Posted on 03/16/2018 7:38:19 PM PDT by ransomnote
Post 619 is interesting in its meaning and tribunals being "implied"
I post in more than a needed for some context. I always think its a good idea to back and read old posts again and again to gain more insight and understanding. I agree, the idea of Military Tribunals has some uncomfortable connotations. Will see
Q Post #619
Note the last drops on the other board.
Think logically.
Refer to past crumbs
. YOU HAVE MORE THAN YOU KNOW.
Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/
potential
crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries?
How do you defuse a bomb?
Knowledge of which wires/strings to cut?
Q
Q Post #4 and part repeated in Post #6
POTUS will not be addressing nation on any of these issues as
people begin to be indicted and must remain neutral for pure
optical reasons. To suggest this is the plan is false and should
be common sense.
Focus on Military Intellingence/ State Secrets and why might
that be used vs any three letter agency
What SC decision opened the door for a sitting President to
activate - what must be showed?
Q Post #11 and repeated in part (small part)
Key:
Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA
No approval or congressional oversight
State Secrets upheld under SC
Who is the Commander and Chief of the military?
Under what article can the President impose MI take over
investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must
present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost
this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and
directly serves POTUS.
Another clue in Q Post 23 in reference to CIA outposts
It’s a hint that Snowden is in a safe place.
The / one connotation is that the tribunal is the (only) way for mil to investigate rogue (seditious) agencies.
I could see Twitter manipulation when I read back over the thread today, but last night in real time it was the shoot out at the OK Corral and our side was winning.
SO:
1) Hillary originally has a sprain on the hand she used to catch her step slip. Possible.
2) Hillary then is diagnosed with a ‘hairline fracture’ (distinctive diagnosis to explain how this was missed on the 1st go-around). Possible.
3) Hillary is seen with the sleeve extended to totally hide her hand and wrist.
4) No sling. Is she hiding the fact that she did not injure the wrist? But then, she could pretend with a sling. Or an air cast. Slings aren’t essential, but they are more comfortable, initially, and elevate the limb for the first few days. In any event, she displayed her orthopedic boot. Why not display her cast? Her wide sleeve would slide right over it, anyway.
5) Hillary is *advised* to not fly while she *heals*. (What about a fractured wrist would preclude flying in a private plane? The possibility of a blood clot? From a *hairline* fracture?)Any clinicians out there have an answer? I once cracked a metatarsal and there was a bruise from internal bleeding.
6) Did she have a seizure? That would rule out flying for a while.
Nothing is ever straight forward with these people.
This is how your Snowden tidbit article ends:
Snowden was granted asylum in Russia back in 2013 after he leaked secret information from the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs and has been there ever since.
lol
Am thinking that issue alone . . . is the reason for the use of tribunals. Repeated 1,000 times, corruption too deep in all agencies. Which make sense to me. Growing up we knew communist factor were infiltrating our government. Last 10 to 12 years never heard once (maybe a little about Muslim Brotherhood) bad actors infiltrating our government. Its got to be deep.
ph
“I could see Twitter manipulation when I read back over the thread today, but last night in real time it was the shoot out at the OK Corral and our side was winning.”
That is great.
Sounds like a worthwhile idea, but I would not be your girl for that. Not a fan. Don’t know squat about the Dead.
:)
(Insert graphic here of Trump dressed as Wyatt Earp. ....If only this old lady had some tech skills....)
The live chat was just talking about Military jets flying over LA.
Anybody seeing Military jets circling LA?
I did go out and look and did see some jets
but I live in a flight path.
I’m going to go back out and watch to see if I can tell
it they are circling.
I think there are fewer drones than the MSM/pinkos are trying to make us think via Fake Media, astroturfing crap and so on. That’s why they have to increasingly censor twatter, youtube and so on.
Also in flight path. Nothing unusual here in fly over country
I don’t know how to post the picture, but here’s the link to the page that has it:
https://lovewillbringustogether.wordpress.com/2017/04/07/theres-a-new-sheriff-in-town/
I don’t know how to post the picture, but here’s the link to the page that has it:
https://lovewillbringustogether.wordpress.com/2017/04/07/theres-a-new-sheriff-in-town/
Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself?
Anyone know the answers to these questions? What conditions must present itself: maybe insurrection, widespread rioting with deaths, etc? Or states in rebellion such as CA practically is?
The Fox promo was just video and music no speaking. So you’re not missing anything with no sound.
Thanks. I saw a story about that a few days ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.