>
I’m in favor of it in order to prevent further detachment from key historical documents. We’re already pretty far removed from the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Imagine how much mischief could be made if no one was capable of going back to the original source document to read what it actually says? Same with old family documents and letters, all cursive. Further detachment from these things will lead to nothing good.
>
FURTHER detachment? F* cursive and bring back Civics and Debate.
Watch any man-on-the-street, or the corruption of the language (Berkley\media), any ‘student protest’, or...These dip-shits are already detached.
The are EXACTLY what the Socialists wanted and started 100yrs+ ago: obedient robots w/ no thought of their own. Not as if the (R) ‘opposition’ party did jack about it either...
You act as if civics and debate in this country are completely divorced from the means by which our formative documents were recorded.
They’re not, in my opinion. Language has a profound influence upon thought patterns, this much has been proven. A strong case can be made for the method of creating tangible record of those thoughts. All that’s good about our country and its founding was recorded how?
Cursive.