Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mattis unhappy over travel ban, drafting list of names of military interpreters to be admitted
Hotair ^ | 01/30/2017 | AllahPundit

Posted on 01/30/2017 10:54:10 PM PST by SeekAndFind

As a point of law, Mattis has no authority himself under Trump’s order to grant visas. That falls to DHS and the State Department under section 3(g), although it would be … weird if any of the Pentagon’s recommendations for exemptions from the travel ban were to be turned down.

Mattis reportedly wasn’t consulted while the order was being drafted, which may help explain his (alleged) annoyance at it. Two thumbs up for the crack Trump political team in cutting the single most respected member of their natsec team out of the policymaking process. I wonder how many more Bannon-style power plays like that it’ll take before Mattis decides he has better things to do with the rest of his life than serve as a front man for actions on which he has no input.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, blindsided by President Trump’s travel ban that includes U.S. allies in Iraq, is submitting to the White House a list of Iraqis who have helped the U.S. military so they can be considered for exemptions to the temporary immigration freeze affecting seven majority-Muslim countries.

Some officials say Mattis was stung by the blistering criticism leveled by former military commanders and lawmakers who said the blanket ban risked the lives of Iraqi interpreters and others who have supported the U.S. military at great personal risk…

One official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Mattis was displeased with how the ban was implemented, and with the lack of consultation with the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security.

If it cheers him up any, the first snap poll after the order was issued shows majority support for the key principles in the order:

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 57% of Likely U.S. Voters favor a temporary ban on refugees from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen until the federal government approves its ability to screen out potential terrorists from coming here. Thirty-three percent (33%) are opposed, while 10% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Similarly, 56% favor a temporary block on visas prohibiting residents of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the United States until the government approves its ability to screen for likely terrorists. Thirty-two percent (32%) oppose this temporary ban, and 11% are undecided.

If not for the initial cock-up barring green-card holders, which has now been remedied by an order from John Kelly, the left would have had less ammo to try to turn this into a galvanizing outrage. I think the temporary ban on refugees is unfortunate since they’re already closely screened and the U.S. accepts far, far fewer than Europe does, but the numbers don’t lie. The public is okay with excluding them, at least temporarily, on the principle of “better safe than sorry.” It’ll be an interesting test of strength between Trump and the media, which are in saturation mode trying to turn the public against Trump’s action (replete with disinformation about it being a “Muslim ban,” etc), to see if the polling starts to turn negative on his order in the coming days.

Here’s Seth Moulton, an Iraq veteran turned Democratic congressman who knows Mattis, who claims that there’s “no way in hell” he would support the order.

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister
KEYWORDS: bordersecurity; first100days; mattis; propaganda; secdefmattis; tds; travelban; trumpdod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: TomasUSMC

when Trump signed the order, Mattis was standing right behind him smiling away...even put the pen in his pocket.


21 posted on 01/30/2017 11:37:52 PM PST by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Man, he’s really got the sneering thing going on, doesn’t he?

It must be hard to feel so...powerless, futile.


22 posted on 01/30/2017 11:38:13 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: basalt

when Trump signed the order, Mattis was standing right behind him smiling away...even put the pen in his pocket.

YEP. PROBABLY WROTE THE DAMN THING.

BEST THING Trump could do now is start his own Government News Channel.....oh wouldn’t that freak the media the hell out of their stinking minds. Hell just take over PBS. Change it to TBS.


23 posted on 01/30/2017 11:59:19 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

and then I have to spend a fortune on those darn nieces and nephews :)


24 posted on 01/31/2017 12:04:15 AM PST by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

AllahPundit is generally a buffoon. This is actually an example of how it is working well and the right people will be accounted for and not hung out to dry.


25 posted on 01/31/2017 12:12:07 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Stop posting lies from allah idiot and that trump hate site hot gas from Salem media a Trump hater media scam forccheapmlabor espress.

it’s fake news from a trump hate media website.

you lost poster.
your hate of trump is well documented here.

stop posting lies from a trump haters.


26 posted on 01/31/2017 12:19:31 AM PST by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Donald should have post-dated the order by 24 or 48 hours. No upside to inconveniencing possibly innocent travelers.

That would have avoided all those in-airport sob stories, wherein the ACLU comes to the rescue winning a restraining order from a federal judge, and the MSM goes wild with human interest features about the poor moon-god worshiping victims.

As for Secretary Mattis, the order should have included a Pentagon contact to verify exceptions ...

27 posted on 01/31/2017 12:24:32 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is why I called quits on Hot Air. Allahpundit is just unbearable. There are better sites out there.


28 posted on 01/31/2017 12:27:13 AM PST by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: basalt
when Trump signed the order, Mattis was standing right behind him smiling away...even put the pen in his pocket.

THUMBS UP! WELL SPOTTED!

29 posted on 01/31/2017 12:29:23 AM PST by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

FR really needs to ban all of the Salem witch media websites, including townhall.com, redstate.com, human events, etc


30 posted on 01/31/2017 12:58:24 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Some officials say Mattis was stung by the blistering criticism leveled by former military commanders and lawmakers who said the blanket ban risked the lives of Iraqi interpreters and others who have supported the U.S. military at great personal risk…

First of all, "some officials" is meaningless.

Whose defense secretary is Jim Mattis? Obama's? Trump's? a temporary holder of the post? What?
Why is so much reported with such incompetent ambiguities?

I assume Mattis is also aware how many of these koranimals (linked to below) were koranimals who lied to become residents, some even citizens before returning to their koranimal ways?

The military might as well have the killers vet themselves! The military seem to have no more competence that Obama's flying monkeys "vetting" terrorists.

What gives?

20 “vetted” Muslim refugees who turned to jihad :

LINK 1

LINK 2

31 posted on 01/31/2017 12:58:27 AM PST by publius911 (I SUPPORT MY PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I can see Mattis being upset. He also, you notice, has kept it under wraps (if he IS angry).

Mattis knows how to work within an organization. He’ll deliver a message to the boss and this boss will listen.

Hot Air can shove it.


32 posted on 01/31/2017 3:06:49 AM PST by SoFloFreeper (Isaiah 25:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

“They need to set the record straight on this. We do not need to know how anyone in this administration “feels” about the President’s decisions. It is not “about Mattis”. He was selected to do a job not make news for himself.”

I absolutely agree. If true, this is disconcerting, especially in context with Mattis’ views on Israel. I know I am in a minority here, but I don’t trust Mattis at all, and I certainly do not agree with his views that Israel defending herself is a problem.


33 posted on 01/31/2017 3:18:22 AM PST by UGA2014
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
All the pundits and those who comment need to be aware of the fact that THEY DON'T HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION that the Nat Security Team does. There is likely intel out there informing this decision, and for those not in the know to spend so much energy second guessing is not only laughable but ignorant. As another poster pointed out yesterday, there was just a big raid in Yemen, which likely yielded some information regarding threats to the US and its allies. Perhaps this had something to do with the decision, perhaps not. The point is, those without the clearance just don't know and shouldn't be throwing stones like they did.
34 posted on 01/31/2017 3:21:29 AM PST by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The Jester is a big disappointment as well. I thought he was ‘conservative’, but bashes President Trump constantly.


35 posted on 01/31/2017 3:28:17 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (****happy dance**** BIGLY!!!! Shadilay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Allahpundit, the nevertrumping a-hole, has resorted to featuring and quoting the NY Times on Trump. Might as well use the Huffington Post or Media Matters.

Maybe there is a clue in his name.

Hm.

I wonder what it could be?

36 posted on 01/31/2017 3:29:59 AM PST by Lazamataz (I hereby coin a new Internet acronym: NTOWY -- Not Tired Of Winning Yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: publius911

Bfl


37 posted on 01/31/2017 3:41:01 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Yep....you said it!


38 posted on 01/31/2017 3:43:54 AM PST by Guenevere (If my people......will humble themselves and pray and seek my face .....I will heal their land...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So where were these interpreters two weeks ago? Why didn’t the Obama administration allow them in?


39 posted on 01/31/2017 3:50:58 AM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
from Allahpuntit's source, the NYT:

"James Jay Carafano, a vice president of the conservative Heritage Foundation and a member of Mr. Trump’s transition team, said that little of that work was shared with career officials at the Homeland Security Department, the State Department or other" agencies.

"There was 'a firewall between the old administration and the incoming one,' Mr. Carafano said."

"One reason, he said, is that when the Trump transition team asked pointed questions suggesting new policies to the career officials, those questions were swiftly leaked to the news media, generating negative stories. So the Trump team began to limit the information they discussed with officials from the previous administration."

“Why share it with them?” Mr. Carafano said.

40 posted on 01/31/2017 3:52:45 AM PST by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson