Did Anyone Timecheck the Debate?

9/26/16 | originalbuckeye

[originalbuckeye]

Just wondering what the total time speaking/per candidate was. Sure seemed like Holt let Hillary drone on without any time checks.

[silverleaf]

Thanks for that

[Texas Fossil]

Do you think Holt understands that Trump will “Remember”?

hee hee hee

[Spirit of Liberty]

You ought to go read on Democratic Underground, then. They think Holt was in the tank for Trump.

[Joe Boucher]

That is the job of The RNC and DNC to agree to how the debates will go.
And the GOP Always is pathetic when it comes to fighting for a decent modrator instead of a dem schill.

[woodyinscc]

Nice deployment of the Straw man debate tactic. Although you failed again miserably

Nopardons does not fail. She calls it as she sees it. To question her bono fides, is a big mistake. She has been a staunch fighter for all the right issues, for a lot longer then you have been here. Back off.!

[Enlightened1]

LOL! Yeah keep drinking that DNC Kool-Aid.

She called young black men “Super Predators that need to be made to heel”. She really likes a KKK Grand Dragon Senator Byrd that still used the n word right before he died.

She is currrupt to the core, a habitual liar, pathological, a thief, and has zero accomplishments as a U.S. Senator and Secretary of State. She let a U.S. Ambassador get killed in Benghazi and has helped armed ISIS. Took bribes via pay to play, and even sold access to the Chinese dictator.

All she does is leave a path of death and destruction everywhere she goes.

[sport]

Their cadre is not letting up. They were out in force last night and were very active. Donald was not going to win. According to them, he was either bullying or beligerent or passive and docile. It was always what he did wrong, never what he did right from them. Never mind the fact that everything was stacked against him. Never mind that the entire farce was set up in advance to make him look inept and to make Hillary shine. In their minds, they are all experts and sages and they spend the first part of the morning responding to the phone calls from National Leaders all over the World seeking their advice. Those of his critics here that are married have at least one thing in common with their wife or husband. They are both in love with him or her. As they proudly make their, "Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ear, I am not here to praise Caesar, I am here to bury Caesar..." speech.

Donald, even with everything stacked against him, did an excellent job. He was supposed to implode, rant and rave, shake his fist and totally lose control of his emotions. He did neither of these. He stayed focused, poised, and in control. And in doing that, showed the World what Hillary, the Democrat Party, and the media actually are. What a disgusting, degenerate, deceptive, and treacherous bunch of reprobates that they are.

[originalbuckeye]

Bingo. Hillary was a smarmy cretin last night. It was all stacked against Trump and he didn’t explode. I hope someone in the Media recorded how much time each speaker had.......I suspect Hillary, with the fawning Lester in control, had a fair amount more time. And who is the next moderator?? Anyone??

[woodyinscc]

I realize all that. WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH NO PARDONS!

[Paleo Pete]

I find it interesting that you’re taking so much incoming over an honest opinion.

If I look at it from the point of view of the average low information voter, I have to back you up, it would seem Hillary won it.

I don’t like that, but I think you’re right. Trump seemed off his game, was sniffling a lot, I think he had...or has...a cold, and simply didn’t have a great night. He did well, but overall common opinion is going to be that she won it, or that he lost it.

Holt helped her a lot. She got more mic time, I could see that without timing it, he only tried to call time on her twice if I remember correctly, and tried to stop Trump several times. In Trump’s favor, he ignored Holt at least twice and I loved it. He didn’t ask her any tough questions, the only time I remember him interrupting her was to call time, twice I think, and repeatedly interrupted Trump.

Highly one sided, in Hillary’s favor, Holt did everything he could to help her win, and I think Trump held his own quite well against their tag teaming, and considering he was obviously under the weather but didn’t necessarily win it. They kept him on the defensive most of the night, and that was the biggest thing, people will see that as a loss no matter how well he actually did.

People can bash me too if they want, I don’t care, but I think you have been taking a lot of unfair incoming for simply posting an honest opinion. A discussion is fine, but all this unfair and biased bashing is not necessary.

[MinuteGal]

My summation of last night's heat-but-no-light, waste-of-time debacle between two inept debators is:

.....abysmal, dysmal, pass the Pepto Bysmol.

Leni

[ViLaLuz]

“If” she won on style it was only because she was well-rested, pampered and rehearsed, like a little hot house flower. Trump did look a little tired but that’s because he’s working hard campaigning. Clinton probably collapsed promptly after the debate and her drugs wore off.

[hoosiermama]

Only on style that is considered professional or achedemic debate rules. Not on content

[MortMan]

I find it quite interesting that there are a number of online articles about things that show Trump in a less than positive light, but none on the speaking time used by the candidates.

[nopardons]

I never said that you were the only poster, here, who said that Trump won, nor did I ever claim that you said that I was the only one saying that he didn't. Your abject lack of reading comprehension is only exceeded by your mordant lack of political understanding!

No "straw man argument" from me, but several from you, all in one teensy post. LOL

And as far as "failing" goes....you win the prize, for that, hands down.

[nopardons]

Many thanks for your post; much appreciated!

I am a HUGE Trump supporter, but unlike many posters here, I am also honest, blunt, and am able to not blind myself to reality. Trump needed more prep and Holt went far beyond Candy Crowley, in playing both opponent and moderator.

The whole point of these debates is to try to get those who haven't yet paid much to any attention, to see how "good" one or the other debater is/win them over.

For the "white glove" RINOS, Trump failed miserably.

For the LIVs, I'm thinking that it was split and that's being generous.

For the Millennials....WHO KNOWS...they're mostly nuts!

[nopardons]

BRAVA !

[politicianslie]

What is the dif between assault and battery and hate crime? The category is subjective and a terrible precedent therefore.

I thought the un-indicted criminal "won" the debate too. But when she said the only socialist/communist line to only raise the taxes on the RICH, she lost it.

When she lied again about the email Secretary of State scam, she lost it.

When she called us all racists, she lost it.

Practiced lines means she looked better but what she said makes me want to throw up. And we didn't even get to what may be the biggest problem the country will face: Muslim terrorist murders of innocent Americans at the hands of the Demorat Party.

I won't even vote for a Demorat for schoolboard

[politicianslie]

got Caught for doing it and not only had the FBI dismiss her

If you dust off your history books and look at Watergate, you will find the Attorney General and other peons like the FBI Dir do NOT make decisions like this without horsepower behind them.

Who bailed out Hillary and WHY?

In Watergate, the power behind the lawlessness of the peons was Nixon. In Hillarygate, it's Hussein Obama.

If you've been watching the headlines, you know Hussein Obama as using a pseudonym for his emails to Hillary which means HE KNEW that Hillary was using a non-government server. PROBLEM?

Hussein is up to his slimmy little neck in this too. So a deal was made with Hillary. Hussein would make two phone calls: FBI Dir and Att General were told there would be NO INDICTMENT.

Hillary's part is for future actions. She has said she will let into the US FIVE TIMES the number of peaceful Muslims Hussein has let in.

Why does Hussein Obama put up with so much criticism to let Muslims in at an insane rate AND break the law to fix things for Hillary's "pardon?"

The answer is very, very simple. His name is Hussein. He was raised in a Muslim county and his school records show he was a Muslim student.

Hussein, America's FIRST Muslim President, doesn't care about infidels. His allegiance is to Islam, not Americans. If you are still confused, do some searches and just look at headlines for the last few years which seem to make no sense. Plug in Hussein is working for Islam into the equations and it all comes out perfect.

[nopardons]

A "hater crime" is akin to the silly madeup group now called "Hispanics".

I was posting last night as to how I thought that many "undecided" and LIVs idiots saw the debate; not on content. Also, I was disappointed that Trump didn't manage to hit her back, on the many lies she told, when it was her turn. It wasn't his best night, but he wasn't awful.

She lost it all over the place and should have been refuted!Trump needs a similar line to what Reagan used: "THERE YOU GO AGAIN."!

Not only will I NEVER vote for a damned Dem, for anything, neither will I employ them, see them for professional business ( doctor, dentist, etc.!), nor have one for a friend!