Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There is something really wrong with the Detroit/Wayne county vote totals
Wayne County Clerk ^ | 12/5/16 | Me

Posted on 12/05/2016 6:04:55 PM PST by sharkhawk

There are some really strange things going on in Detroit with the vote. First the Detroit Free Press wrote an article saying that over 59% of Detroit precincts couldn't be recounted due to mismatched votes. Then the claims that there are 85,000 uncounted votes in Detroit. So I did a little digging.

First the Wayne County Clerk lists 1.134 million ballots cast, but if you add the total presidential votes there are 1.252 million total. Second, Detroit is listed as having a 97% voter turnout, but is short the 85,000 votes vs ballots cast. This matches votes cast for other citywide races. Then outside of detroits has about 180,000 more votes cast than ballots listed. Obviously there is very wrong with their numbers, and with the detroit Free Press article from this morning, it probably shows some type of fraud.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2016recount; detroit; election; fraud; mi2016; michigan; pearlclutcher; urban; votingmachines; waynecounty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
First, if their is someone who can get this to the right people in Michigan, and also to check my numbers. Here is the Detroit Free Press article from today.

Mismatched numbers means precincts can't be recounted

And here is the Wayne County Clerk site. Wayne County Clerk

1 posted on 12/05/2016 6:04:55 PM PST by sharkhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk
"97% voter turnout"

Don't walk past the cemeteries on voting day, you'll be trampled.

2 posted on 12/05/2016 6:09:28 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

If I recall, the 85,000 votes were Non-Votes for President. Votes were cast for down ballot candidates, but none for President. I think the last election there were 45 K Non-votes for President or something close to that.


3 posted on 12/05/2016 6:09:47 PM PST by bobsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk
The Left wants Sonia Sotomayor to decide the election.

Ballots, shmallots.

4 posted on 12/05/2016 6:09:58 PM PST by cmj328 (We live here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

In RAT-dominated precincts, it is not unusual to have more votes cast than the total number of registered voters, and even the number of registered voters is suspect. The whole system is corrupt. How else would RATS ever win?


5 posted on 12/05/2016 6:10:24 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

What’s there to know? Cheating is done by the Democrats. Trump is the man to do something about it. Didn’t stop them.


6 posted on 12/05/2016 6:11:04 PM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

97%. Why....its almost like they Vote for a Living in Detroit. Even the Dead apparently vote for a living.


7 posted on 12/05/2016 6:11:09 PM PST by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

That’s what I heard too, but some Dims are claiming that was the total for Detroit alone. Looking at the “official” results, the accusation is crap.


8 posted on 12/05/2016 6:12:45 PM PST by sharkhawk (GO CUBS GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

Chebk out Milwaukee recounts vs original counts.
Hillary’s numbers are way down since the recount


9 posted on 12/05/2016 6:13:01 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (Where's Hillary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

http://elections.wi.gov/sites/default/files/publication/265/2016_general_election_recount_12_05_16_xlsx_10403.xlsx


10 posted on 12/05/2016 6:13:13 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (Where's Hillary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

The drop in Milwaukee is due to absentee’s being counted centrally. Not too worried about that yet.


11 posted on 12/05/2016 6:13:53 PM PST by sharkhawk (GO CUBS GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“97% voter turnout”

As bad at the Soviet Union was, at least their people always got out to vote - 100%. Sounds like Detroit is almost there.


12 posted on 12/05/2016 6:15:14 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

Nothing like a wide Latrina wading into the swamp. Makes it tougher to drain the place.


13 posted on 12/05/2016 6:15:22 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

Looks kind of strange, but sometimes data seems strange to those of us who do not understand every aspect of the process.


14 posted on 12/05/2016 6:20:18 PM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

How nice. If you want to commit fraud, go ahead, and then spoil the ballots by reporting a wrong number and no one will ever recount them.


15 posted on 12/05/2016 6:20:59 PM PST by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is..." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

There is ALWAYS funny business whenever it comes to blue states and the deep blue “pockets” that always keep them that way.


16 posted on 12/05/2016 6:21:07 PM PST by Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

Do you have the correct figures?

http://www.waynecounty.com/documents/exec/clerk/16gsumrp.pdf#toolbar=1&view=FitH


17 posted on 12/05/2016 6:22:10 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Typical of the MSM, isn’t it? How “85,000 people not voting” for president can turn into “85,000 uncounted votes.” But recounters in Michigan have been instructed that no mark in the target area = no vote.


18 posted on 12/05/2016 6:23:08 PM PST by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

Was gonna send a link to this to your earlier post...

Have to assume it’s the result of cheating.
Shocking that the Republican government isn’t doing anything about it.
Of course the national media won’t publicize it since it doesn’t fit their narrative.

In another heavily Democrat Mich County:
“Chad Livengood ;@ChadLivengood · 3h3 hours ago

#MichiganRecount update from Ingham County since recount started around 12:30PM: 24 precincts recounted, six were not recountable.”

“six were not recountable...”


19 posted on 12/05/2016 6:23:46 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk
Detroit is not 97% turnout, it's 48.6. It's a two page ballot. You are counting total pages scanned as total ballots. Fewer voters used page 2 of ballot, so it's count is lower than total ballots.

You may want to relook the rest of your numbers using ballots and not pages.

20 posted on 12/05/2016 6:26:40 PM PST by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson