GOP insiders: Trump nailed it

Politico ^ | 7/22/2016 | Steven Shepard

[jmaroneps37]

I give the speech an A and the “insiders” a D

[Bayou Dittohead]

I believe the election will boiled down to this question “Is Trump risky?”. When that is answered “ no” she will suffer the fate of Carter. It is the question libs asked of Reagan.

[karnage]

Well said!

[papertyger]

They are fishing for something negative to say about an excellent convention. Who watches these has beens?

I was pleasantly surprised to enjoy CSPAN's coverage. Didn't miss pundits "looking for a problem to have," one bit.

[ichabod1]

Yeah, in Austin they have a saying “keep Austin weird.” Nearby rivals Texas A&M (many of who’s students are from Austin) came up with a counter slogan, “Make Austin Normal,” and I adapted it for the national scale.

[RayChuang88]

I believe the election will boiled down to this question “Is Trump risky?”.

Shouldn't we be asking this in regards to Hillary Clinton? I think given the innumerable ISIS-inspired terrorist attacks, then the answer is an emphatic YES!!

[StAnDeliver]

"The key is just how many people are really out there that haven’t already decided who to vote for and haven’t already been convinced and told who to vote for by the liberal media."

He already leads indies by a gabillion. A convention speech is meant to bring home your primary opponents. Or in Tedlim's case, humble him and bring him to heel - in a historic way - by letting him autoflame himself...

[StAnDeliver]

"I believe the election will boiled down to this question “Is Trump risky?”."

That was 2012. Do we rehire Bobo, or is Bishop Dullard risky? That was answered by Mr. 47%'s hoof-in-mouth disease.

This is a wave election, and thus it pivots on Cankles: "Will the status quo do?" for a Bobo 3rd term. That answer is resoundingly NO. If Michael Moore knows it, EVERYBODY knows it.