Posted on 12/18/2018 10:23:39 PM PST by ransomnote
Social media and Gulag are EEEEVIL. More proof.
FB violation of YOUR PRIVACY.
FB actively TRACKING YOU.
FB reading your PRIVATE messages.
FB CENSORING (anti conservative).
More will drop.
We have it ALL.
CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS are EFFECTIVE.
GLOBAL.
@Jack
You’re next.
Of course.
TRUMP WALL CENSORED: GoFundMe Page for Trump Border Wall Removed From Trending Campaigns
Brian Kolfage, the triple amputee Air Force veteran who is behind the #GoFundTheWall effort on GoFundMe, told The Gateway Pundit that he believes the crowdfunding site has begun censoring the fund to build the wall along our southern border.
In an update to supporters of the campaign, which is barrelling towards $700k in the first 48 hours, he alleges that it is becoming increasingly harder to find the #GoFundTheWall page through the search tool on GoFundMe. Kolfage is urging people to share the direct link on social media and with prospective donors in order to avoid confusion.
“GoFundMe removed our Trump Wall campaign from their top list. We are the top fundraiser right now and they removed it from the list. We were front and center on their homepage. Do they not want us to succeed?
GoFundMe has removed the #GoFundTheWall campaign from the trending page for no reason & are making it difficult for users to find using the search tool, as per organizer / veteran @BrianKolfage. Read about the effort, which has raised close to $700k –> https://t.co/XhImQuDB7A
— Jacob Engels (@JacobEngels) December 19, 2018
Donate directly to the campaign by clicking here or sharing this link… https://www.gofundme.com/TheTrumpWall
This seems the peculiar “fly in the ointment” because, once a national security emergency is declared…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And it has been
I was worried about Nazgul in black robes.
Now I am not. Thanks for info.
Can we put this to rest now?
Patriots are deliberately exposing the Democrats and their unwillingness to protect us.
Anons act like you’ve been here before. Please.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/economic-intelligence/articles/2017-07-19/congress-slyly-diverts-pentagon-money-to-fund-donald-trumps-border-wall
It’s good to pay attention in class, yes?
#WasHopingSomeoneWouldGetIt
#PostedAmongTheQuioveringMasses
#HardToAvoidQ-ing
Its a shame I didn’t pay half this much attention in class when I was 40 years younger!
Talk about governing under the cover of darkness.
No doubt from a supporter of 0bamacare.
Responded to Texokie and slid onto the next thread without realizing it!
As always, thanks you you and all the others who put this together.
“””Chris Chriostie was.
#InToIt
#Really BIG SprinsteenFanKEK”””
Yeah? The guy who plays a conservative on TV, and then grovels over Liberals like Bamacane and Springtoid?
He just politely informed us he did not want 45 to consider him for CoS. As if.
MSM sang a HIGH SEE at the news.
He blows.
Heard tell he has an exploratory committee arranged to seek support for election to the position of...
Corsi
The same thing that makes a great Proof!
X = 9 + 8; Solve for X!
That image would make a great t-shirt!
I was insulted, and we spell it “Inuit”
“””Heard tell he has an exploratory committee arranged to seek support for election to the position of...
Corsi”””
As a counterweight?
I wonder, if you placed them on opposite sides of the earth, would it lessen the wobble?
Very good one!
CNN Legal Setback Points to Tougher Times Ahead for Media Companies
In a defamation case, the Eleventh Circuit rejects how CNN and other media companies demanded the special-dismissal provision of Georgia’s anti-SLAPP statute.
NN may still be enjoying its courtroom victory last month saving White House correspondent Jim Acosta’s press pass, but as far as the First Amendment goes, the television news network better be ready to play some defense. That’s because on Friday, CNN suffered a bruising loss in an important appeal that will at the very least make it easier to sue the media in federal court in a handful of states including Georgia, where CNN is headquartered.
The appeal arises from a series of reports in June 2015 on the infant mortality rate for open-heart surgery at West Palm Beach, Florida-based St. Mary’s Medical Center. That series, showcased on Anderson Cooper’s show, asserted that St. Mary’s “death rate” was three times the national average — prompting defamation lawsuits, including from David Carbone, formerly the chief executive at the hospital until he was forced to resign upon CNN’s report. Carbone alleges that CNN made an unfair comparison to hospitals that did both open-heart and closed-heart surgeries, and that a more proper comparison would be adjusted for risk.
CNN contends that Carbone can’t meet the “of and concerning” standard of a defamation suit because the report didn’t mention him by name, and further argues that an academic disagreement about methodology can’t support a defamation claim and that its chosen methodology comparing mortality rates constitutes non-actionable opinion.
However, the specific arguments for the deficiency of Carbone’s claims have taken a back seat to the standard by which a Georgia federal judge had to decide whether the case should move past an initial dismissal motion.
Like many states, Georgia has aimed to deter frivolous litigation implicating First Amendment activity by passing an anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. Under this law, a plaintiff like Carbone is limited in pursuing discovery and a defendant like CNN saves the costly burden of defending — and possibly settling — litigation unless the legal claims show a “probability” of prevailing.
By federal rules, though, plaintiffs merely need to demonstrate the “plausibility” of a complaint on its face in order to advance in lawsuits.
The contrast between probability and plausibility (and rules governing cases in state and federal court) thus amounts to a significantly different evidentiary burden for plaintiffs at the get-go. What happens when because of the diversity of citizenship for the parties, lawsuits raising state-based claims are tried in federal court? Other media companies, fearful of having a tougher time getting out of nuisance lawsuits, supported CNN in amicus briefs arguing that Georgia’s anti-SLAPP law should apply. But the benefits of SLAPP deterrence aren’t just for media companies. For example, President Donald Trump recently used Texas’ anti-SLAPP law to defeat the defamation lawsuit brought by Stormy Daniels, and while Trump has often advocated for looser libel laws, he certainly enjoyed and boasted about the nearly $300,000 in legal fees that Daniels was ordered to pay in the case. Fee-shifting is another common component of state anti-SLAPP laws.
On Friday, Eleventh Circuit Judge William Pryor provided an answer to the question of procedure in the Carbone case.
Rest here:https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/cnn-legal-setback-points-tougher-times-media-companies-1169938
$755,502 of $1.0B goal
Raised by 12,279 people in 2 days
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.