Original German hyperlinked post for video content:
Google translation of original German hyperlinked post for video content: here
*****
hat tip: VladTepesblog and InfidelBloggersAlliance
*****===>The following is a google translation of page listing source material for this video:
ANGELA MERKEL
Merkel's right? We cover up!
Facts rather than post-tactical to the migration policy, which have it in itself
With this video we want to break through the Berlin Schweigekartell and make available to as many people in our country as possible the sources of the points mentioned in the video.
Merkel: CDU party of the rule of law
(Minute 0:52)
ARD, "The Unexpected", broadcast in the first on 12 December 2016
The following link only worked until January 11, 2017:
Sources to the O-tone Merkel in connection with Party-Party-affiliates
(Minute 1:25) Journalist Alan Posener (The World): Merkel represents morality before right
The journalist from the daily Die Welt, Alan Posener, said in "Hart but fair" in the ARD on 5 December 2016:
"When we saw the scenes in Budapest's main station, the Chancellor acted, if you wanted to put morality before law !"
(Minute 2:07) Jan Fleischhauer, in the Der Spiegel: "Security gap Chancellor" from 1 August 2016
In the article you will find the statement in the video under the following link:
(Minute 3:12) FAZ: " A secret clearance to open the border?" Of 21 January 2016
Here is the link to the article with the statements about massive political pressure on members of the coalition parliamentary parties:
Beck's online commentary Ausländerrecht, Kluth / Heusch 11. Edition Date: 15.08.2016 Rn. 35-3 6
(Minute 3:55)
First of all, this is about § 18 Asylum Act as the legal basis for the crossing of borders:
The wording of § 18 Asylum Act:
§ 18 Asylum Act: Tasks of the border authority
(2) The foreigner is to be refused entry if:
1. he shall enter from a safe third country (Article 26a)
2. there is evidence that another country is responsible for the implementation of the asylum procedure by means of European Community legislation or international treaties, and that a recovery or resumption procedure is initiated, or
3. it constitutes a danger to the general public because, in the Federal Republic of Germany, it has been convicted of a particularly serious offense to a term of imprisonment of at least three years and its departure no longer than three years.
(4) In the case of entry from a safe third country (section 26a) , the refusal or refusal of entry shall be forbidden if:
(1) the Federal Republic of Germany is responsible for the implementation of an asylum procedure on the basis of European Community legislation or an international treaty with the safe third country;
2. the Federal Ministry of the Interior has ordered it for international or humanitarian reasons or for the protection of political interests of the Federal Republic of Germany.
According to various reports, however, such an arrangement by the Federal Ministry of the Interior is not available to the public. In the above-mentioned FAZ article "A Secret Decree Opening the Frontier?" It refers to the above mentioned § 18 Paragraph 4 No. 2 Asylum Act:
"Without such an arrangement (note: the Federal Ministry of the Interior), the unimpeded entry of the many (Syrian) refugees would obviously be illegal."
According to Beck's online commentary (see above, paragraph 35-3)
"Like No. 1, No. 2 is also tailored to individual cases".
§ 18, Paragraph 4, No. 2, therefore, is not designed for a "general and uncontrolled " entry (De Fabhewuer / Grabenwarter / Murswiek, The State in the Refugee Crisis, 2016, 135, Di Fabio, Migration Crisis as a Federal Constitutional Problem, 94).
Thus, even if such an arrangement existed, the legality of the border opening would not necessarily be established.
According to Beck's online commentary (see above, margins 35-3 6)
"Whether the BMI (Note: Federal Ministry of the Interior) adopted such an arrangement at the end of August / beginning of September 2015 is, however, still in the dark, and the scientific services of the Bundestag are also puzzling".
This is confirmed by our contacts in the German Bundestag. Even the scientific services of the German Bundestag are still puzzling about our sources. To date, such a derogation has not been disclosed.
Conclusion makes you stunned
1. Even if there were such a derogation from the Federal Ministry of the Interior, a breach of the law by the Merkel government would not be ruled out, since a "general and uncontrolled entry" would not be covered by Article 18 (4) (2) of the Asylum Act.
2. It is especially disillusioning, however, that, on the basis of the reports shown here, fog candles are still ignited and even the existence of a corresponding order of the federal government has not been made public.
Why the migration wave returns after the Bundestag election
(Minute 5:25)
Most Syrians currently receive only subsidiary protection. According to the statement by the Federal Office for Migration under the following link, subsidiary protection,
"If neither refugee protection nor the right to asylum can be granted and there is serious danger in the country of origin ":
Here n-tv reports that many Syrians complain against receiving only this "subsidiary protection" in Germany. And in more than 90 per cent of cases, our courts grant them the higher level of protection afforded by the Geneva Convention:
Bitter consequence: This gives you the right to privileged family reunion. The advantage is that the applicant does not have to provide proof of adequate living and housing.
The Asylum Act II, implemented as of 17 March 2016, has ensured that persons who are classified as eligible for subsidiary protection are not entitled to the privileged family reunion until 16 March 2018, ie in a transitional period of two years.
It is clear that from March 16, 2018, about half a year after the Bundestag election, a drastic increase in family immigration will occur if the legislator does not intervene. All this is postponed to the post-Bundestag elections.
Statistical tricks that need to be talked about
(Minute 5:45)
We strongly recommend reading the article on "Family Reunion" published in "Tichy's Insight" (long-standing and esteemed chief editor of Wochenmagazin "Die Wirtschaftswoche").
In the article, with reference to a request to the Federal Foreign Office in October 2016:
"The BAMF has already issued an assessment of the height of the family estate. The Federal Foreign Office does not collect any statistical information on family immigration to recognized refugees / asylum-seekers. After the visa application has been completed and the applicant has been admitted to Germany, the immigration permit is issued by the responsible foreigners' authority. An application for asylum is therefore not required. The family suffrage thus does not constitute a refugee move . "
Apparently no one in the German government and administration is interested in the exact extent of the family immigration. So only someone who wants to obfuscate.
Help on site would be much more effective
(Minute 6:20)
Please do not ask us, with our criticism of Merkel's migration policy, let us speak ruthlessness and human hostility.
No, we just say that on-site help would be much more effective.
According to a report of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung of March 11, 2016 (page 18), Federal Development Minister Gerd Müller (CSU) spoke with the title
"Quick Syria help
Minister Müller: The money is thirty times more effective on the ground "
From the fact that aid on the ground is much more effective. We note that on-the-spot help would not have uprooted people from their culture. Many people here in Europe are clamoring for a culture that has nothing in common with it.
Merkel looked away when the refugee aid had to be massively selected on the spot
(Minute 6:49)
Our government has been looking at how the United Nations World Food Program has had to cut back massively on support for the refugees in Jordan, Syria and Turkey. This has reinforced the escape motif to Europe.
Read for yourself how the United Nations reported on drastic cuts in Syrian refugees in Lebanon as part of its World Food Program and on 1 July 2015:
It is also interesting how Elmar Brok, the "great" CDU European politician in Brussels, made the comment in the video addressed in the video on 17 September 2015:
"The curse began two-and-a-half months ago from the Middle East, because the food supply was reduced by 40 percent and because no money was available, which is a scandal that Europe, America, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have bolstered And here no more money is given to the refugees. "
In this way, the escape motifs of the people were reinforced. A rogue, who thinks evil?
Merkel also looked away as "our allies" first made the civil war in Syria possible
(Minute 8:31) FAZ: "A Qantum Diplomacy" of 2 October 2015 (Page 2)
In the film we address a report of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, which appeared on page 2 on October 2, 2015.
It states:
" How many Syrians the CIA has trained in Jordanian training camps is unclear. "
According to "New York Times" it is 3000 to 5000 and according to "Washington Post 10,000 fighters. As a result, the CIA is expected to provide almost $ 1 billion a year for the program.
These reports on the training of warriors for the civil war in Syria by the CIA in Jordan has also been published online at the following link of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung:
In our knowledge box "What you should know about refugee policy ..."
You will find what we wrote to our readers on September 12, 2015, one week after the opening of the border.
"I (Note: Thorsten Schulte) talked to Marc Faber, who spoke to me at the Gold Congress almost a year ago in Stuttgart, after the event in the evening about Qatar and much else.In June 2013 he wrote about the region in his publication, Where I spoke to him, then visited the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and asked a host from the country: "Can you explain something to me? How is it that the small Qatar, with a population of just 250,000 people, intervenes in the affairs of every country in the Middle East, including support for the uprising against Muammar al-Gaddafi in Libya? " The spontaneous answer was " We could take over Qatar at any time. "Marc Faber said, " I can hardly believe that such a small, insignificant state can interfere with the internal affairs of so many countries in Africa and the Middle East. (Including Hamas, the Muslim Federation and the Jihadists in the Qatar region). I am sure Qatar is acting on behalf of another, powerful. " Later, he said clearly, " I told Ali I thought the US would not hesitate to use Qatar for the dirty work in the region and the Middle East In the same way, destabilize China as it does with North Korea in Asia. " This is what Dr. Marc Faber said, but I do not always agree with him, but I do appreciate his analyzes, and I agree with them I am not thinking that Qatar is against the interests of the US On the contrary, it should be clear to every semi-expert observer that the country has a substantial share of the chaos in Syria and Libya.
If you do not believe this, please read the statements of Dr. Guido Steinberg. This man, who was a terrorist in the Federal Chancellery from 2002 to 2005, clearly says in an interview for Arte:
"Qatar wants to play a clear leadership role".
Steinberg wrote in May 2012 (!) About the small emirate with 250,000 citizens that it is based on close security policy relations with the USA:
"Their central element is the air base in the Qatar Al-Udaid, which has existed since 2003 and became the most important US base in the Middle East."
He talks about Qatar's influence in:
"Libya, where Doha, with the United States, the United Kingdom and France, equipped the rebels with weapons, and the Qatari military trained Libyan fighters."
Then he says that all this can be read in peace under the link given, from the reorientation of Syria's policy and from the goal of Qatar,
"To work more aggressively against Saudi allies and to support the opposition in Syria".
Already in May 2012 he writes things like:
"If Qatar remains faithful to its existing line, it will favor the strong Muslim brothers and the Salafist groups operating in the opposition."
He speaks of the "danger of ethnic-confessional conflicts between insurgents on the one hand and the Alewites, Christians and Kurds on the other." And he is one thing:
" If you are working with Qatar today, you need to be aware that it is purposeful to promote organizations and people who are not democrats."
All this he wrote broadly on May 1, 2012:
Trump says in a television interview, which was recently a conspiracy theory
(Minute 9:17)
Here you can see the excerpt from Trumps TV interview on 10 February 2016 on CBS:
Here is the text:
TV hostess interrupts Trump:
"But you know what Russia is doing in Syria: Russia is attacking the (rebel) groups we support (USA)."
Trump:
"Sure, why do we support these (rebel) groups? I do not even know who these people are. I talk to US generals and they keep telling me, 'We give billions of US dollars of equipment and financial aid to people we do not know. These groups are probably worse than Assad. ' Assad is not a baby, is not an innocent, is not a good man, but who are these people and groups that we support? And again, Libya ... "
TV host interrupts Trump:
"This is President Obama's argument."
Trump:
"Yes, I know, but why does he do that? Why is he giving them so much equipment and weapons? We (US) support people who want to overthrow Assad. Russia and Iran, both together are a supermarket - we have made them to the supermarket - they support Assad. We must get rid of the IS, we must get rid of the people who cut off the heads of people. "
We very much hope that the many information with the corresponding links will open many eyes.
Please make your friends, acquaintances and relatives aware of the issues raised. The more people in our country know about these backgrounds, the better.
