Skip to comments.
Q Anon: 09/01/18 Trust Trump's Plan
qmap.pub ^
| 09/1/18
| FReepers, vanity
Posted on 09/01/2018 9:49:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,781-1,800, 1,801-1,820, 1,821-1,840 ... 2,201-2,208 next last
To: pbear8
Sweet. Where is my sharpie!
To: AllAmericanGirl44
But I read it as dreams others reported having, no PM’s dreams.
Correct me if I’m wrong. True. However, he doesn't mention dreams he rejects as plausible or valid--at least not without explaining why he rejects one. But I've never known him to post a dream of anyone that he disapproved of. Actually, all the dreams he's mentioned are similar to his own or his wife's as I understand it.
1,802
posted on
09/05/2018 1:33:30 PM PDT
by
JockoManning
(http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
To: TXBubba
1,803
posted on
09/05/2018 1:34:27 PM PDT
by
JockoManning
(http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
To: edzo4
Is it just me, or does jack look like Tyrion Lannister?
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
Reposting 2092 because I left off part of it before. Sorry!
To: ransomnote
From the Sara Carter link at #2092 (I bolded my favorite part):
"However, President Trump, who has been under pressure from some DOJ officials not to release the classified documents, “could always change his mind and it’s not a guarantee that it will happen, but the indications are that it more than likely will possibly be before the end of this week ,” said a U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the subject." https://saraacarter.com/president-trump-may-declassify-the-20-fisa-docs-congress-wants/
To: ransomnote
I wonder if John McCain’s name is in those docs?
1,808
posted on
09/05/2018 1:51:35 PM PDT
by
buffaloguy
(MSM: Wind up dolls of the DNC.)
To: CJ Wolf
I wonder whether those women in Hand Maid’s garb are protestors or Senate interns?
Confused...
BG
1,809
posted on
09/05/2018 1:54:04 PM PDT
by
buffaloguy
(MSM: Wind up dolls of the DNC.)
To: ransomnote
Maybe I missed it before, but it looks like the targets of accusation have enlarged from just POTUS (e.g., claiming he wants to release docs to protect himself) to include anyone encouraging the POTUS to release docs (e.g., insinuating those asking POTUS are trying to cover themselves).
This is where POTUS’s repeated comments about “I don’t want to but, I may have to get involved,” come into play. POTUS and Q Team knew the enemy would portray release of docs as distraction from the Mueller circus. If the MSM was still pretending to be interesting in uncovering the truth, they’d be demanding the release of the documents.
To: CJ Wolf
And I just went out today and bought a Pair of New Balance cross trainers!
To: edzo4
Thanks!
1,812
posted on
09/05/2018 2:05:49 PM PDT
by
BlessedBeGod
(To restore all things in Christ~~Appeasing evil is cowardice~~Francis is temporary. Hell is forever.)
To: Swordmaker
OK, I read his analysis and he said he went in and changed the default (which the people running the quiries are using) to "criminal indictments" and got a much lower number.
Yes, I agree that Federal Courts don't handle speeding tickets, I think he was using a poor example of "petty offenseives", but they do have many other things that are not indictments that get sealed. Like search warrants.
By the way, I'm still working on updating my chart based on your input. I've been pretty busy and haven't had a chance to finish that, but I will.
To: ransomnote; 1_Rain_Drop; 103198; 31R1O; 4Liberty; Hemingway's Ghost; acrolect; Aevery_Freeman; ...
To: NorthstarMom; NotQuiteCricket; Noumenon; numberonepal; Ol' Sox; OLDCU; oldngray; Oorang; Oratam; ...
To: buffaloguy
I think it’s only a matter of how careful We-Don’t-Say-His-Name was. They thought she couldn’t lose the election (rigged) so he may have been careless. I think some of his crimes WILL surface because it would be impossible to tell the story without mentioning him.
To: Jack Black
It's a little strange that it hasn't been discussed here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I saw the OANN Report, and felt sorry for them, because I like the network. But they got suckered.
No one familiar with Q takes it seriously.
As I said yesterday, the only significance of the "Report" is that Q has now moved to a new level of exposure (Cable News).
To: bagster
Looks like RICO evidence to me...
To: Jack Black
Very well put. Even if Q were proved to be a hoax, to some extent it doesn't matter now. The work done by the anons, interpreters and FreeQs has tremendous value. The finger pointing at the moon is not the moon. Now we see the moon. M-O-O-N that spells jaque Noir trying to weasel his way to a permanent seat in the thread.
Be gone! Scat! Bye Felicia
1,819
posted on
09/05/2018 2:35:27 PM PDT
by
blu
(WWG1WGA)
To: blu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,781-1,800, 1,801-1,820, 1,821-1,840 ... 2,201-2,208 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
