Two long standing crime reporting programs.. then all of a sudden something happened to NCVS..

Bureau of Justice Statistics | Sept. 1, 2016

[WilliamofCarmichael]

"The U.S. Department of Justice administers two statistical programs to measure the magnitude, nature, and impact of crime in the nation: the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)" I think there's still a NCVS but where's that data? Table 42 in particular. I wish I knew what happened. Golly gee.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

I will post the contents below.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

If the Obama Administration and the MSM employees would be honest these postings would not be necessary. Crime is not mostly white on black.

See link immediately below. I've posted these Bureau of Justice Statistics and other federal crime data but these particular NCVS numbers need expanding; e.g., !5% of violent crime on blacks is by whites and 15% of violent crime on whites is by blacks. But what about the numbers? Fifteen percent of the number of white victims is a lot more that 15% of black victims. It would take a lot of blacks -- or at least some really hard working blacks -- to achieve those numbers.

Column 01 uses data from each year's NCVS Table 42 Crimes of violence to compute percentage that is black-on-white. Here's how: From the 2008 NCVS Table 42

Type of crime
and race of victim

Number of
single-offender
victimizations

Perceived race of offender

White only

2,788,600

Total	White	Black	Other	Not Available
100%	67.4	15.4	5.1	12

Black only

570,550

Total	White	Black	Other	Not Available
100%	15.9	64.7	7.3	12.2

15.4% of the 2,788,600 crimes of violence against whites were committed by blacks that's 429,444

15.9% of the 570,550 crimes of violence against blacks were committed by whites that's 90,717

Together that's 520,161 white-black violence.

429,444 divided by 520,161 is 82.56% of the time white-black interracial violence is black on white.

The Column 02 Rape/sexual assault percentages were developed similarly by limiting the computation to sexual violence between blacks and whites. The 0% some years for white on black indicates that there are statistical matters here such as too few cases to matter statistically. Keep in mind that these data are based upon an annual survey of 10s-of-thousands of crime victims not police or court records. See my comments about that in this FR thread Federal crime statistics are a rebuttal to the race-grievance industry lies.

Also if you go to the link see the new FBI National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data. There are no interracial crimes data (just race and numbers of victims and separately race and numbers of offenders) but as I noted there: a large number of fewer white offenders than white victims of violence and a large number of more black offenders than black victims of violence -- I think that's telling.

The table shows that of the total number of acts of violence involving whites and blacks only -- what percentage of that total was black violence against whites? I find this hard to believe but I do not believe that I am mistaken. See above.

Year
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Year

0 1
89.45%
89.40%
89.36%
84.35%
87.83%
87.24%
88.18%
82.32%
85.62%
88.17%
91.26%
85.31%
88.63%
82.56%
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?

0 2
92.80%
75.89%
100.00%
86.72%
100.00%
85.51%
88.63%
67.53%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?
suppressed?

• Criminal victimization in the United States, 1995 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1995
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 1996 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1996
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 1997 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1997
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 1998 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1998
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 1999 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1999
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 2000 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2000
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 2001 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2001
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 2002 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2002
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 2003 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2003
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 2004 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2004
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 2005 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2005
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 2006 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2006
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 2007 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2007
• Criminal victimization in the United States, 2008 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2008

[FreedomPoster]

Bfl

[SunTzuWu]

Bookmark.

[kearnyirish2]

Everything you need to know about crime stats can be determined by which groups avoid the areas of other certain groups...

[Islander7]

Designating certain byways as MLK Blvd, St, Ave, etc. is a public service.

[Whenifhow]

PING!!!

Article and comments

If the Obama Administration and the MSM employees would be honest these postings would not be necessary. Crime is not mostly white on black. See details at link.

Thanks, WilliamofCarmichael

[glock rocks]

Telling. Good analysis Michael. Thanks for the ping, Whenifhow.

[glock rocks]

Michael? William. Sorry, needs coffee.

I am Dyslexis of Borg. Your ass will be laminated.

[zeestephen]

Thanks for your hard work, William.

I came across some crime data last year that might interest you.

The FBI determines the race of murder offenders only for “cleared cases.”

“Cleared cases” are any murder case that has resulted in at least one charge of murder against at least one named defendant.

Here’s what the FBI does not tell you...

60% of Black murders do not result in a prosecution.

40% of Hispanic murders are not prosecuted.

Just 20% of white murders are not prosecuted.

Bottom Line...

Any data that is derived from the raw number of Black murder offenders is completely distorted by the huge number of Black murders that go unsolved.

[SauronOfMordor]

The widespread policy of “no snitching(or else)” in black neighborhoods mean that the FBI stats based on cleared crimes are likely highly underreporting black crime.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

Thanks.. and that reminded me of this (which I posted as part of the above referenced FR thread)

ILLEGAL ALIEN crime.

I wanted to use federal data and include ILLEGAL alien crime but as a very informative study (Effects of Illegal Immigration Upon Crime In the United States) pointed out

"[T]he United States government does not readily keep statistics with regard to crimes committed by illegal immigrants. . . there exists a legal obligation [on federal agencies] . . . to report accurately [; e.g.,] the Office of Immigration Statistics, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, and the Government Accountability Office . . . the agencies [provide] raw statistical data with regard to incarcerations, criminal removals (deportations) and arrest information involving illegal immigrants [but as for data on] nationwide criminal prosecutions and convictions of illegal immigrants . . . no such information is kept and reported by the government . . . [in fact illegal alien crimes regularly result in] the criminal removal process rather than prosecuted with the intent to incarcerate them.

However the study did find that information about removal in lieu of prosecution and incarceration of illegal aliens can be seen in the

• Department of Homeland Security Office of Immigration Statistics’ Yearbook of Immigration Statistics and
• the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ Reports on Immigration Offenders in the Federal Criminal Justice System.

These provide raw statistical data because the statistics are broken down between criminal removals and non-criminal removals. Example: Table 41. ALIENS REMOVED BY CRIMINAL STATUS AND REGION AND COUNTRY OF NATIONALITY: FISCAL YEARS 2003 TO 2012

	Total	Criminal	Non- Criminal
2003	211,098	83,731	127,367
2004	240,665	92,380	148,285
2005	246,431	92,221	154,210
2006	280,974	98,490	182,484
2007	319,382	102,394	216,988
2008	359,795	105,266	254,529
2009	391,932	131,837	260,095
2010	383,031	169,656	213,375
2011	388,409	188,964	199,445
2012	419,384	199,445	219,939
2013	438,421	198,394	240,027

[kearnyirish2]

Yes; in nearby Paterson NJ they had some thug plead guilty to playing the knockout game on Rosa Parks Blvd.