Posted on 09/01/2018 9:49:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
I am hoping your interpretation is more accurate than mine.
You said: There are so many layers to this game. I just want it to be over with the good guys winning.
....
Same here. But I am supremely confidant that the good guys will win. My only concern is collateral damage when the bad guys try to take innocent people with them as they go down.
Prayers always.
Hah! I am looking forward to seeing the Donald let the UN have it. Go, POTUS! MAGA!
Ticks me off. Maybe the President should hire from outside the East Coast. Still do not believe it. “Anonymous source”= no one.
A better question is how often are Qs posts about something already posted on existing threads. The anons are getting ahead of him.
At the link in Q drop #2083, at the 24:09 minute mark, Kavanaugh is asked where he was on 9/11:
https://youtu.be/Tocc8EolxXg?t=1450
At 26:05 minute mark, Kavanaugh is asked about the “law in war” and specifically, the subject of “armed conflict law” is introduced. :)
https://youtu.be/Tocc8EolxXg?t=1568
” under Supreme Court
precedent right for them again there’s a
Supreme Court decision that said that
American citizens who collaborated with
Nazi saboteurs were tried by the
military is that correct that is correct
I think a couple of were executed yeah
so if anybody doubts there’s a
long-standing history in this country
that your constitutional rights follow
you wherever you go but you don’t have a
constitutional right to turn on your own
government collaborate with the enemy of
the nation you’ll be treated differently”
“so the bottom line is on every American
says to no you have constitutional
rights but you do not have a
constitutional right to collaborate with
the enemy there’s a body of law well
developed long before 9/11 that
understood the difference between basic
criminal law and the law of armed
conflict”
:D
And you carry it with such saintly forbearance.
I’m getting 404 also.
You are technically correct. I was in court once waiting for a hearing, and the magistrate judge was hearing cases on speeding tickets that were issued in Camp Pendleton and also some Indian reservation matters. The federal judges who are appointed don’t hear those things, they give them to the magistrate judges, who are hired by the court as federal employees. Those judges hear discovery disputes and small matters. The parties have to agree to have their trials in front of them.
It means he’s like a zillion other lawyers and was inspired by Atticus Finch.
Well, well, well....now both qanon.pub and qanon.app are down!
Coincidence? :)
http://we-go-all.net/q.html keeps trying to complete loading. It’s either slow or down. There are others. There’s a backup site for Qanon.pub. I’ll look for the link. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that three (or more) websites hosting Q drops just went off line.
Would be hilarious if Corsi got one of Mueller’s indictments for lying to him about forgetting the date he spoke to Roger Stone or something else stupid. Maybe Corsi can tell the Mule about his friend Q.
From the q drop:
“...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tocc8EolxXg&feature=youtu.be
[26:00]
Interesting line of questions?
Normal?
Military Law v. Criminal Law.
Think EO.
Think HRC panic.
Do you believe in coincidences?
You have more than you know.
Q”
If that vid is of LG asking some interesting questions, then it’s about to ‘get real’.
Placemark
Thank you for posting the drop, Mairdie! :D
It’s so good to “see” you around again!
LG looking like he has a spine? Flipped?
Starts around 26:00 mark.
Try qmap.pub
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.