Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump's Objection to MI Recount (Jill Stein Didn't Notarize Her Request LOL)
Obection Petition ^ | 12/1/2016 | Trump Lawyers

Posted on 12/01/2016 12:23:54 PM PST by struggle

Reading through it now...pretty good case and looks to be easily rejected.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: election; stein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Raycpa
I doubt the notary signature is material.

I can't speak to Michigan law but at least in NY, in the election law context, improper Notarization is often a fatal defect.

41 posted on 12/01/2016 12:56:08 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Either she is an absolute airhead or she did it on purpose.


42 posted on 12/01/2016 12:57:05 PM PST by hsmomx3 (Love my Steelers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

NTOW.

Not Tired Of Winning.

.


43 posted on 12/01/2016 12:58:02 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: struggle

From the filing:
“On what basis does Stein seek to disenfranchise Michigan citizens? None really, save for speculation. All available evidence suggests that the 2016 general election was not tainted by fraud or mistake. Governor Snyder has said so. See Governor Rick Snyder on Twitter, TwiTTER ~ (Nov. 28, 2016) archived at https://perma.cc/Q5X3-ACZV. So too has the White House. See ~ Geller, White House insists hackers didn’t sway election, even as recount begins, POLITICO. Nov. 26, 2016), archived at https://perma.cc/5Z5C-Z59S.
Even the chief counsel to second-place finisher Hillary Clinton concedes there is no evidence of any tampering that would warrant a recount
or lawsuit. See Elias, Listening and Responding To Calls for an Audit and Recount, MEDIUM,
archived at https://perma.cc/S45U-MWZ4.


44 posted on 12/01/2016 12:58:05 PM PST by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D. - What Would Jack Bauer Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Either she is an absolute airhead or she did it on purpose.

Or she hired incompetent lawyers. That's a lot more common than you think.


45 posted on 12/01/2016 1:02:13 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Bkmk


46 posted on 12/01/2016 1:03:07 PM PST by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Here’s the link to the thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3500300/posts?q=1&;page=51


47 posted on 12/01/2016 1:05:46 PM PST by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kozy
During the Florida recount in 2000 they used "the intent of the voter" as a way to count ballots with no vote for anyone as a vote for Gore.

So maybe Stein can argue that it was "the intent of the candidate" to have the petition notarized in the proper way.

48 posted on 12/01/2016 1:06:57 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Ummmm....

Michigan has been certified by BOC and SOS.
Stein’s efforts regarding “vote integrity” will not change anything.


49 posted on 12/01/2016 1:09:51 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

I love the final paragraph in this document:

“Many of these costs would be acceptable if Michigan law really did entitle Stein to a recount. But it does not. And there is no reason to rewrite Michigan election law to accommodate the conspiracy-minded requests of an ACKNOWLEDGED LOSER (bwah-hah-ha-hah!!!!!). The Board should therefore deny Stein’s recount petition.”


50 posted on 12/01/2016 1:11:46 PM PST by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle; Kozy; RightInTheMain; Behind Liberal Lines

I agree that she has to notarize it if the law requires it but due to the keen interest in this recount I doubt they will throw it out over a technicality. They will probably accept it with a condition that she submits her signature with a notary.


51 posted on 12/01/2016 1:14:07 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Photo I’d for notary


52 posted on 12/01/2016 1:14:50 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Photo I’d for notary


53 posted on 12/01/2016 1:15:02 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

That is from DecisionDesk. No one else is reporting that number.


54 posted on 12/01/2016 1:15:22 PM PST by PJBankard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

I love their whining. I hope they have reason to continue it until their deaths.


55 posted on 12/01/2016 1:15:54 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

“I am tired of the whining left though.”

+

The whining of the left is like the song of a thousand swans stuck on the track in front of the Trump Train.


56 posted on 12/01/2016 1:15:57 PM PST by pax_et_bonum (Never Forget the Seals of Extortion 17 - and God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PJBankard

Forgive me, the intent of my post was just to notify that person of that discussion going on elsewhere here and for no other purpose (not fear trolling or any other related thing).


57 posted on 12/01/2016 1:25:01 PM PST by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: struggle

All Stein has to do is find a friendly judge and the Trump motion will be rejected. Easy to find a like minded judge wanting a recount. Such judges can make law up on the fly.


58 posted on 12/01/2016 1:30:45 PM PST by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Regrettably, you’re probably right, unless after Monday they see PA revoke her court challenge.


59 posted on 12/01/2016 1:33:03 PM PST by struggle (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

thank you.


60 posted on 12/01/2016 1:37:57 PM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson