Posted on 03/02/2018 12:58:27 AM PST by ransomnote
Yes. Sentence structure seems odd on some of these also but I’m too tired to see the why of it.
Looks like missing words in those sentences.
Seems like “What I say a class action lawsuit?” might be “What did I say about a class action lawsuit?” or something like that.
Who leaked Vault7 to WL?
We believe the info as leaked by Seth Rich
Who returned fire?
HRC + DWS + MS13 = [SR 187]
- Below - I believe this describes Snowden mission
OP Name: Fiddler
@Snowden
Mission 1: Infiltrate
Snowden infiltrates the NSA
Mission 2: Centralize
Mission 3: Secure
Snowden grabs the tools
Mission 4: Expose to HARM
(Date)
When did Snowden release info? Did it harm the NSA? Did it harm national security? Was the goal to marginalize / neutralize the only group that could expose them
(WH interference)
(WH directive)
The White Hut was involved
Mission 5: Russia LINK
(2013 timeline of events)
What is the timeline of events for the Russia collusion story? When did the female lawyer from Fusion GPS try to sell her HRC dirt story to the Trump campaign? When did the Clowns start to lay the trap? How did that "collusion" story evolve? Lay out the timeline...
(1/17/14)
What news broke on this date?
Yes it does.
Where does "Fiddler" fit in?
OP Name: Fiddler
@Snowden
And what is this all about?
Mission 6: Fiddler > Ghost-PRIME
Mission 7: CLAS
Mission 8: Whistle Blower traps - jobs C-3567k
Mission 9: Censorship
CLAS +relay
Is Seth Rich "Fiddler?" Fiddler is important, whoever it is.
Looking over that speech by Obama on Jan 17, 2014, it’s clear the speech says exactly the opposite of what Obama and the deep state were all about.
FReepers like you amaze me! Awesome find here! WOW!
Good night all. I know I’ll log in in the morning and you guys will have figured this all out for me. :)
At least I hope so, my head is swimming.
Thanks, that’s very kind of you. You give me too much credit thought, all I did was a search of the date from Q’s post. Not Google, of course.
Good night. I’m sure those Freepers who are better than I am at finding the tough details will get it done.
I searched it as well. Came up with a big fat nothing burger!
He mentions Podesta in there.
And talk about stating the opposite of what you intend:
“the world expects us to stand up for the principle that every person has the right to think and write and form relationships freely — because individual freedom is the wellspring of human progress.”
The only clue here is the word “progress” which to them signals the totalitarianism that is progressivism.
I missed that! Course I am still reading it.
Filthy lies:
“What I did not do is stop these programs wholesale — not only because I felt that they made us more secure, but also because nothing in that initial review, and nothing that I have learned since, indicated that our intelligence community has sought to violate the law or is cavalier about the civil liberties of their fellow citizens.”
I’m still reading it too.
That kind of addresses one of my questions. Can they control people that we wouldnt suspect capable of a shooting; the answer is yes. It seems they have chosen thus far to use people we would think capable of snapping - but that seems like cya. Sounds like they COULD use people we dont think they could use.
Seems the people would try everything and go anywhere and could not get away from it. Drove them crazy.
Am not recalling anything else helpful. But now we can assume this would be the black hats doing experiments hmmm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.