Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did They Attack Us At Benghazi?
blueunicorn6 | 5/12/2016 | blueunicorn6

Posted on 05/12/2016 8:53:20 AM PDT by blueunicorn6

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
The two Navy SEALs showing up at the compound disrupted the kidnapping attempt. They had no knowledge of this kidnapping attempt.

Mohammed Morsi's #1 CAMPAIGN PLEDGE TO EGYPT was getting the Blind Sheik released. This is a HUGE clue and often overlooked.

41 posted on 05/12/2016 10:10:52 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

I believe they used the cans of diesel in the compound that were there for the US vehicles.

Where was the door opening equipment?


42 posted on 05/12/2016 10:11:11 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Oh yeah and you can BET Hillary planned this with Morsi.


43 posted on 05/12/2016 10:11:49 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

The General giSt of the Benghazi operation was to knock off the Assad on the cheap; this CIA operation had no Congressional approval, no Congressional funding, which is the best way if you want to keep it quiet and have no leaks.

Khaddafi’s mostly unguarded arsenal would finance knocking off Assad.

Khaddafi’s Arsenal made especially good sense because after Reagan bombings of Tripoli and Benghazi, khaddafi had a very strong and healthy respect for American airpower, so he had been on a decade-long manpads buying binge, and that was one weapon type that the CIA was especially interested in procuring for free.

Benghazi was essentially a manpads acquisition and quality control operation for rebel proxies in syria.

this meant that events in far away Benghazi were affecting Russian and Iranian interests in Syria.

after awhile this International arms smuggling ratline became known.

Russia’s only access to the Mediterranean is in Syria which is its client State as well as that of Iran, so naturally both Russia and Iran had very good reason to resent American clandestine activity in Benghazi.

the attack on the compound was financing arranged by Iran and Russia.

This Thread started out with the question why did Benghazi get attacked, and that is the reason why.


44 posted on 05/12/2016 10:18:17 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

my own belief is that that the weapons used in the nerve gas attack in Syria 3 years ago probably came from Gaddafi’s unguarded Arsenal, which did include chem weapons.

I don’t know if those chem weapons went through Benghazi, but the idea that that attack was a Russian chem attack is ridiculous.

the chem attack was from our Rebel friends, who were waist-deep in Khaddafi’s weapons.


45 posted on 05/12/2016 10:24:34 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

To release the Blind Sheikh


46 posted on 05/12/2016 10:33:40 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Why attack the State Department compound, then?


47 posted on 05/12/2016 10:37:56 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

There were Marines...

in Barbados
http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/on-91112-there-was-a-marine-detachment-in-barbados-but-not-benghazi/


48 posted on 05/12/2016 10:38:16 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Why “fake” it? What would be the point? It wouldn’t sell to other Arabs, they would think it was normal to leave an infidel to die. To impress us somehow? They are terrorists. It isn’t “terrifying” to rush someone to the hospital. And, again, they didn’t take Sean Smith to the hospital. So why Stevens but not Smith? And there is doubt about whether Stevens was dead or not. Some of the Libyans who took him to the hospital claim he was alive and a doctor at the hospital said he did CPR for 90 minutes on the ambassador. 90 minutes! Think about that. Who does CPR for 90 minutes on a patient who has suffered severe smoke inhalation? So why the extra effort? They wanted him alive.

They faked a video. They planted a story that Stephens was 'gay', on September 12th. Why not plant the notion this was about taking Stevens prisoner? What happened was what was planned. By the way any reports of who got Libya's gold?

49 posted on 05/12/2016 10:42:43 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

I meant why would the Libyans on the ground fake caring enough to take a dead man to the hospital?

If the Libyans didn’t care whether he lived or not, why do it? Why announce that they did CPR on him for 90 minutes?

If Stevens wasn’t the target, why did they go through so much effort to try and keep him alive?


50 posted on 05/12/2016 10:51:45 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
I meant why would the Libyans on the ground fake caring enough to take a dead man to the hospital? If the Libyans didn’t care whether he lived or not, why do it? Why announce that they did CPR on him for 90 minutes? If Stevens wasn’t the target, why did they go through so much effort to try and keep him alive?

Why do CPR on a dead man for 90 minutes? Stevens was the guy with all the 'secrets'. Dead men tell no tales.

51 posted on 05/12/2016 11:16:36 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Hill and her boss taking Libyan arms and shipping em to Syrians against the dentist.
Illegally.


52 posted on 05/12/2016 11:24:02 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (500 years ago we had Shakesphere, obammys people live in mud huts still. Go figure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Don’t forget that ‘gold’.


53 posted on 05/12/2016 11:29:39 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

It was a video on Youtube. Nothing more to see here. Move along.

/s


54 posted on 05/12/2016 12:02:43 PM PDT by al_c (Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
...when I'd never heard of the place before.

Never played Afrika Korps?

55 posted on 05/12/2016 12:09:08 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
... fake caring enough ...

Optics.

Same reason the LSM hides the videos of Palis cheering the twin towers collapsing, and proudly disseminating HIV+ Arafat "giving" blood.

56 posted on 05/12/2016 12:18:08 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

You are looking at it from the U.S. administration point of view, which only tells one half of the story.

When you look at it from the Libyan attackers point of view, it opens up a lot more answers.

If they (the Libyan attackers) were trying to free Omar Abdel-Rahman in a prisoner transfer, then the ambassador (taken alive) would have been their best option.

And we know that freeing Abdel-Rahman is a major goal of many terrorists, especially those associated with Egypt.

If that is the reason they went there, to grab Stevens to trade him for Abdel-Rahman, then everything the Libyans did after the attack (i.e. taking Stevens to the hospital, trying CPR for 90 minutes) makes sense.

Without that motivation on the part of the Libyans, none of that makes sense. None of it.


57 posted on 05/12/2016 1:06:43 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

Optics for who?

As you assert, the Media is the one hiding bad Arab acting. But this isn’t Arabs acting bad that the media is trying to hide, this is Arabs acting “good”.

But why would they act good? They don’t want to be seen as helping the U.S. to other Arabs, and they certainly don’t think that taking the man they just attacked to the hospital will provide good optics.

They wanted Stevens alive. It’s the only answer that makes sense.


58 posted on 05/12/2016 1:09:29 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
You are looking at it from the U.S. administration point of view, which only tells one half of the story. When you look at it from the Libyan attackers point of view, it opens up a lot more answers. If they (the Libyan attackers) were trying to free Omar Abdel-Rahman in a prisoner transfer, then the ambassador (taken alive) would have been their best option. And we know that freeing Abdel-Rahman is a major goal of many terrorists, especially those associated with Egypt. If that is the reason they went there, to grab Stevens to trade him for Abdel-Rahman, then everything the Libyans did after the attack (i.e. taking Stevens to the hospital, trying CPR for 90 minutes) makes sense. Without that motivation on the part of the Libyans, none of that makes sense. None of it.

I am looking at the verifiable facts. At the time of Stevens death, Libya was under Hillry's control. AND so far there is no reason to believe anything other than 4 Americans were slaughtered, and all the weapons, gold and 'intel' was taken by unnamed 'workers'. NOT one outside of Libya responded to aide our peoples, and I considered that calculated prior. Thus far, I consider it chatter that there was a legitimate plan in place to take alive Stevens. Nothing else points in that direction.

59 posted on 05/12/2016 1:13:51 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

If it was just to get Stevens, then why attack the CIA complex?


60 posted on 05/12/2016 1:19:57 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson