Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Look at Thomas Jefferson's Egregious Hypocrisy
Scientific American ^ | 7/1 | John Horgan

Posted on 07/01/2016 8:18:53 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue

I once admired Jefferson, seeing him as an essentially good, no, great man with one tragic flaw: The writer of the inspiring words “all men are created equal” owned slaves. Now, I see Jefferson as an egregious hypocrite, who willfully betrayed the ideals he espoused.

I reached this conclusion only after visiting Monticello, Jefferson’s famous Virginia estate, last month. Previously, I didn't realize the extent of Jefferson’s slave ownership, and I lazily—and ignorantly--excused it as a common ethical blind spot of his time.

*Jefferson often denounced slavery. He wrote in 1774, "The abolition of domestic slavery is the great object of desire in those colonies where it was unhappily introduced in their infant state.” Yet over the course of his life he owned a total of 600 slaves, who worked on his Monticello farm and other holdings.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.scientificamerican.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: abolition; abolitionist; abolitionists; billofrights; constitution; declaration; garbage; johnhorgan; kissmyass; liberalagenda; monticello; scientificamerican; thomasjefferson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: TangledUpInBlue

What’s the real motive for all of the heavy scrutinizing of our founding fathers? The scrutinizers ought to be focused on the Clintons and the Obamas because they would have the ability, however involuntary, to answer to some well-deserved scrutiny.


21 posted on 07/01/2016 8:40:13 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue
But an insulting piece by a confused writer. Jefferson's recital of self-evident truths in the Declaration was never intended as a call for Egalitarianism. What the writer quotes was intended to justify the compact theory of Government, and the purpose in forming a Government. Jefferson was, among other foundational concerns, refuting the concept of the "Divine Right of Kings."

For a more detailed response, see Declaration Of Independence--With Study Guide.

The writer is endeavoring to tear down Jefferson, and others of the Founding Fathers, because he like Jefferson, Madison and many of the others, is critical of the labor system at that time in America, and thoughout much of history world-wide. Recognizing flaws in a system, does not translate into determining how to correct those flaws.

The current obsession with slavery in America reflects a deliberate effort to disparage our heritage. That it is seldom put in context; virtually never put in the perspective of being similar to what existed and was accepted in Biblical times, and from Biblical times onward; never, discussed in the context of how much more humanely the system was administered in America, as compared to other places in the world at the same time or over the millennia, etc., all tell us that it is not genuine analysis, but a deliberate effort to disparage the greatest generation of Americans.

22 posted on 07/01/2016 8:40:17 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy; All
I used to love reading it, but I abandoned it about two decades ago. Even back then, it was losing its way.

Very similar to Time, Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report, National Geographic, Popular Mechanics, etc. etc. etc.; they suck, all of them. I do like Astronomy, it is still pretty good.
23 posted on 07/01/2016 8:43:05 AM PDT by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Scientific American used to be a decent publication years ago. These days it’s just one more liberal propaganda rag.


24 posted on 07/01/2016 8:44:12 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JT Hatter

Yes, he is an unhinged Liberal liar. SA comes to our house from the last owners, it hits the mailbox and within 1 minute it hits the garbage.


25 posted on 07/01/2016 8:46:15 AM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

President Grant want to annex the island of Santo Domingo and make it a refuge for American blacks, but of course that never happened. I wonder if too many whites still wanted their labor, and that is why more was not done to give them the option to get away from white society and settle on the Western frontier.


26 posted on 07/01/2016 8:46:51 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears; notdownwidems

First off, I detest Scientific American. I had an ongoing subscription for many years, and they jumped on the AGW bandwagon early on, among other things.

Secondly, it really irritates me when pompous crapholes like this author want to apply the mores of today to people who lived hundreds of years ago, and doing it in a vacuum, no less.


27 posted on 07/01/2016 8:46:53 AM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue; Pharmboy; Doctor Raoul; indcons; Chani; thefactor; blam; aculeus; ELS; ...
The RevWar/Colonial History/General Washington ping list.

