Posted on 09/29/2016 8:08:15 PM PDT by EinNYC
Hillary Clinton took the lead in five key battleground states following the first presidential debate, giving her a solid boost with just over five weeks until Election Day, according to a poll released Thursday.
Voters in the five states — Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Virginia — also declared Clinton the winner of the much-anticipated slugfest with Donald Trump, according to Public Policy Polling.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Bull. Crap.
They over sample Dems and go by Obama turnout numbers.
Hillary will be lucky to get 80% of the turnout 2008 and 2012.
Well if Trump had showed an ounce of preparation, it might have helped. He ruled the first 30 minutes, then collapsed for the remainder. There will be pain until the next debate.
This is at least the third time this has been posted today...the internals show this to be utterly B.S.
Read days ago that Trump was leading in Colorado, Florida, and North Carolina so I call BS on this
Pant load. Oversampled Dems
Horse shit.
The media is creating a narrative to support election fraud. Count on it. The global cabal will not be denied.
that poll was +11 democrat.
Conflicts with the report I saw on Fox this afternoon.
Judging by the violence and hatred spewed forth for all Trump supporters, While police have been known to stand by and watch, it’s not difficult to see why most people just keep their mouths shut and their heads down.
The difference in votes from the pollster tallies may be very different this time around. Third party candidates will probably be taking votes from the Dem side as well.
It’s PPP! First, they ask completely bs questions in their polls that would make Trump supporters hang up, like “which do you like more, bed bugs or Trump?” And they ask A LOT of them (20+).
Also, I’ll have to go dig it up, but there’s been proof back in August that they were involved in dncleaks like stuff and they were threatened they’d lose a bunch of money if they didn’t come up with “better polls”.
To the extent polls are true, you’re dealing with people who don’t understand big issues, can’t even analyze stupid issues. These people will allow America to be destoyed rather than vote for someone who didn’t pet a puppy twenty years ago.
It’s hard for anybody to be prepared to go against two debaters, and they both have extensive notes at the ready and you are only allowed to go by memory.
I do not buy it.
NY Post is the New Version of the Washington Compost.
Let me know if you find it.
Huh?
Trump has an event in Melbourne, FL - 15,000 people attend, 12,000 are turned away (over capacity), while Hillary can barely attract 300 people and Hillary is winning?
Seriously?
“....why anyone with an IQ over 7 would support Hillary Clinton for president.”
I was just talking with a guy who is planning to vote for her. In his case, he’s completely ignorant about her history, and politics in general, and he’s really just following the recommendation of a ultra libtard “friend” of his. As long as he will continue to get all the “free” stuff Hillary promises (disability- bogus claim, food stamps, and weekly doctors visits for the slightest made up illness) he will vote for her. I think he’s probably typical: ignorant, and as long as that “free” stuff keeps rolling in, they don’t care.
Rove?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.