Click The Pic
Posted on 07/21/2017 7:55:44 PM PDT by NetAddicted
Can't copy. Sorry.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
No idea why autocorrect changed TrumpAndOJ.com to trumpsdoncom.
O.J. would easily get 85% of the black vote if he ran for President and would probably win the popular vote.
Can you change Trump to “the Trump organization” in the title?
O.J. is going to be the next ambassador to North Korea. :-P
OJ would be able to slash the budget
“O.J. is going to be the next ambassador to North Korea.”
I was hoping he would finally be able to resume his search for the real killers of his wife and her boyfriend.
/s
Dennis Rodman will be heartbroken.
Multitasking, baby. Multitasking.
OJ’s email address:
Slash-Slash-Backslash-Escape.
Well, even if you can't copy it - you could still, at least, summarize the article and/or provide your own stance on the issue. That way, we'd have at least some idea what this is about before wasting our time / endangering our computers by clicking on your link.
Regards,
Purchased in 2007, it’s one of 3500 domains the Trump Organization bought to prevent someone else from buying them and using them to tarnish the Trump name. Part of corporate image management.
I’ll keep that in mind, but I thought the title told what it was about.
No, titles rarely provide enough extensive, unbiased information so as to enable the casual reader to immediately ascertain a) what the article is really about; b) whether the article is extremely biased or not; c) whether the article etc.
Some people also encounter technical difficulties (pop-up ads) or have other constraints (can't access the site from their [work] location).
That's why so-called "netiquette" recommends briefly summarizing the contents and quality of the linked article. In doing so, the FReeper should also add his own qualifiers, like: "Barf alert! This is bull-hockey!" or "This article is very anti-Trump, but otherwise contains some interesting arguments," or "This is a very lengthy article containing a great deal of technical jargon and is thus suitable only for computer-freaks."
I, for one, have no idea why an article about an Internet address referencing "OJ" ("orange juice?") should be at all of interest.
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.