Please FreepMail me if you want to be added or removed from this low volume ping list. Ping requests gladly accepted.

Recessional of the Sons of the American Revolution:
“Until we meet again, let us remember our obligations to our
forefathers who gave us our Constitution, the Bill of Rights,
an independent Supreme Court and a nation of free men.”

As an aside, I just happen to be reading Ketchum's "Victory at Yorktown" and TJ did a lousy job as Virginia Governor preparing his state's militia for the battles swirling around it.

28 posted on 07/01/2016 8:47:40 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (JFK Wanted To Send Man To Moon - Obama Wants To Send Man To Ladies Room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan

Good post.


29 posted on 07/01/2016 8:48:12 AM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy

[ How is this a Scientific American article? ]

This whole article is akin to calling Sir Issac Newton a blithering idiot because he couldn’t figure out the theory of relativity....

They fail to mention that the slavery system was SET UP by the British when they setup the BRITISH COLONIES, and it took a while and lot of American blood to eventually unwind it.

If anyone can SHARE a large part of the blame of the “Original American Sin” it is the BRITISH!

Funny how these idiot political ideological slanted science nerds can excuse other cultural sins if they are located ELSEWHERE in the world, but if that sin is in OUR OWN country but located ELSEWHEN, the prospect of excusing it using the academia tool of “Cultural Relativism” becomes an impossible task.


30 posted on 07/01/2016 8:48:24 AM PDT by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Why confuse today with 240 years ago when a self-hating Liberal white guy can write bullshit about how he despises his own country. Where are all the uplifting stories from Tehran or Mogidiahu?


31 posted on 07/01/2016 8:49:19 AM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

Okay—and lets not forget that there were a significant number of BLACK slave owners here in the US as well. As I’ve heard it, Jefferson could not have freed his slaves if he wanted to due to prevailing laws at the time.

What I find most interesting, having read early works on Lincoln and Jefferson’s biography is that neither man thought that the slaves, once freed, should remain in the US. They did not believe that constructive integration was possible. Instead, they believed in repatriating the slaves to their original homelands. These books are available for the e-readers, and are uncensored by contemporary, politically-correct censorship. They are free, and well worth a look. Frederick Douglass’s and Booker T. Washington’s autobiographies are available as well, and also worth the read.


32 posted on 07/01/2016 8:51:17 AM PDT by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Revisionist Yankee bandwagon drivel


33 posted on 07/01/2016 8:52:09 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy; notdownwidems; Opinionated Blowhard; JT Hatter; Fiddlstix

Unscientific UnAmerican.


34 posted on 07/01/2016 8:53:24 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

This author is ignorant of the details involved at the time.

Slaves could not be paid or taught to read or educated in any way, so they were in fact, completely helpless.

These were not random, faceless black people to him. Jefferson grew up with them, played with them as a child and knew every one personally and felt his responsibility fully.

He did what he could. He knew the Constitution virtually guaranteed the civil eventually and that change would come.

This kind of gratuitous attack burns my butt.


35 posted on 07/01/2016 8:53:33 AM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

Yes, interesting in the unbounded arrogance of the writer.

I recommend tweeting this a-hole and giving him a history lesson:

https://twitter.com/@Horganism


36 posted on 07/01/2016 8:54:19 AM PDT by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

The modern day man and his touchy feelings. Very sissy.


37 posted on 07/01/2016 8:54:48 AM PDT by Carry me back (Cut the feds by 90%9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Scientific American is no longer either scientific or American - hasn’t been for a long time.

It’s just another leftist propaganda rag.


38 posted on 07/01/2016 8:56:25 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

I agree, only without paying them.


39 posted on 07/01/2016 8:56:38 AM PDT by Carry me back (Cut the feds by 90%9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Da Bilge Troll

Not to mention the fact that I believe I’ve read that Jefferson had no ability to free his slaves because he actually didn’t own them outright.

They were mortgaged chattel. He had no right to let them go. A major point missed by the author.


40 posted on 07/01/2016 8:57:25 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson