Skip to comments.Q Anon: 12/06/18 Trust Trump's Plan
Posted on 12/06/2018 10:46:50 PM PST by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Storm Is Upon Us Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube Dan Duval Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 - Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium Martin Geddes WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread Qanon.app Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Thread Qanonposts.com Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website Qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website Whitehouse Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website FBI vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website State Dept. foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table FReeQs Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
“Power to the People”
Website Saul Montes-Bradley Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex , Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
Vimeo Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops. Also, his own website, ITunes and Podbean.com
Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drop. Also, his own website YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Neonrevolt Includes highly detailed, investigative Q-drop reactionsAlso,@NeonRevolt on GAB.AI
GAB.AI Thomas_Wictor Includes excellent analysis of the Swamp
Lisa Mei Crowley Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
Do these organizations and agencies ever start off on the RIGHT foot?
It seems as if the people who fight to start or run such organizations are nearly always those with nefarious reasons. Normal people mostly do not want such jobs. People who see how to use it to enrich themselves claw and scratch their way to the top.
Also, most people are not arrogant enough to think they are qualified to run such organizations. It seems that those who think the are qualified rarely are. I look at people like sHitlery and Bill and 0vomit and Kerry, etc, etc., and I think holy crap I’m 10 times smarter than they are, yet they are the ones who think they should be in charge and I think I don’t know enough. (And most of us here are infinitely smarter than Mad Max and Occasional Cortex, yet they are in Congress!!!!!)
Take it outside, please...we have enough conspiracy theories to discuss here without adding more....
Conspiracy theory In a theatrical trailer for his film F For Fake, Welles joked about such theories, jesting that the broadcast indeed "had secret sponsors".
While Mercury Theatre had no sponsor, CBS and the Rockefeller Foundation were contracting the leading crowd psychology researchers of the time; CBS had Edward Bernays, the Rockefeller Foundation had Ivy Lee.
With the involvement of Frank Stanton in the Radio Project and his position in the CBS research department, it is possible the "creative curiosity" of Orson Welles came from conversations within these business circles. A detailed documentary on these circles and the ideas behind social manipulation was made by the BBC, called The Century of the Self.
There has been continued speculation the panic generated by War of the Worlds inspired officials to cover up unidentified flying object evidence, avoiding a similar panic. U.S. Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, the first head of UFO investigatory Project Blue Book wrote, "The [U.S. government's] UFO files are full of references to the near mass panic of October 30, 1938, when Orson Welles presented his now famous The War of the Worlds broadcast."
That's all the digging I'm energetic enough to bother with today. Sorry.
IIRC, What I read years ago was a declassified CIA document to the effect that they set up the media folks, including Orson Welles, to pull it off.
It's arguable as to what % of the population were how terrified. The mythos about it is evidently as interesting as the facts.
Nevertheless, the government DID use that whole thing as justification for maintaining strict UFO secrecy.
Evidently the panic was on the part of small percentages. And it was a small percentage of the population that heard the show to begin with.
I Greatly agree with your excellent points. Thanks.
>> It’s arguable as to what % of the population were how terrified. The mythos about it is evidently as interesting as the facts.
I think you’ve made an important point here. How much of the “terror” was really a myth?
The show has been broadcast a couple of times since, once in some foreign country where someone was actually killed. But the person who was killed was killed because the people found out it was fake and were angry at having been deceived.
And then I’ve noticed that there have been a few recent discussions of the whole thing. A Freakonomics podcast, for one. Have these recent discussions been done to reinforce the possibly false idea that the public can’t handle the truth? How accurate are they? (Freakonomics has also had a series this summer/fall of CEO interviews and most or all of those CEOs have since resigned. Coincidence???)
At my age, I don't care greatly who believes what about my convictions and assessments of and constructions on reality.
You can disbelieve if you wish. You can believe if you wish. You can be ambivalent if you wish. I don't give a great rip.
I did not sign on as your or anyone else's research assistant.
I have soaked up tons of information over many decades of life as a matter of being an info hog. I didn't keep refs for most of it. I don't recall refs for a lot of it.
Nevertheless, I will continue to share my impressions and constructions on reality from my observations, inferences, conclusions whenever I care to in whatever venue affords an attractive opportunity.
You are welcome to scroll on by.
You are also welcome to demand whatever criteria of proof from someone else. I'm not playing your game.
You make very worthy points about how much the citizens can accept before going into shocked denial and closed ears & eyes.
Absolutely indeed. It still boggles my mind that so many are soooooooo skeptical when there is more than ample evidence of such hideousness. Liz Crokin is an excellent source and her assertions have never been successfully debunked.
“Somebody remind me, when the Obama campaign was caught having committed some VERY SERIOUS violations of federal campaign finance laws, how many indictments were issued?
The correct answer is....0
When the Obama campaign was found to have violated federal campaign finance laws, it was a CIVIL crime and a penalty was paid: $375,000.”
I am watching that now.
I think the public needs to know the full truth eventually.
If someone is actually eating babies, do you think she just up and started doing that overnight? No. Someone gradually conditioned her to think this was a good idea.
In the same way, the public needs to be prepared for the full truth. We can’t be slapped in the face with it suddenly.
If your friend’s husband dies of a heart attack, you don’t call her up and say “hey, your husband is dead”. You break it to her gently. And maybe if she is in the middle of some other serious event - like she’s in labor giving birth, you wait. But you HAVE TO TELL HER. You can’t keep hiding it.
If we don’t learn full the truth, we can’t prevent the same thing from happening again.
I may not choose to learn about the gory details just as I do not choose to watch slasher movies. But I want the info available to adults who choose to know. Hiding the truth is not the answer.
Though I don’t watch horror movies, I have a basic idea of what is in them. If I ever needed to watch them (maybe to understand what my kids had been exposed to or something), I would. I would not want someone “protecting” me from them if I had a need to know. I’d want a warning about the content and I’d want the freedom to choose.
So for the purposes of government secrecy surrounding DS crimes, I want the freedom to choose. I’d want to know the general idea and I’d want to be free to research the details. Perhaps there could be levels of information and warning with each level. Kind of like movie ratings.
There are some odd things about that PDF...
I just saw this post from Neon Revolt’s Gab thread posted about 7 hrs. ago from what looks like 8 chan. I tried to copy it using what little instructions I’ve read on our thread, but was not successful.
After fiddling around I finally got something that I think should link. If anyone knows how to post this whole thing, I’d appreciate it if they would please post it. Also PM me how you did it. Thanks.
Crossing fingers that it links.
*** Grits Redux Slide ***
...I think the public needs to know the full truth eventually...
Perhaps in 50 years. It’s just my opinion, based on liberal friends of mine.
They will accept nothing derogatory against Hillary or Obama, especially regards child trafficking or child sacrifice.
With enough evidence, I believe they would accept crimes or treason, although I’m sure they would find an excuse for it - they were misinformed, they were taken advantage of or it was a poor judgement call.
To avoid mass rioting in the streets, the crimes have to be something the general public can be convinced of. Otherwise, they will be convinced that President Trump is politically motivated and carrying on a witch hunt.
For this country to heal and come together, people have to finally be able to back the government.
Good luck with that happening in Trumps case. Something better be done.
Yep. The link works.
this guy claims there are CF workers fleeing the country
and the Hill reports that HRC is in India ‘attending a wedding’..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.