FBI Source: We Failed America, Revealing Clinton Emails en mass Would Bring Down US government

Catholic Online ^ | 8/17/2016 | Tony Johnson

[Chgogal]

In case you missed it:
https://www.rt.com/business/356111-soros-fund-bearish-sp/

He is shorting the US Market.

[publius911]

If obama is proven to be the fraud and the criminal I suspect, his "pardons" won't be worth a bucketful of barf...

Why his entire life, his background, his educational records were allowed to be unilaterally "secret" should have set off genourmous alarm bells...

Whether he is merely a tool or a dupe doesn't much matter.

[publius911]

The thing is the GOPe is in on it too.

By definition....

[publius911]

Good-bye

[EarthResearcher333]

“So, why hasn’t Soros been tried for treason?”

Ask the British. He destroyed the Bank of England. Some felt it was treason.

Ask the French. Soro’s was convicted of insider trading crime in France.

Your “question premise” of a missing “after-the-fact” (i.e. been tried for treason) to imply the lack of existence “of-the-fact” (i.e. So, why..), denies the implicit existence “of-the-fact”.

The bigger question would be: Why a non-recommendation on an indictment on HRC?

[EarthResearcher333]

To: Baldwin77 cc:publius911

“So, why hasn’t Soros been tried for treason?”

Ask the British. He destroyed the Bank of England. Some felt it was treason.

Ask the French. Soro’s was convicted of insider trading crime in France.

Your “question premise” of a missing “after-the-fact” (i.e. been tried for treason) to imply the lack of existence “of-the-fact” (i.e. So, why..), denies the implicit existence “of-the-fact”.

The bigger question would be: Why a non-recommendation on an indictment on HRC?

[Enchante]

you’re pitiful, such a joke

[semimojo]

How do you pardon someone who has not been indicted, tried and convicted?

Allow me to be the first to say - ask Gerald Ford.

[rollo tomasi]

Because it's 4Chan (Taken with a grain of salt) and the "FBI" source was full of generalities that lacked specifics. Could be true, however again its 4chan.

Soros is obvious, pay-to-play is obvious (Well before the Clinton Foundation), destabilization in the Middle-East/positioning against Russia is obvious, deconstruction of the military is obvious, Clinton's intentions are obvious, agencies in the Fed. government working against the foundation/morality of the law is obvious, and government wishing to control our lives is obvious.

If you are implying that I am a "plant" from 2003 then your reasoning skills are really lacking. I just question everything I read, including sources that support our side.

Also the webpage was not scrubbed. The author of the OT does not know how 4chan operates. Here is an archive

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/tnum/79480356/

[rollo tomasi]

Sorry, here is the link

[mad_as_he$$]

AAhhh the good old days.

[PIF]

Det M & Det 4

[thinden]

bttt

[SgtHooper]

Understand. However, there needs to be a compromise to significantly reduce the possibility of agent deaths. But the misdeeds of the government should not be hidden. Clearly, the Senate oversight committees have failed us, since they fail to get or be told the real scoop as well. Should such information bring a government down, simply pull all agents and informants back and protect as much as possible. But the country comes first!!

[SaveFerris]

[ “If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire government is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of SAPs which would obliterate national security.” ]

Yikes. If ever this called for a Nully ping list, I’d say this does........

[SaveFerris]

Something was apparently very, very wrong. As we all know.

He looked scared in at least one of the pics I saw.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Cleaning my bookmarks and ran across this. Thought I would give it a bump. :-)