Posted on 03/28/2018 7:15:36 PM PDT by ransomnote
That cant be true. That random fell over there says Q is some righ Gay media dude. C'mon, man. Who ya gonna believe?
Your post is a bit rambling, not sure if you’re being serious.
I know it’s easy to get into a jocular mood on these threads, but this is serious.
Sessions refers to Wray by name. Rather than try to state my impression, which might influence yours, read Sessions' letter of march 29, looking for references to people and positions.
I was paying attention to signs of cooperation (or not) or division of oversight between Sessions/Huber and Rosenstein/Mueller sort of thing.
I feel like that dude is trying to damage the Q program, this thread, this forum and by extension, this very nation and yes, the entire world. Q is important. Very bloodydamn important.
Was that serious enough for you? I'm gonna log off. I shouldn post when I'm pissed off. Later, all.
Tea party caught the eye off FBI/NSA in 2008-9. Spooks signed up on all the conservative boards and awaited their assignment.
Per their usual modus operandi the “confidential informant” was probably an FBI agent provocateur and it took the guy 8 months the convince the cletus’ that the only way those somalis can be stopped is if they did something themselves and then provided them with plans and material sources.
Remember, this is the same side that admitted in court they buried incriminating shit in Richard Jewels backyard to bust him unjustly and ended up driving him to an early grave...
While Sessions does mention some names initially, his latter paragraphs utilize titles as he is sort of outlining the duties. He used the term Inspector General several times before using the words DAG.
Altogether, there was around 7 Inspector General, 3 Attorney General, 2 DAG, and Senior Federal Prosecutor. Given that the term DAG was within those paragraphs, I would not assign very much importance to the term as being indicative of any future action with respect to RR. JMHO
Hey, take it easy Kemosabi. My apologies if I upset you.
You feel like who is trying to damage the Q program?
http://digg.com/2018/palantir-cambridge-analytica
http://fortune.com/2017/03/05/peter-thiels-palantir-is-powering-trumps-immigration-agenda/
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-38315682
More on Theil/Palantir
The cabal is not fond of a renegade gay billionaire who agrees w/Trump. Palantir is possibly being used for *extreme vetting* and *predictive policing*.
Not sure how comfortable I am with the predictive crime aspect. NOT libertarian, IMO.
I have always felt the the Struck-Stroke love affair was a canard to give cover to an organized coup.
Hmm, I set up a twitter account during Trump’s campaign and I think I made 5 or 6 tweets or twits and I just couldn’t figure out the ground rules whatsoever.
So now I just read a few peoples’ twitter thingies. But I never get that message, I just read.
What happens when you click this link?
https://twitter.com/LarrySchweikart
Sessions also referred to Horowitz by name, in conjunction with this set of investigations.
The second half of p2 and first half of p3 are clinical descriptions of "the system," so use of titles there is natural.
And in closing, Sessions exhorts his recipients to contact him (Sessions) directly.
Rosenstein is not mentioned by name, at all.
I note that he did use the Name and title of the heads of the department-initially.
However later on, when he was writing about the duties, he used the titles. Several times used the term Inspector General, Attorney General, DAG, Senior Fed. Prosecutor.
This person, at post 662 started the whole thing.
...the ‘lovers’ cover-up ...
_______________________
Has anyone ever read one word of affection, one flirty comment or one reference to each other as a sex object in ALL the Strock/Page emails?
How do you exchange so many emails/texts and never say *honey* or *miss you* or *can’t wait to get you alone*?
They weren’t lovers. I’ll bet on it.
The one that thought they had identified Q as being someone who could profit from shutting down the current monopoly/social media sites is the one that was upsetting to bagster, I think.
When Gore va Bush was sent to SCOTUS my dad wrote the nomicltute of laws that it would be decided under and the names of each justice and how they would vote on a slip of paper and gave it to the county judge.
When the decision came in the Judge opened it and dad was 100% correct. Judge told dad if he was twenty years younger he’d nominate him for the federal bench. Dad told him “ If I were ten years younger I’d take it!”
I'm thinking back to the bombings of Serbia. What wouldn't the Clintons do? :(
D for Director supposedly=Comey
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.