Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ETL

ETL, In your post #3 you show the ‘67 and ‘68 Mustangs. I had a ‘67 and loved that car. Much better than the ‘65’s. The only outward difference between the ‘67 and ‘68 was that the ‘68 had side reflectors on the rear quarter panels , and a small change to the grill logo. Your picture labeled ‘68 shows the grill logo change but not the side reflector. I wonder if the picture labeled ‘68 is a ‘67 that someone changed the grill logo on to imitate the ‘68. As I recall, the reflector was a federally mandated change for ‘68 that included all cars sold in the US. In ‘69 those reflectors had to be lighted.


44 posted on 11/17/2018 9:56:45 AM PST by Wingy (It's nice to be nice to the nice. (Stolen from Bagster who stole it from MASH))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Wingy

Yes, there may be a few errors along the way. I tried to find quality sources. 67-68 were my favorite years too.

The Mustang retros (late 90s to nearly the present) are about the only retros, of any make or model, that I care for.


46 posted on 11/17/2018 10:01:10 AM PST by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Wingy
Image result for etl freerepublic mustang

Image result for etl freerepublic mustang

47 posted on 11/17/2018 10:03:17 AM PST by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson