeps coming up. If they “have it all”, why would interviews be necessary? Seems to me that the less contact with those waiting to be indicted, the better.
> Horowitz’s investigation has been limited by Mueller’s team.
Impossible. No authority what so ever to do that.
Change my mind.
-SB
Dreadful if true...
Maybe Huber and Horowitz, for the most part, are a ruse on the Deep State while they prepare GITMO and prepare for the Military Tribunals.
My FR background, briefly: been here in various names since 1998. I rarely comment. Followed Q somewhat closely for more than a year - until the mid-terms, after which I began to suspect authenticity. Now only check this thread on occasion. Today’s encounter brought me to your post.
My comment: if it is true what CTH writes concerning Huber and Horowitz, then Q is a LARP. In terms of complexity and deviousness, this would make Q = Quidam (*1000).
Adieu.
I am 100% sure Sundance is 100% wrong. He thinks Q is stoopit and thus has big blockages.
I trust Q, Huber and Horowitz, and Sessions, and Trump, a helluva lot more than Sundance.