Skip to comments.Q Anon: (2/21/18) Continued from Monday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration
Posted on 02/21/2018 12:06:33 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner (i.e., personal attacks).
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize Q Anon information into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
No it is not. Who are you associating me with? What is your purpose. Please explain in plain english if you have something to say.
And as far as a computer coordinating the aggregating or summing process, that is, the way I see it, the simple summing that goes on (precinct to county, then conunty to state) now, by the candidates and their supporters.
Of course...he was Skull and Bones - just like W and GHW.
Could be a sting?
What “side” permits them to murder ELECTED PRESIDENTS?
What “side” permits them to make “insurance”
to take down ELECTED PRESIDENTS?
It is sedition.
Am I reading this correctly?
Almost 1 million more people voted in the 2016 Presidential election (total votes 9,415,638) then voted in 2012 (total votes 8,474,138)?
That’s a huge difference.
The rogue elements have to be isolated from information, access, and freedom of movement. Money they can get anywhere.
I think that what generally is trying to describe is similar to a voting scheme that was programmed into the Gems system, called fractional voting. It’s not exactly weighted average, and it was uncovered in investigation of election fraud in Tennessee.
In concept, the machines had a feature that allowed programming of the % of the vote that would be assigned to the categories. This was all in the machine, but not seen by the whole numbers that the poll workers would see.
Bev Harris wrote a book about it. She’s a Dem but she has said that she suspects that Hillary stole at least 5 or 6 states in this election. However, without access to those areas can’t tell for sure.
The chatter that I heard was that in the Northern Blue States that flipped Red, the Pubbies had a campaign GOTV that told the voters to use paper ballots, and not the machines to avoid fraud. I have no idea if this is true.
Here’s a link to some detailed information on how the scam works:
SUMMARY OF THE INFORMATION
This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States.
The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes.
This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.
Or a diversion effort.
You shouldn't be offended for standing up for your point of view; nor should you be shocked that some people reject your point of view.
It is radically different from the notion of visible subtotals being later manipulated in the tally process.
Just another false flag, expect a dozen or more before Nov.
LMAO! That's why he was on Face The Nation Feb 18th. Or was this live from GITMO?!
Nah, the Q swarm groupthink mentality (Woozle effect?) doesn't allow for that.
Rev. Jesse Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton for two.
And Jim Jones?
Other states have other brands.
Keep in mind this illicit cyber control is an ongoing process. Not all states have fallen in with Soros. I can imagine that GEMS was his response to not having control over all states or all key states and to have a backup in place in case management at local levels failed to deliver.
To me, the telltale sign was his blatant backing of certain candidates for State SOS offices. Out of the things Soros (meaning his managers) could be backing, he funds candidates for these state offices who just happen to certify elections.
All the evidence points strongly to cyber theft of elections. To me, there is not even a question that power players are attempting to control election outcomes through software, just like they back their chosen candidates and just like all other means they use to control politics.
You are welcome. I haven’t had time to delve totally into it. I had watched a video she had on you tube - it’s now disabled. IIRC, they also have additional tampering methods with these darned machines, which is used in our state.
Every election, almost St. Louis has some sort of problem that delays their tally, and then when the votes from the rural areas are in, St. Louis tallies come in and exceed the rural vote so the Dems win, unless it’s a blow out. Harder to cheat then.
I think I need to check your comments daily. Especially with little time to read for hours. I will check out that memo.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.