Q Anon: (3/16/18) Continued from Tuesday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/16/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This is a shout out to all the Anons who have worked so hard for months on the Q boards to bake Q's drops for us. THANQ, Anons!.

The Q team doesn't like it when they receive praise, but hey, they don't have time to read websites (FR) and besides, they can't stop me!

THANQ, Q!!!!
It just needed to be said.

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3639519/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639029/posts?page=23#23

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

[Melian]

Q did say to watch for the loudest voices...Brennan was frothing!

[txhurl]

Yeh, and his stoopid little sycophant sidekick Power is tryna be all gangstab*tch, too.

[defconw]

Bookmarq

[TruthWillWin]

You may have something there?

[meyer]

Re: 1354, that was interesting, but it’s hard to say. There is a good chance that LEO was in the area after the fact and may have spoiled the scene. Driver claims she used the parking brake as the service brakes completely failed.

Parking brake has completely mechanical linkage, not prone to remote tampering. But service brakes have anti-lock which allows electronic control of all 4 wheel’s brakes.

In my mind, one scenario is that the car was remotely altered so that the brakes didn’t work and perhaps the engine was revved up as well. She pulled the parking brake which is only moderately effective and only affects the rear wheels.

The video brings other possibilities to mind, and must be considered as well.

[txhurl]

Did you know *today* is McCabe’s birthday? Some other bad ones: Chelsea Clinton, Reince Priebus, Mitt Romney, Harvey Weinstein...

[Spitzensparkin1]

hoosiermama wrote: Did they poison the Russian and his daughter?

The ones feeding Steele the made up stuff for the fake dossier? Yes, and they went out of their way to make it look like Putin did it, too.

Hillary’s MO is all over this...
Wag the Dog2

SS!

[hoosiermama]

Make sense to me. Would fit into her initial plan of action to start a war with Russia

[Bigg Red]

I would not be at all surprised to learn that Pelosi, Schumer, McTurtle, and Ryan were working together. Despicable.

[little jeremiah]

Commander Has An Outstanding Solution = CHAOS beginning letters

He’s also known as the warrior monk.

---

I read that he preferred to be called the warrior monk rather than Mad Dog. I did not know the CHAOS meaning, thank you.

[JockoManning]

both your posts are quite logical, to me. Thanks.

[USMC79to83]

Think about Little Fat Boy's cousin, poisoned by nerve agent at the airport...

If we believe that NK was a Clown op, then the Clowns had a hand in this.

Similar MO?

Must start a war to distract from the global swamp draining?

[little jeremiah]

Hmm, may be spot on with that Magic reference.

[slag]

There has been talk on these threads of military tribunals. I can’t find anywhere that Q has ever mentioned it.(if someone can find one, I stand corrected) The only reference I can find comes from Dilley.(whom I know a lot of people follow but I need some salt)

Can someone explain how US citizens would be tried in military tribunals. The SC has ruled that no US civilian can be tried by the military. If military is used the MSM would scream Coup and the populous wouldn’t go along.

Just trying to understand the methodology of how this will all take place.

[bagster]

Allegedly pending indictments.

Thank you.

[ichabod1]

Well, we’re not sure, but I would say for military tribunals to work we would have to be under martial law. We are already operating under a declared (quietly) state of emergency. If that scenario played out presumably the msm would be gagged.

[bagster]

-- What are the meanings of "magical" that you hypothesize? --

Just tossing out Obama the 'Magic Negro' - LA Times - Mar 19, 2007

I like this. Both possible and wonderful at the same time. Good thinking.

[txhurl]

The United States is lost to the deep state, they now must focus that none of our allies - or enemies, for that matter - get any funny ideas about draining their own swamp.

BTW, I’ve completely abandoned that 5% chance that Mueller is gonna do any shade of the Right Thing.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

[Aquamarine]

Mar 18 2018 02:17:42 (EDT) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 5f0f27 br>705264
Why are trips allowed?
Whitelist.
Q

To further incriminate themselves? Ranbaxy