Posted on 12/10/2018 10:18:07 PM PST by ransomnote
T and Q placed together. Two separate persons. Trump and Q. Trump is not Q.
There’s something odd ‘bout Melania’s eyes and Santa’s eyes - Naaaah, can’t be...
No, he is Q+
Re: the disarming of the french people (and other nations).
Disarming is another facet of our discussion from last night about false flag terrorist attacks. The People must be disarmed by The State to have maximum control over them and inflict maximum fear on the people, who being disarmed, have no way to protect themselves during False Flag Attacks. Throwing Bagettes and wheels of fine cheese at an attacker is not effective.
The state then succeeds in complete terrorization of the helpless citizens. See the term shelter in place for The States suggestion on what to do when under assault. I dunno, I prefer Shoot To Kill The Terrorist and saving innocent lives. Yet the globalists insist we the people cower in fear waiting to die. We are Americans, we who are still armed shoot back.
And another thing...isnt it odd that Paris ( and other locales in the world) have No Go Zones? Isnt it governments duty to Protect the citizens?
The globalists use terror on the people and they import terrorists and give up zones where they may live as they please, even using sharia law and trying/succeeding in imposing it on true citizens.
End of rant
Right! Trump = Q+.
Another moron trolling the thread.
We don’t need stupid people showing their ignorance, so you can move along now.
Logically, that would mean that everyone ever convicted at trial is actually guilty -- that no one innocent is ever found guilty.
A procedural issue re the jurors: in the state of Victoria where he was on trial, they don't have the feature that we have in the courts here (I don't know what it's called), where the prosecution and defense question jurors and approve or reject them based on what they think their prejudices are. You get the jurors who are called, and that's it.
The most serious charges were thrown out last May. For one of them, the accuser said the abuse took place in a chapel. He then changed it to a playground. He then changed it to a mountain. The judge tossed it, saying he had a bad memory.
Another charge was Pell abused a boy at a movie theater. But no one at the theater saw Pell there, and the movie the (now adult) boy said was playing wasn't. Tossed.
One thing that's really scary: if you are innocent, how do you defend yourself against 40-year-old charges?
So, I feel better, thanks to generally. And I'll continue to pray for Cardinal Pell. If Q comes out with proof in the future that he's guilty, then I will admit I'm wrong.
B= Barron? T= Trump? Q=Melania?
I also believe Melania is part of Q team.
DJT=4+10+20 =34/2=17!!
Interesting
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.