Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(vanity) Did I just hear on the news, the guy taken off the UA flight, was to keep a UA employee on?
(television) ^ | 4/11/2017

Posted on 04/11/2017 12:09:34 AM PDT by cba123

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-179 next last
To: Darksheare

“Not just one United employee, but four.”

Correct; they were being repositioned for another flight the following morning. UA Had several other options, hope it gets its pants sued off.


61 posted on 04/11/2017 2:53:19 AM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Yes, Fox reported yesterday that an employee was needed at another airport so United chose to bump a passenger. What I didn’t realize is that a domestic passenger could get up to $1350.00 an overseas passenger could get up to $5000.00 if they are bumped. United offered this guy $800.00.


62 posted on 04/11/2017 2:53:43 AM PDT by duckman ( Not tired of winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Contingencies. In every business, especially a large corporate with common issues, like mechanical breakdowns, bad weather, etc., one must have plans. You plan your endeavors and then work your plan. Customer service was once a pillar of business. It is no longer. If you think this particular “issue” suddenly reared its head and management was caught flatfooted, I have a beach property to sell you.


63 posted on 04/11/2017 2:54:07 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Trump-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

There is no way he gets that much. And his beef would be with the cops, not the airline.

He gets $150k, tops.


64 posted on 04/11/2017 2:57:39 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Brace. Brace. Brace. Heads down. Do not look up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

They do have contingency plans.

Every major airline has extra crews on call at their major hubs, ready to send whenever an additional fresh crew is needed.

Kentucky isn’t a major hub. They don’t have a spare set of crew there. Chicago is a major hub. They had to send the crew from Chicago to Kentucky cause something happened. That’s the contingency plan.


65 posted on 04/11/2017 2:59:05 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
The number of reserve crew (and planes) was dramatically reduced in the cost cutting that occurred post 9/11... root cause of the drop in on time performance and this kind of stuff.

Software was implemented that sought to optimize both the man power needs as well as planes (sorry, I was big part of that effort as well.) I'm guessing the margins got shaved a lot more later.
66 posted on 04/11/2017 2:59:53 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I guarantee you he will get zero if he tries to sue united, they did nothing wrong by the law that I’ve seen and the law and contract of carriage backs them up.

I don’t know about the police situation


67 posted on 04/11/2017 3:00:56 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

They will settle just to keep it from stretching out media attention. We’ll never here of what amount or even if there is a settlement, but I can promise you there will be one.


68 posted on 04/11/2017 3:03:33 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

The passenger was 69 years old, and his wife was with him. The 69 year old passenger/doctor somehow re-boarded the plane, bloodied and very confused. That was horrible decision by United. They had plenty of time to sort out the overbooking BEFORE they boarded the flight. At worst, they could have offered twice what they were offering, PLUS hotel. I hope he sues and wins.


69 posted on 04/11/2017 3:07:10 AM PDT by blackbetty59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm

There isn’t even the tiniest fig leaf of a claim in court against united.

There is NO chance of a settlement or an award.

If United wants to give extra bump compensation for public relations reasons, that’s different.

Maybe there is a claim against the police, but not United.


70 posted on 04/11/2017 3:07:52 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: blackbetty59
That was a horrible decision by United beat down by Chicago Aviation police.

Fixed.

71 posted on 04/11/2017 3:14:05 AM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Yes. All 4 seats were for united employees


72 posted on 04/11/2017 3:17:22 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat
That's odd. I think I've seen several threads on it,

Better check the batteries in your sarcasm detector!

73 posted on 04/11/2017 3:19:26 AM PDT by Moltke (Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

United shows off its new flight attendant uniforms

"Seatbacks and trays to their upright position *NOW*!"

74 posted on 04/11/2017 3:19:51 AM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm
What I find appalling is that it was a flight from Chicago to Louisville. That's 298 miles. They could've put four people in a rental car

File in the file "nobody is in charge of common sense anymore".

75 posted on 04/11/2017 3:24:15 AM PDT by grania (only a pawn in their game)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cba123

In ‘75 -’76, I and a friend worked behind the scenes at a local doughnut shop franchise and our motto was “F*ck the customers, we work here.” We were Juniors in high school. Now almost 40 years later, it looks like it’s caught on...big time!


76 posted on 04/11/2017 3:24:18 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Correct. 4 UA employees (probably pilots that were scheduled to fly out of this flights destination) were the reason 4 paying customers had to be taken off the plane. No one volunteered to give up their seats so they had to select 4 themselves. I am assuming that 3 others went peacefully. But this guy refused.


77 posted on 04/11/2017 3:27:40 AM PDT by al_c (Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

On the upside, United will now have plenty of seats for their employees! They won’t have to worry about dragging those pesky ticket-paying elderly passengers off screaming and bloodied.


78 posted on 04/11/2017 3:28:44 AM PDT by blackbetty59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cba123

It was reported to be a UA flight crew that bumped the paying passengers. I suppose this is how the airline gets flight crews from where they are to where they need to be in order to maintain scheduled flights — ie. ‘dead-heading’.

The problem was the overbooking and how it was handled.


79 posted on 04/11/2017 3:34:00 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

If this sometimes happens on planes due to a weight lowering need, why couldn’t they take a few bags off? Easier to deal with irrate owner later on, and out of public view.


80 posted on 04/11/2017 3:34:53 AM PDT by 4Liberty (PRESIDENT TRUMP: Making Private Property Rights great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson