Posted on 08/02/2016 1:32:30 PM PDT by Wingy
Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers.
As we know, there are a number of ways to rig an election. Bev Harris, at blackboxvoting.org, is exploring a specific “cheat sheet” that has vast implications for the Trump vs. Hillary contest.
It’s a vote-counting system called GEMS. I urge you to dive into her multi-part series, Fraction Magic (Part-1 here). Here are key Harris quotes. They’re all shockers: “Our testing [of GEMS] shows that one vote can be counted 25 times, another only one one-thousandth of a time, effectively converting some votes to zero.”
“This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.”
“GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.”
“Instead of ‘1’ the vote is allowed to be 1/2, or 1+7/8, or any other value that is not a whole number.”
“Weighting a race [through the use of GEMS] removes the principle of ‘one person-one vote’ to allow some votes to be counted as less than one or more than one. Regardless of what the real votes are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes. Results can be controlled. For example, Candidate A can be assigned 44% of the votes, Candidate B 51%, and Candidate C the rest.”
“All evidence that [rigged] fractional values ever existed [in the GEMS system] can be removed instantly even from the underlying database using a setting in the GEMS data tables, in which case even instructing GEMS to show the [rigged] decimals will fail to reveal they were used.”
“Source code: Instructions to treat votes as decimal values instead of whole numbers [i.e., rigging] are inserted multiple times in the GEMS source code itself; thus, this feature cannot have been created by accident.”
A contact who, so far, apparently wishes to remain anonymous states the following about the history of the GEMS system:
“The Fractional vote [rigging] portion traces directly to Jeffrey W. Dean, whose wife was primary stockholder of the company that developed GEMS. He ran the company but was prohibited from handling money or checks due to a criminal conviction for computer fraud, for which he spent 4 years in prison. Almost immediately after being released from prison he was granted intimate access to elections data and large government contracts for ballot printing and ballot processing.”
I see no effort on the part of the federal government, state governments, or the mainstream press to investigate the GEMS system or respond to Bev Harris’ extensive analysis.
It’s not as if media outlets are unaware of her. From shesource.org, here is an excerpt from her bio:
“Harris has been referred to as ‘the godmother’ of the election reform movement. (Boston Globe). Vanity Fair magazine credits her with founding the movement to reform electronic voting. Time Magazine calls her book, Black Box Voting, ‘the bible’ of electronic voting… Harris’s investigations have led some to call her the ‘Erin Brockovich of elections.’ (Salon.com)… Harris has supervised five ‘hack demonstrations’ in the field, using real voting machines. These have been covered by the Associated Press, the Washington Post, and in formal reports by the United States General Accounting Office…”
So far, her analysis of GEMS seems to be labeled “too hot to handle.” Press outlets prefer to report the slinging of mud from both Presidential candidates’ camps. Meanwhile, the actual results of the coming elections—including Congressional races—appear to be up for grabs, depending on who controls GEMS.
Why would any vote be assigned a fractional value? All vote counting should be done in whole numbers.
I sure hope the Trump campaign staff are reading all these threads.
What the heck is this? Sounds like Common Core vote counting.
Why does everything need to be so complicated, other than to rig it?
Me too!
TRUMP’S FEARS OF A “RIGGED” ELECTION ARE REAL!
No question about it, this IS how the left HAS BEEN stealing elections for years! Some of us have been ranting about the KNOWN problems with the DIEBOLD devices used in Georgia for years. State officials HERE are conspicuously UNCONCERNED about the problem. If you read this post re. the nature of the problem, you’ll probably become ANGRY and see that it extends to a number of OTHER suppliers of such systems!
It seems the electronic revolution has rendered obsolete Uncle Joe Stalin’s cynically accurate remark that “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who COUNT the votes decide EVERYTHING.” These new devices can be programmed (aka RIGGED!) to produce a predetermined outcome without the “bother” of even COUNTING the ballots!
If you’re a fellow Trump supporter, we have ANOTHER problem this November: In varying degrees, the GOP establishment bosses and elites HATE Trump. He is a THREAT to their retention of power and future accumulation of the wealth (organizational AND PERSONAL) that power affords them. (Even GOP stalwart Newt Gingrich has correctly opined that Trump — in a reference to Christ’s rampage through the Temple — will “turn over the tables” in Washington.) The GOPe cannot allow that and a number of them have declared their support for Clinton.
The “problem”: If the vote fraud (aka “rigging”) throws the race to Clinton by a slim margin, HOW ASSIDUOUSLY WOULD GOP STATE AND LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS PROBE THE MATTER? Can you say “NOT VERY?”
Just be alert for it. If you smell a rat in YOUR state, RAISE HELL!
I agree -— votes should count in whole numbers. What the author is saying is that there is code already in the voting machines’ system that allows them to set the “value” of each vote to be counted -— therefore skewing the vote any way they want to.
I am surprised no one or no group has sued.
Ummm... Wouldn’t that be a 1.01 value bump for Hillary?
Somebody needs to be prosecuted most severely for this & then made to return to a system that works.
Obama is sputtering like a cheap motormouth.
From Bev Harris’s voting machine investigation website topic articles:
BlackBoxVoting.org
Black Box Voting, founded in 2003, is a nonpartisan investigative reporting and public education organization for elections.
exit-polls-vs-votes2
The truth about exit polls and vote counts: 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary
By Bev Harris | ACTIONS, RESEARCH | No Comments
Guest Author: Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.: [Updated July 20 to include full detail report] It has been widely noted that the unadjusted CNN exit polls for the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries, in many states, are at variance with the official results. Some believe the exit polls are accurate, and the official results are fraudulent. Others believe the exit polls are…
Read More
July 19, 2016
3
how-to-audit-an-election
What Constitutes an Election Audit
By Bev Harris | ACTIONS, RESEARCH, ROLE MODELS | No Comments
Guest Author – Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.: Ohio citizens conducted, under my direction, a genuine audit of the 2004 presidential election. This was no mere “spot check” of randomly selected precincts, and no mere “recount” of the same ballots previously run through the electronic tabulators. We learned to ask for everything: ballots, poll books, voter signature books, ballot accounting charts,…
Read More
July 19, 2016
3
fraction-magic-6
Fraction Magic – Part 6: Execution Capacity
By Bev Harris | COMPANIES, ELECTIONS INDUSTRY, MAKE AND MODEL, RESEARCH | 2 Comments
6 – Middlemen, Inside Access and Manipulation – A fractional voting framework is treacherous because it can be scaled to run across multiple jurisdictions very quickly. False results precisely mimic known patterns to appear plausible. In the demonstration we performed, Smith’s one-size-fits-all utility showed that a person without any programming skills at all could seize control of election results in…
Read More
June 14, 2016
10
fraction-magic-1
Fraction Magic – Part 1: Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers
By Bev Harris | COMPANIES, ELECTIONS INDUSTRY, MAKE AND MODEL, RESEARCH | No Comments
1 – Summary – This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting…
Read More
May 12, 2016
10
fraction-magic-2
Fraction Magic — Part 2: Context, Background, Deeper, Worse
By Bev Harris | COMPANIES, ELECTIONS INDUSTRY, MAKE AND MODEL, RESEARCH | No Comments
2 — Totals dropping mid-count; poll tapes don’t match; missing single-votes like round-off errors; e-mails from programmers; and voters being personally “weighted” for unequal value — In August 2014 Bennie Smith was approached by a number of candidates who insisted that their elections had been stolen. He disagreed with the group and offered to look into how the system works….
Read More
May 12, 2016
7
fraction-magic-3
Fraction Magic – Part 3: Proof of code
By Bev Harris | COMPANIES, ELECTIONS INDUSTRY, MAKE AND MODEL, RESEARCH | No Comments
3 – Programming to treat votes as decimals – The term “DOUBLE” means to store and process numbers with “double precision floating points” – in other words, to enable large numbers of decimal values. In contrast, the term “INT” instructs the program to treat numbers as whole integers. Source Code: Below are clips from GEMS source code showing that it…
Read More
May 12, 2016
6
fraction-magic-4
Fraction Magic – Part 4: Presidential race in an entire state switched in four seconds
By Bev Harris | COMPANIES, ELECTIONS INDUSTRY, MAKE AND MODEL, RESEARCH | No Comments
4 – Proof of Concept: Election Night Results – We used the GEMS fractional vote feature to alter an actual statewide vote database, rewriting all the polling place votes in the state of Alaska for the 2004 presidential election to change the outcome. This database was obtained by the Alaska Democratic Party in 2006 pursuant to a court order. Below is…
Read More
May 12, 2016
6
fraction-magic-5
Fraction Magic — Part 5: Masters of the Universe
By Bev Harris | COMPANIES, ELECTIONS INDUSTRY, MAKE AND MODEL, RESEARCH | No Comments
5 – Precision control to weight results – Using the GEMS “double” configuration, users can control election results using amazingly accurate vote percentages. We demonstrate this by assigning vote percentages using a children’s letter-number cipher. A=1, B=2, C=3, etc. For example, H=8 and A=1 so 81.8181% is “hahaha.” We helped Bush/Cheney dominate Alaska’s Cheney Lakes, assigning 38.514525% of the votes, spelling…
Read More
May 12, 2016
6
transparency-observable-chain-of-custody
About Chain of Custody
By Bev Harris | Uncategorized | No Comments
Elections chain of custody refers to physical and electronic evidence controls for: – who can vote – who did vote – actual ballots as marked by each voter, and – evidence transfer and storage Dispute resolution (recounts or litigation) and law enforcement measures need authentic evidentiary records. Proper accounting requires chain of custody measures, which auditors use to assess information…
Read More
February 14, 2016
3
1 2 3 … 6 Next »
NEW: Watch this section grow – Directories
ACCOUNTABILITY
— CHAIN OF CUSTODY
— ELECTION RECORDS
—— Records: ALTERED
—— Records: INACCURATE
—— Records: POLL TAPES
— ENFORCEMENT
— LAWS, RULES
— TRANSPARENCY
ACTIONS
— ROLE MODELS
— ADVOCACY
— ORGANIZING
— RESEARCH
— TECHNOLOGY
— ELECTION OBSERVATION
— MEDIA COVERAGE
BALLOTS
— BALLOT A PUBLIC RECORD
— BALLOT IMAGES
— BALLOT INCORRECT
— BALLOT IRREGULARITIES
— BALLOT MAILING
— BALLOT PRINTING
— BALLOT TAMPERING
— BALLOT TRACKING
— SECRET BALLOT
CAMPAIGN FINANCE
— DARK MONEY
— VIOLATIONS
CANDIDATES
— RIGHT TO RUN
— WRITE-IN CANDIDACY
— WHAT TO LOOK FOR
— WHAT TO ASK FOR
ELECTION COSTS
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
— RECOUNTS
— LITIGATION
DISTRICTING
ELECTIONS INDUSTRY
— COMPANIES
— HISTORY
— MAKE & MODEL
— PURCHASING
VOTING
- VOTING CATEGORIES:
-— ABSENTEE VOTING
-— EARLY VOTING
-— PROVISIONAL VOTING
-— POLLING PLACE VOTING
-— WRITE-IN VOTES
- VOTING COUNTS:
-— CENTRAL COUNT
-— PRECINCT COUNT
- VOTING MACHINES:
-— PROBLEMS
-— TECHNICAL INFORMATION
-— TYPES
VOTER LISTS
— VOTER REGISTRATION
— VOTER CHECK-IN
— PARTICIPATION RECORDS
— LIST MAINTENANCE
PLACES
PEOPLE
About Black Box Voting!
Black Box Voting, founded in 2003, performs nonpartisan investigative reporting and public education for elections.
The independence of Black Box Voting comes from support through citizen donations — always needed and very much appreciated! Please take a moment to become a patron by setting up a much-needed monthly sponsorship — or make a very important single donation: Click HERE.
You may be wondering what the term “black box” means. A “black box” system is non-transparent; its functions are hidden from the public. Elections, of course, should not be black box systems.
Influential reporting by Black Box Voting is referenced worldwide. Here is a link to a free copy of the book, Black Box Voting: HERE. Author Bev Harris became known for groundbreaking work on electronic voting machines, which can remove transparency of the vote count; other important reporting pertains to voter lists, election chain of custody, transparency problems with absentee voting, election industry corporate governance, and financial accountability in elections.
Opaque, non-transparent voting can afflict voter lists, poll lists,vote counting and chain of custody; political finance can also be “black box.” The road to better transparency begins with knowledge and public, grassroots dedication. I am glad you are here!
Bev Harris
BlackBoxVoting.org
Contact information: 206-335-7747
MEDIA INQUIRIES: for immediate response please send TEXT message
PO Box 72 Carlsborg WA 98324
info@blackboxvoting.org
Recent Posts
The truth about exit polls and vote counts: 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary
What Constitutes an Election Audit
Fraction Magic – Part 6: Execution Capacity
Fraction Magic – Part 1: Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers
Fraction Magic — Part 2: Context, Background, Deeper, Worse
Fraction Magic – Part 3: Proof of code
Fraction Magic – Part 4: Presidential race in an entire state switched in four seconds
Fraction Magic — Part 5: Masters of the Universe
About Chain of Custody
Caucus Integrity 2016
© 2016 BlackBoxVoting.org. All Rights Reserved.
Concerning Vote Machine vulnerability for hacker vote count tampering, slowing or disabling electronic vote systems all together:
DEFCON August 2016 Agenda
Topic:
Trust, But Verify: Auditing Proprietary Digital Recording Election Systems
Robert J. Hansen, Researcher, ACCURATE
Abstract:
In 2006 the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) rid the country of lever voting machines and punchcard ballots, and gave the states enormous budgets for buying electronic voting machines. What’s still unresolved is how these electronic voting machines are going to be audited. Trying to keep track of many different vendors, each of which has many different machines, is like getting lost in a funhouse hall of mirrors. Yet, there is good news. The National Science Foundation has established a research group for electronic voting, ACCURATE. In this presentation, an ACCURATE researcher will start talking about the thorny problem of making sure voting machines are playing fair. Existing technologies, both proprietary and open source, will be criticized; and new technologies will be presented.
Bio:
Robert J. Hansen has a Bachelor of Arts in Computer Science, Cornell College, 1998. Master of Computer Science, the University of Iowa, 2006. Chief Security Geek for Yomu Inc., 2000. Cryptographic Engineer for PGP Security, 2000-2001. Student at the University of Iowa pursuing a Ph.D. in computer security, 2002-present.
https://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-14/dc-14-speakers.html
It’s an undeniable certainty that hillary’s people will cheat. It’s only a matter of how much and will they get away with it.
Let’s hope The Donald’s people are on top of this.
Riddle me this. If the vote counting is controlled by evil (Globalist) forces, how did Trump crush the opposition ( Globalists) in the primaries? These are the same machines we use in the general.
Me too.
Again, who decides what "fair" is?
Good question, plus I know that “GEMS” (from ES&S) has been in use at the Fresno County (CA) elections department since at least 1982 when I first started working on the technical end of election returns for a local TV station. Solidly “red” county since then so if anything “GEMS” is “fixing” it for the GOP! ;-) In addition Fresno Co. uses “bubble type” paper ballots (i.e. “scantron”) that can be easily audited against the vote totals reported by GEMS.
http://www.essvote.com/products/7/39/Election-Management-Software/gems/
Gee, I don't know. Maybe because Trump was going to implode half way through. That WAS the prevailing wisdom during the Fall, Winter and Spring. Maybe because Trump was the opponent Hillary wanted to run against? Maybe she was scared of Jeb! or Christy, or Cruz? Maybe because Trump gets paid off to lose? But if what the article says is true, than the system WAS rigged....for Trump. Knock off all the serious candidates than have Trump blow up. I don't know. What do you think?
Btw. While not my first choice, I WILL be voting for Trump.
Yep, you’re right!!! That’s what I get for thinking faster than I type.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.