What happened, get zotted for something?
you and your Tenured Types are making me reconsider.
I must be He-Man.. I HAVE THE POWER!
Does it suck to be so weak that a few words can harm you?
Welcome to FR, Homes.
Posted on 07/02/2016 2:02:58 PM PDT by affan76
“Laying out in plain sight? Or “plausible” deniability for what she sold treasonously?”
What she did is plain as day to anyone who honestly informs themselves of her activities over the last five years.
She and Slick made millions in influence peddling and hidden access to our national security secrets. They both deserve to be hung by the neck for treason.
Hillary should have been ‘toast’ a long time ago. We can at least hope that this will end her political ambitions.
BumbleHummer gets excited easily.
It isn’t worth responding to.
you and your Tenured Types are making me reconsider.
I must be He-Man.. I HAVE THE POWER!
Does it suck to be so weak that a few words can harm you?
Welcome to FR, Homes.
Note also that this crap has been moved to chat.
Not news.
Gosh. I guess old BumbleHummer was right.
she ain’t gonna get charged. the fix is in, has been for some time. there is no justice anymore, prosecution is only for the little people and republicans. we have become a banana republic
++++
Congratulations for delivering the 100,000th post declaring with absolute certainty that Hillory Clinton will not be charged. Like the previous 99,999 this post represents noise in another otherwise interesting topic.
Sorry to pick on you so hard but we have had enough “She will skate” comments around here to last a lifetime. Your point may in fact be true. I hope it isn’t but being reminded of that possibility hundreds of times a day is simply boring.
Why don’t we spend a little time looking at either the case that she will be charged or, at the minimum, what the damage to both our institutions and the Democrat a Party will be if she isn’t.
The witch needs a blindfold and a cigarette.
I’ll let her have the blindfold but the cigarette could negatively affect the health of the firing squad.
“shut-in”
Har!
Thanks, newbie.
I was able to hear the faint audio from the SS Guy’s phone stationed outside Loretta’s plane. I remember some of it.
Lynch: I know why you’re here, Mr. President, and this is most unseemly.
Slick: Hey, Loretta, hear me out...
Lynch: The appearance of impropriety is so big that I might have to recuse! You’d be better off with me deciding your wife’s fate than an independent prosecutor! I’m going to have to ask you to leave.
Slick: Aw, damn, Ah’m not here about Hillary! You can do what you want with her! Ah’m here just to remahnd you who got you to this position, heh heh, and to show you these pics of mah grand babies, and to have y’all keep those emails themselves out of any evidentiary discovery, if you could. The Clinton Foundation will be much appreciative...
Lynch: You mean you’re NOT here to plead Hillary’s email case?
Slick: HELL no! She gets what she gets! Let justice be served, heh hehe. Ah had a lovely time chattin’ with you. Whah, you’re not at all as depressed as your stepdaughter says. She’s been tellin’ people the pressure of the job has been gettin’ to ya, that you’ve confided you don’t know if you can take any more.... But she might be mistaken, if you know what Ah mean... Have a lovely day.
we have been led by the nose for years about how legal prosecution of the clintons is imminent, they really did it this time, they’re finally gonna pay, smoking gun, etc..and nothing has ever been done. what makes this time any different? the democrat controlled fbi (remember it was her hubby that compromised the fbi during his admin, these guys aren’t pure) being involved?
the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. ain’t nothing gonna happen to her
Occam’s Razor. The simplest explanation is that Bill went over to Loretta’s plane to borrow a cup of sugar. ;-)
>>A stand-alone vanity isn’t news.
>>It’s an opinion.
>>Placement is the key.
But, it’s in General/Chat. Did it get moved here from News/Activism? And doesn’t News/Activism cover some pretty broad ground that could include a FReeper figuring something out?
Yes, it was moved.
It was originally in News.
Good.
More likely they were explaining to him that they couldn’t complete the circus of the faux investigation without “interrogating” her. They need to put forth all the appearances before they do nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.