a.) Its "whiffed".
b.) I'm not afraid to "whiff". I do it all the time. So does everybody else.
...think they are referring to the Strasbourg terror attack as a false flag.
Maybe. Maybe not. Some people have posted that. Thing is, just saying "false flag" isn't enough. Q says the purpose of the "event" is to "quell growing protests against (Macron/Frog Derp Government/EU)".
So this event, according to Q, was intended to "quell" the protests. Was it to divert attention? Was it to intimidate the protestors into going home? Was it to make the protests seem to be a part of or in some way causul (is that even a word?) to the terrorist act in some way?
I just don't like saying "false flag" without the attached meaning/purpose.
One of the biggest problems I have with Qs credibility...just come out and tell us Mr. Insider....quit beating around the bush.
Read Q's recent posts regarding WHY he "beats around the bush" and the myriad past posts explaining EXACTLY THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
After you do that, maybe you won't have such a problem?
Here's a partial from Q post #2567 (yesterday) to get the ball rolling. After that, you're on your own, goodman.
How do you 'safely' & 'securely' communicate through a backchannel w/ the public and bypass the FAKE NEWS MEDIA?
How do you 'safely' & 'securely' communicate w/o breaking the law and violating NAT SEC?
Thank you for posting, patriot.
BTW, have you not see the email or you'd rather not bother with it? It's a bit of a deeply personal plea.
Of course, your 100th ORACLE is an impressive milestone of quality work.
How do you 'safely' & 'securely' communicate through a backchannel w/ the public and bypass the FAKE NEWS MEDIA? How do you 'safely' & 'securely' communicate w/o breaking the law and violating NAT SEC? Q
Regarding "cryptic, obtuse, vague & non-specific"...unfortunately that works at least 2 ways...one way is what you mentioned "not blow my Q cover"...the other way is "unknown people playing a game and enjoying the attention" (or deep state/intelligence agencies playing a "distract them/placate them until Trump is gone" game). I have only seen maybe 14 or 15 "Q" posts, but I have seen nothing so far that would indicate he/she/them are/is a "true insider"...could just as easily be a dude from "R/The_Donald" on Reddit.
Most FReepers have enough knowledge/information & writing skills to be "Q". For example a Q post recently (#2543) said "anybody could be doing this" to me...President Trump makes a spelling error, so "Q" Googles' (Duck, Duck Go!) "Scott Free" and came up with a lame reference to a production company/movie...help me out here, does "Where we go one, we go all" appear in any Q posts prior to #2543? Or is "WWG1WGA" get it's start with #2543??
Anyway, I am not a "Q denier" quite yet...but I haven't seen anything yet that couldn't be written by just about anybody with an imagination & Internet access. If/when I get a lot of free time I guess I will have to review a lot more of the 2600 Q posts. (https://qmap.pub is the best "review them" resource right?)
Keep searching for truth fellow patriot!