Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The PT-76 Was the Little Soviet Amphibious Tank That Could
War is Boring ^ | March 17, 2017 | Sebastien Roblin

Posted on 03/17/2017 6:09:57 AM PDT by C19fan

The PT-76 seems like a minor oddity of the Cold War — a Soviet amphibious light tank with thin armor and an unimpressive gun. Certainly it seemed bound for rough treatment on modern battlefields full of heavy weapons and heavier tanks. But the floating PT-76 chalked up a remarkable record, carrying knife-wielding Himalayan soldiers into battle, sinking gunboats on the Ganges Delta, dueling powerful U.S. Patton tanks in Vietnam, and launching amphibious surprise attacks on both sides of the same Middle Eastern war.

(Excerpt) Read more at warisboring.com ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: armor; soviet

1 posted on 03/17/2017 6:09:58 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“That blew up real good.”


2 posted on 03/17/2017 6:29:01 AM PDT by OKSooner (It's always loaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It took some guts to ride that thing through the waves.


3 posted on 03/17/2017 6:54:26 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

It probably took even more guts to ride a Sherman with the canvas sides through the waves. When I see pictures of those I think life was cheap.


4 posted on 03/17/2017 7:11:20 AM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

I can’t imagine being in that death trap version of the Sherman tank going into the drink.


5 posted on 03/17/2017 7:16:19 AM PDT by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

One of the videos with the original story shows a snorkel tank going through a river.

Yikes.


6 posted on 03/17/2017 7:18:39 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Oh, sorry. I thought this was a McHale’s Navy thread.


7 posted on 03/17/2017 7:34:56 AM PDT by MGG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Bear in mind that we had the Sheridan - lightly armored (but with a big gun). If you were in one of those things you had almost no protection except for not being seen.


8 posted on 03/17/2017 7:43:54 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Yep.

The Sheridan was an Armored Airborne Reconnaissance Vehicle (AARV).

The trouble was, the Airborne folks wanted to use it as a tank.


9 posted on 03/17/2017 7:59:30 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Barely armored, floating bump.


10 posted on 03/17/2017 9:35:48 AM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

The PT-76 was flimsy. M-72 LAW opened it up like a tin can. In 1972 NVA didn’t do any better with real tanks like T-54s or T-55s. Their military genius Vo Nguyen Giap sent them against us with no infantry support. Grunts with LAWs made lots of their tanks dead, too.


11 posted on 03/17/2017 9:39:11 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Indeed it was flimsy. But that was the price of making it amphibious. Against troops armed with light machine guns and rifles only it could be very dangerous. But give the troops a .50 cal or almost any heavier weapon and the PT-76 could be in deep trouble.


12 posted on 03/17/2017 10:31:50 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

I recall now pix of a PT-76 that Ma Deuce turned into a collander. It was half submerged after several .50 hits made it go glub-glub-glub-glub.


13 posted on 03/17/2017 10:49:33 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

The so-called Easter offensive.
http://vnafmamn.com/Valiant_Anloc.html
“By April 7 the NVA had reached An Loc, a town about 50 miles northwest of Saigon. There, the South Vietnamese government forces and their American advisors were made their stand.”
I’m proud to say that my father was one of the advisors. He said his ARVN counterparts were skeptical but agreed to have their men lay low. As the tanks passed they disabled them with LAW. Yeah, they cleaned house that day. He said they fought well.
Another thing, he said the M-16 was a “fine weapon as long as you cleaned it.” By early `72 they had the ammo and cleaning kits problem addressed.

God bless our Vietnam vets. May the sun shine warm upon your face, and rains fall soft upon your fields. And until we meet again, May God hold you in the palm of His hand.


14 posted on 03/17/2017 12:11:41 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

I thank your father for his service and hope he is still with us. My helicopter battalion flew in the relief of An Loc & we saw lots of killed enemy vehicles along QL 19 outside the town. Volleyed LAWs could separate a T-54 turret from the hull. There were knocked out BTR-50s as well.

There were also shot down Medevac Hueys that had been painted white with red crosses. No rules of war for the NVA.

The ARVNs at An Loc outlasted the French at Dien Bien Phu and impressed us with their tenacity.

Read “Trial By Fire” by Dale Andrade, 1995, for a comprehensive account of the Easter Offensive and our last full year in RVN.


15 posted on 03/18/2017 7:24:35 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
If you were in one of those things you had almost no protection except for not being seen.

Which didn't help a lot, since one could be heard moving for about 3 miles.

16 posted on 03/19/2017 9:47:15 AM PDT by archy (Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, and eat you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Back when the Littlefield collection was auctioned off, a PT-76b from the batch reportedly sold for $172,500, probably more than its original cost to the Soviet Naval Infantry, who were the main user of the things.

I don't know for sure, but Littlefield's may have come from Indiana collector Fred Ropkey, who passed away around 2014, having operated the Indina Museum of Armor at Crawfordsville since his relocation from Indy.


17 posted on 03/19/2017 10:09:41 AM PDT by archy (Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, and eat you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson