Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Does the Tesla Look So Fake in Space? We Asked a Chemist
Live Science ^ | February 7, 2018 04:10pm ET | Laura Geggel, Senior Writer |

Posted on 02/07/2018 4:01:07 PM PST by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: GingisK

The space roadster will inspire more kids than the limited reach of $100k of grant money.

I’m an engineer because the Apollo guys. Inspiration.


41 posted on 02/07/2018 8:42:44 PM PST by Professional Engineer (This account has been banned or suspended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Aliska

I grew up in Amarillo, and Cadillac Ranch is what passes for culture. LOL


42 posted on 02/07/2018 8:54:58 PM PST by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

Excellent


43 posted on 02/07/2018 9:45:16 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Aliska
stays in our solar system but then won't it be like a tiny planet or asteroid in our solar system?

Yes.

Apparently, Elon's roadster is in an elliptical orbit around the sun, with an aphelion of 2.61 AU (earth-sun distances), almost to the orbit of Ceres, the largest of the asteroids, and a perihelion of 0.98 AU, just inside earth's orbit.

There is a vanishingly small but nonzero probability that, on some future orbit, it could come back do damage, either to one of our satellites or to someone on the ground, were it to somehow survive reentry.

44 posted on 02/07/2018 10:14:45 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jerod
It was a piece of crass showmanship that even P. T. Barnum would refer to as uncouth.

We need more of PT's type of uncouth.

Even PT could not have imagined 1950s sci-fi space rockets, much less landing real rockets ass-first, in the 1950s fictional manner.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvTxQq8Wbe0

The roadster owner's booster recovery solution decisively beats that of NASA:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aCOyOvOw5c

Ker-plash. Chutes deflate. Where's the Navy? LOL!

45 posted on 02/07/2018 10:51:15 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer

A car in space is stupid. Apollo was not. I am also a child of Apollo, and was transfixed by that program. Young people of today are smart enough to see the “car in space” as a useless stunt.


46 posted on 02/08/2018 4:05:06 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer
The rocket needed a payload as part of testing. It could just as easily been a blob of concrete.

Exactly, but way cooler than a blob of concrete.

47 posted on 02/08/2018 4:09:51 AM PST by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson