Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whom will Trump choose as Press Secretary? Kellyanne or Laura Ingraham
me | November 21, 2016 | me

Posted on 11/21/2016 8:29:38 PM PST by ruthles

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: MIchaelTArchangel

Agreed

I would like representatives of the House to show up and have them ask the Prez questions, afterall they are our representatives.


61 posted on 11/21/2016 10:07:06 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ruthles

Prefer Laura but Kellyanne would be fine.

I want Sarah Palin for press secretary. She would drive teh MSM batty if only for her mere presence. And they would HAVE to speak with her on a regular basis. It is like rubbing the Trump win in their noses every single press conference.

I would LOVE Sarah Palin for press secretary.


62 posted on 11/21/2016 10:13:40 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (The GOP will see the light, because Trump will make them feel the heat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OddLane
I would pick Michelle Malkin.


63 posted on 11/21/2016 10:16:53 PM PST by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldplayer

Michael Savage would be the most fun fantasy press secretary. He would give them fits.

He would also be the worst possible choice on earth.

The press secretary’s job is to give fair access to the president, but ALSO to communicate the president’s message and platform. Stay on message.

Savage cannot give anybody’s message but his own schizophrenic stream of consciousness. It would be highly entertaining but a serious impediment to Trump fulfilling his agenda.


64 posted on 11/21/2016 10:16:57 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (The GOP will see the light, because Trump will make them feel the heat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

You may be referring to this:

http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/donald_trump_to_michelle_malkin_you_were_born_stupid/

http://www.mediaite.com/online/donald-trump-trashes-michelle-malkin-on-twitter-youre-a-dummy-and-were-born-stupid/

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2015/11/18/we-asked-michelle-malkin-if-donald-trump-would-make-good-president-she-had-this-to-say/


65 posted on 11/21/2016 10:19:36 PM PST by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ruthles
Make it a threesome

Ann, Laura, and Milo.

They would tag team the Media and pound them into a quivering mass of goo !! ;-)

66 posted on 11/21/2016 10:35:18 PM PST by HP8753 (Live Free!!!! .............or don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

I like the idea of a media spokespeople team. The cost of such a team would be quite large. I wonder if the media would undermine this tactic by questioning its cost?


67 posted on 11/21/2016 10:45:10 PM PST by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: moovova
Yes, sadly, that seems to be the consensus opinion everywhere. It appears that Trump would be prosecuting his opponent and needs to heal the country, etc.

However, National Review (I think it was McCarthy) wrote an article last week that really looked at this issue in detail - not just Hillary, but others, such as Lynch, the IRS guy and others. The article raised the possibility of entangling Obama. It presented pros and cons, but in the end concluded, that for justice to be fair and fairly executed so there is no double standard, that it was important to appoint special prosecutors and allow the investigations to lead to wherever it goes.

There was a separate article a few days before that speculating on whether Obama would pardon Hillary. The writer seemed to suggest that Obama would want to do it, but ultimately will not since he does not want his legacy tarnished in that way.

68 posted on 11/21/2016 10:52:52 PM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Jackwagons need not apply.


69 posted on 11/21/2016 10:54:48 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dave W
Lynch, Holder and the cesspit of the DOJ need to be put away for both political and ethical reasons.

They've committed crimes, but they also serve as a reminder of Obama corruption.

Since Obama is going to be the de facto leader of the opposition for the next four years, he needs to be brought to heel.

70 posted on 11/21/2016 11:09:11 PM PST by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

That’s what I was thinking too! In his team of advisors any one of them could act as the press secretary for the day. If a particular major issue came up then that one person could maintain some consistency through the issue; or not. I agree; the way the presstitutes have acted during this election cycle there’s no reason to make it easy for the political press at all. Let them claw and work for it for a change.


71 posted on 11/21/2016 11:09:46 PM PST by Boomer ( On Jan. 20th we can party like WE HAVE a tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ruthles

Sarah Palin. Wouldn’t that be a hoot.


72 posted on 11/21/2016 11:42:13 PM PST by taxesareforever (Islam is an ideology. It is NOT a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

“fantasy press secretary” That’s a fun notion in itself.

Hasn’t this election been so much fun? . . . but only from the moment that Wisconsin, Michigan, and North Carolina were all called. Before that, I was dreading that our country was doomed. We might still be, but not without one last fight.

Go Trump! (from a former Cruz supporter)

BTW, the notion of Savage standing behind the podium and staying on point is as funny as him calling the lib media “vermin.”


73 posted on 11/22/2016 12:45:12 AM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ruthles

I got the feeling Kellyanne didn’t want it.


74 posted on 11/22/2016 1:07:08 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruthles

Don Rickles would be best PS ever.


75 posted on 11/22/2016 1:30:48 AM PST by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OddLane

I like Michelle Malkin, but, not unlike Ann Coulter, she can be a little acidic for this position. I love hearing both of them when they’re free to speak their minds, not having to worry about how they appear.

Laura, OTOH, can speak the truth, but with a little less acrimony. She was great when she diplomatically blasted little Juan the other night.


76 posted on 11/22/2016 3:38:16 AM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ruthles

Ms. Kelly Anne said on a Fox evening news show last night that she wants to take part in the Trump administration, but that she has 4 young children and will plan work with her children as her priority.


77 posted on 11/22/2016 4:42:54 AM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruthles

Ted Nugent:

Prime directive:

Have your way with the WH Press Corps.


78 posted on 11/22/2016 7:42:14 AM PST by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruthles

Diamond and Silk for sure!


79 posted on 11/22/2016 7:48:46 AM PST by Dogbert41 (All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OddLane

Well, it appears based on this morning’s news it is not going to happen. Not surprising since the press and the dems would have a field day ripping Trump to shreds over this. While I think investigations should go forward, his energy and Congress’ energy should be spent moving forward meaning getting rid of Obamacare, etc.


80 posted on 11/22/2016 8:10:26 AM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson