Tick Tock boom, Hannity tweet

Twitter ^

[Kalamata]

Will testimony given be public or private?

[arrogantsob]

Moore is not guilty of anything untoward. That ball of lies is rapidly unwinding.

[arrogantsob]

Moore is not guilty of anything untoward. That ball of lies is rapidly unwinding.

[myerson]

You are assuming a lot about Moore. Nothing has been proven. If McConnell would spend $30 million to defeat Moore in the primary, how much do you think he’s spend to obtain lies and liars to defame Moore? I have an open mind at this point and will wait before forming an opinion, but am highly skeptical about those who would convict Moore based on unsubstantiated allegations about matters that date back 40 years. I think Hannity should be ashamed of himself—I am very disappointed in him.

[arrogantsob]

Not even Christ.

[arrogantsob]

There is no credible evidence of any abuse by Moore. It was obvious from the beginning that this was a character assassination attempt by the Goebbelsmedia.

[Dawgreg]

Hannity can tick tock his sorry azz off for all I care. What a stinkin’, full of himself fraud he is!!

[bray]

Fox News has been universally against him and never questioned the truthfulness of these women. The stories are questionable and have found to be false especially with the lack of a phone to the forged signature.

[Pelham]

“Hannity publicly switched his opinion of Moore within hours of his interview, which was the most damning proof of Moore’s guilt”

Yeah, the very same Hannity who missed the significance of the ‘DA’ appended to the Moore signature in Deborah Gibson’s yearbook.

Those are the initials of Roy Moore’s secretary Delbra Adams when she would stamp Moore’s signature onto court documents. Like the divorce decree that accuser Debra Gibson received in Moore’s own court in 1999. Which she obviously used as the source when she forged Moore’s signature onto her yearbook. Not to mention the fact that the ink she used doesn’t match.

Allred isn’t about to let that yearbook be examined by anyone other than her collaborators in the press. And while her client Gibson is a liar she’s not fool enough to repeat her story under oath. But it did its job of fooling Hannity.

[Yaelle]

Moore was not honest about something to do with specifically seeking out Teen girls when he was in his 30s. You’re right. That doesn’t mean he is guilty of anything and he has all the “right” enemies against him for political reasons. That doesn’t make him pure.

[Yaelle]

Just because the deep state and their media paid curs are attacking him doesn’t mean they didn’t find a weak subject for Moore. Nothing has been proven. He was clearly dissembling, HIMSELF, which tells me more than all the accusers in the world, lined up and sobbing with their ambulance chasers beside them.

Hannity is more honest than partisan and I like my men like that. He wants the seat to stay R as much as you or I do.

[JudyinCanada]

You are right, MM....

I have been critical of Sean’s ranting, especially when he cuts off his guests, but he does serve a purpose. We would give credit to a dem for being so persistent. As annoying as it is, I give Sean credit for being like a dog with a bone when he is mad, and for having all of the good guests.

[Yaelle]

There is no credible evidence of any abuse by Moore. It was obvious from the beginning that this was a character assassination attempt by the Goebbelsmedia.

---

That is what I assumed as well from the beginning. Moore changed my mind with his dissembling, but I feel that girls are in no danger with him in the Senate so I hope he wins.

[Yaelle]

The signature is 100% meaningless to me, friend. The only significance it has is, if it can be proven to be a forgery, it shows that Gloria and that witness are not credible. But it doesn’t prove anything. If it’s genuine, it doesn’t prove anything. After 40years, there is rarely proof of sexual indecency, and he may never have committed a crime at all.

I am just being honest, and his interview responses, especially the one where he clearly was lying about his MEMORY because that is how MEMORY WORKS, make me know he has something he wants to hide. Maybe he did have a teen fetish when he was unmarried. Also, the sheer number of people that have come forward with knowledge of his predilections pushes me to think there may be an ember under all the smoke. But I don’t know! I wasn’t there.

And as long as he isn’t a threat to victims today, I want him to hold that seat (or someone else with a R, preferably a non swamp R. Which is rare, and he has one). Holding the Senate is one of the few things we can attempt to save our country. His past, however creepy, is not important right now but I’m not playing the Moore is a Saint game.

[Songcraft]

"The Hannity detractors are funny. I don’t watch him because I don’t watch TV, but... What does Hannity pull down for income? What are his ratings? Tell me some more about how dumb he is..."

NFL Commissioner, Roger Goodell makes many millions more than Hannity makes.   Do you believe that money somehow makes him smart, even though he's wrong about everything, and is running the NFL into the ground?

And a few months ago (August, 2017), Rachel Maddow had the highest cable news show ratings that month.   Did that make her smart in your eyes, even though she is wrong about every issue, and has since been running her timeslot into the ground for her network?

Hannity was completely wrong about Moore.   He went from one day saying Moore is innocent until proven guilty, to the next day saying Moore is guilty until proven innocent, a total flip-flop (as did all of the Fox phony-baloney blabbermouths).   At the time, they all said they based their flip-flops on the new physical evidence produced (the yearbook signature), which turned out to be completely bogus.

I never watched the Rachel Maddow show (and never will), and now I am done with the NFL, and I'm done with the Fox phonies (including Hannity and Judge Jeanine Pirro).

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell

---

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow

---

Geniuses because of salary and ratings?

[DiogenesLamp]

He’s not actively harming teens. But those of you who think everything said about him has to be a lie are showing poor judgment.

I think some of what they say is true. I believe the women who say they dated him. I believe the other two who are accusing him of impropriety are misleading people as to what really happened.

One of the possibilities I mentioned on another site regarding the woman claiming to be 14 at the time was that she passed herself off as older, and she probably had the figure to make it work. I've personally seen 12 year old girls that could pass for adults, and so I suspect this woman was an early developer.

I think she exaggerated her story, and I think she may have mislead him as to her age, and so she has now come back to pull this "gotcha".

Hannity publicly switched his opinion of Moore within hours of his interview, which was the most damning proof of Moore’s guilt.

Hannity's opinion doesn't prove anything. It isn't evidence.

Guilt over what, we cannot know. We can’t trust every accuser, and trusting Allred is pretty spotty. But Hannity interviews people DAILY. He knows who is lying to him.

I think what happened is people started asserting that dating teenage girls is the equivalent of sexually molesting a 14 year old. The two things were announced at the same time, and it created the appearance that if you admitted to the one, people would regard you as having done the other.

I believe Roy Moore dated teenagers when he was in his 30s, but because of the atmosphere that had been created by linking his dating with accusations of sexual molestation, Moore did not want to admit he dated teenagers. *THAT* is what caused him to feel the need to be evasive. I think he felt that he couldn't admit to either charge, because the two things had become linked in the public mind.

He should have said, "Yes, I dated teenagers when I was in my 30s, but that one accusation is complete crap. "

Now I argue on other websites as well, and on the very day of that interview, I argued with several people who equated "dating teenagers" with "child molester." They simply refused to separate the two things in their own mind, regarding the one to be the same as the other.

I think this was Moore's dilemma, and he did not know how to address it properly, and the manner in which Hanity seemingly made a big deal of him dating teenagers didn't help anything.

[Road Warrior ‘04]

What news did he break for that trip? Did he get Assange to tell him who sent Wikileaks the DNC and Podesta materials?

Just the fact that he was able to get the interview, when no one else could. It's all part of his tick-tock BS! And, it might have been a good interview, if he hadn't repeat, repeat, repeat and repeat again, then ask Assange a question, only to interrupt in a nano-second. I was screaming at my radio to let the man answer. Like the rest, Hannity doesn't want the truth, either! IMHO!

[Pelham]

"Also, the sheer number of people that have come forward with knowledge of his predilections

Good grief, it's an organized political hit right before the election- the very same tactic was attempted against Trump, with Gloria Allred involved in both cases.

It shouldn't require a written admission by the conspirators for freepers to spot this for what it is. The only real question is whether it's sponsored by Mitch McConnell or the Democrats.

[Yaelle]

How did you know I’m secretly Sean Hannity?!? Dang my cover is blown. I resign to not let my heart be troubled.

[kelly4c]

I know, right? I like Hannity. I find him earnest, a real conservative and trustworthy.