Posted on 09/17/2018 10:36:00 PM PDT by ransomnote
I will truly be, "he who knows things".
If they ask me how I know things, I say something about a little birdie or I heard it around the popsicle stand. That kinda thing. Hahaha.
We cannot abandon the less fortunate to their ignorance. We are our brother's keepers. Right?
Hahaha.
Bagster
Where's the fun in that, G?
Bagster
Bagster
PANIC IN DC
SESSIONS CLAS LETTER TO SC JUSTICES 1&2 RE: RECUSAL, UNRECUSAL, AND CLARITY RE: CONFLICTS BASED ON UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL [TODAY].
HIGHEST COURT AUTHORITY APPROVAL
Q
Just a question...since the Chief Justice has “authority over” the fisa court, could the “highest court authority approval “ refer to the declassification of the fisa court documents?
Not their “approval” of Sessions recusal or unrecusal?
This analysis ignores the role of the Chief Justice as overseer of the FISC - it is in that role that SESSIONS is acting.
Heyyyyy.
Perfectamundo!
Bagster
not the declassification per se but the corruption of the FISC by invalid / illegal / bogus FISA applications, perjury & obstruction of justice by our highest law enforcement + intel agencies as well as at least one Judge Rudy Contreras being recused from the Flynn matters
Blu is absolutely right.
Everybody knows old, white men are the devil.
Bagster
The SCOTUS is the highest court. Their approval of Sessions' unrecusal prevents the leftists from using a lower federal court judge to issue an injunction against Sessions' unrecusal.
Last week, Sessions directed all US Attorneys nationwide to push back against nationwide injunctions issued by lower federal court judges. This has been a problem for decades, wherein the commies judge-shop to get injunctions against any action by Republicans that they want to stop.
Bagster
That makes more sense, but not really: Since Sessions has recused himself from all things Russian, any request to the FISA court re: de-classification of FISA documents relating to Russia would have top come from someone other than Sessions.
Daze de debbil!
He’s only 100% certain.
Still plenty of time to get to the required 188%.
Sessions is now “un-recused”.
Wrong track. POTUS has authority to declassify without any involvement of SCOTUS or FISC.
The Q post above is important.
The best estimate of behind the scenes movements, an estimate that fits facts, is that AG Sessions has finally acceded to POTUS’s demands to un-recuse, is therefore informing two SCOTUS Justices of the un-recusal, and getting clarity on Art. 3 Sec 2. original and exclusive jurisdiction for a pending Petition for Certiorari to try foreign agents in SCOTUS, agents such as Steele, Mifsud, Halper, Downer, Johnson and many others charged in a scheme to plot an overthrow a duly elected President.
We know publicly that Steele has been fighting an extradition order and he will lose. We can be assured the others are in similar straits.
The FISA court has no authority over Session’s recusal. The decision to recuse himself was based upon AG standards, guidelines, and protocol and not some FISA directive.
Normally I don’t engage in such matters but REALLY, REALLY DUMB. Have these people not been paying attention for the past 1-1/2 years? Are to we believe this self proclaimed expert in constitutional law doesn’t know how the FISC operates in conjunction with the D-J? PANIC in DC!
http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/19/judges-recusal-michael-flynn-case-damages-fbi-doj/
Yes, but Sessions would observe polity by informing SCOTUS that he was recused and is now un-recused before requesting clarity on conflicts based on declassified material.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.