Posted on 12/14/2018 10:00:25 PM PST by ransomnote
stylin19a wrote:
perhaps you may honor your friend this way.
not eligible for inclusion on “the wall” but is eligible for inclusion to VVMF’s In Memory program
http://www.vvmf.org/adding-a-name
Semper Fi.
My friend who lost his life in combat does have his name on the veterans memorial wall. I went and found it and have taken pictures.
My other friend who lost his health battles with agent orange should be honored in some way. The gov’t admitted fault and is providing full benefits for his wife. I will have to ask her if she knows about the VVMF In Memory program.
Have you ever thought what a fascinating cult we are, that we encourage our members to think for themselves? Not everyone feels that way, of course. Some become so wrapped up in a particular belief that it’s hard to imagine another person not seeing the obvious logic. But, for most, coming to our own conclusions is something we esteem and respect. Perhaps the “cult of the diverse” as our title?
https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2018/12/mueller-blew-flynn-case.html
Mueller blew the Flynn case
Fox News reported, “Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team on Friday released key documents relating to the FBI’s questioning of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, confirming agents did not believe at the time Flynn intentionally lied to them — though he was later charged with making false statements in that interview.”
I told you that Bungling Bob Mueller had a bad day on Wednesday when federal Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered him to release all exculpatory evidence that could clear General Flynn.
And so it came to pass.
Fox News reported, “The documents also reveal that the decision to interview Flynn in early 2017 about contacts with the Russian ambassador was controversial within the Justice Department. One FBI document said then-Acting Attorney General Sally Yates “was not happy” when then-FBI Director James Comey informed her that the FBI planned to talk to Flynn. The report also said several unnamed people back at FBI headquarters ‘later argued about the FBI’s decision to interview Flynn.’”
Sullivan was the judge who threw out the conviction of Senator Ted Stevens because federal prosecutors withheld evidence that cleared Stevens.
Now Mueller has done the same thing.
In fact, lover boy Peter Strzok may have cleared Flynn. He apparently never filed a form 302 report on the interview of Flynn where Mueller contended Flynn lied.
Fox News reported, “The documents include then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s notes after talking with Flynn to arrange his interview with the FBI. It also includes a so-called “302” report documenting what Flynn told anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok and one other agent during their conversation at the White House. That July 2017 report, though, specifically came from an interview with Strzok in which the Flynn encounter was discussed — and not the original Flynn interview. It was unclear why no 302 report from the interview itself was included.
“The 302 report stated that Strzok and the other agent ‘both had the impression at the time that Flynn was not lying or did not think he was lying.’
“The report described Flynn as ‘unguarded,’ saying he ‘clearly saw the FBI agents as allies.’ It also stated Flynn discussed a number of ‘various subjects,’ including things like hotels stayed in during the campaign, Trump’s ‘knack for interior design’ and other issues unrelated to their inquiry.
“’Flynn was so talkative, and had so much time for them, that Strzok wondered if the national security adviser did not have more important things to do than have a such a relaxed, non-pertinent discussion with them,’ it said.”
Hmm. This puts the conversation in a whole different light. There was no investigation of President Trump at the time. General Flynn thought he was shooting the breeze with FBI agents, whom he saw as fellow good guys.
The only thing he is guilty of is gullibility.
It’s a good thing Mueller has big feet because they can take so many bullets without crippling him.
Mueller thought he could bully Flynn into lying about the president. Wrong!
...thanks to Q, we can continue to be of service...
............
That is FReeQin’ beautiful. Eyes wet with thankfulness for the devotion of our veterans.
But… there is the matter of The Envelope. Why did she get one?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
O.
M.
G.
Absolutely false. My very first comment on a Q thread was an honest question and I was on the fence as to my belief in “Q” - but hoping it was true. I was immediately flamed in a message and called a troll.
Really, can you post a link, cause your last post to this Q thread was on Nov. 17. You asked a question about Nov. 11 and received a lovely reply from Disestablishmentarian. the only other reply was one of the “q is an outsiders” guys giving us snark.
...It seems unlikely that one could keep up with it all.
The first thing that really helps is to know the players. Our very own FReeQ has made a wonderful LexiQon of terms and personages for that purpose.
Then to stay abreast of the latest Q developments one needs to read Bagster’s Oracle. The oracle delves into the latest Q Drops as well as the other hot topics and research that interest we FReeQs at the time of the new drops. This ongoing work is great for both keeping up and also for doing some reviewing when one feels a bit overwhelmed and needing references from old drops. Some new incoming drops are based off those old ones.
The great thing about the things I just mentioned is that our fearless leader, Ransomnote, provides the links to these thread supports as well as many others at the beginning of each new thread posted.
I hope this is helpful, WWG1WGA.
THE MEDIA IS THE LAST LINE OF THEIR DEFENSE
oh geez...
I do not accept the Cohen story that Trump forced him to pay off the blackmailing women.
As a Professional, you must follow the Law. If a client requests you break the Law, you can always ask the ethics office of your Professional Association for an opinion.
Trump is not the only Client in New York.
Cohen had every opportunity to tell Trump to find another Lawyer. Cohen had every opportunity to walk away.
great advice from the Troll Master.
and thanks for always having our backs.
Yep. Bagsters “always attack” rule is right out of Alinsky’s rules for radicals. That can’t be denied. It’s right out of the lefty playbook
Yes she has become the very thing she hates
“I request that those wishing to discuss matters with FReepers who have a history of disrupting Q threads do so via private message rather than pinging said FReepers to our thread. I believe attention to this small detail will help us concentrate on our work (and our play). ThankQ.”
______________
One admonition to this:
Some disrupters will relish the chance to get you to be harsh in your PMs - so that they can report you for harassing. Do not fall for this trap. You will be sitting in the corner for a day or a week.
The only thing he is guilty of is gullibility.
Does this guy look gullable?
Could be the opposite....the FBI were gullable
They screwed up the paperwork,
Flyn gets discovery
FBI busted.
Thank gawdd you are here to call her attention to it!
#GoodLittleNPC
#OrangeManBad
As with any cult, they can be “great” to you so long as you are a True Believer and do not stray too widely in your questions.
But if you express any doubts or make any challenging or critical remark, you may expect the wrath of the Cult Enforcers.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This happens on every thread in every message board and comment thread across the internet. Grow up. Don’t believe me, run over to Facebook and post “Trump is the greatest President in the history of the USA” and sit back and watch.
Why do you care what Bagster does on a thread you don’t even want to be on? Stop trying to take something from everybody who doesn’t bow down to your superior intellect. It just makes you a shallow, myopic villian.
bfl
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.