Posted on 05/11/2016 10:42:40 PM PDT by MaxistheBest
Just for info, she isn’t a cancer patient. It was an elective surgery because she has the gene, which makes no sense to me.
She's saying the hair is flat-chested, red-dressed, and over-sprayed bleach blonde. That doesn't make much sense.
This is her “New York values” moment. It’s all over for her, unless she makes a large public apology and also does a special on the breast cancer gene and the prevention mastectomy strategy. Get busy, Dana Loesch.
Used to like Dana but she now has an ugliness that is repulsive. Her hatred for anyone who doesn’t like Cruz is palpable. Can’t bear to look at her any more and I truly thought she was beautiful in the past.
Could it be some kind of demons? I truly wonder.
What? She isn’t black.
With regard to the handicapped, I have not researched that issue. With regard to women, the media's claims of bias are ludicrous and false. Trump has been a champion of women's advancement in business since the 1970s, when no one else was doing so.
What’s up with Donald Trump and ‘the women’? Not what you might think. [not at all sexist]
The Trump Family—From a [female] Trump Employee’s Point of View
Ivanka Trump Discusses How Her Father Empowers Strong Women
Latest from WI. exit polls Trump did as good with women as men
New poll shows Trump is winning battle for women against Clinton
Women #DefendDonald "What the media won't tell you."
As for the story about the veterans' charities, again: several openly anti-Trump sites rushed a false narrative to print in the weeks after the fundraiser, wailing that some organizations had not received funds. But if you had actually read the articles, you might have seen the clear biases and in-your-face bad reporting. Even left-leaning Snopes has grudgingly rebutted the false narrative.
Yet you continue to trot out these canards, even after Jim Robinson has pled with the FR community several times to can the bickering, stop helping the opposition (Hillary) campaign by denigrating the presumptive candidate, and get behind the effort to support our side's candidate for the simple reason that failing to do so is a vote for Hillary and the failure of the United States and our Consitution:
President Hillary is totally unacceptable –Jim Robinson (895 replies)
[May 5] The Primary is over. Thank God and Hallelujah! –Jim Robinson
No one says you have to like Mr. Trump or even vote for him. But no less than Jim Robinson has asked you and all freepers to stop using FR to bash him. Given that your bash comments are unresearched talking points that you repeat, and given that due to your past good reputation at FR, I among others have taken the time to reply to you in detail in the past over your unfounded bashes and have received no constructive response, I am once again and for the last time calling you out on the public forum.
Please read JimRob's reasoning in the links above and either accept the presumptive inevitability and get on the team, or sit this out. But as Jim says, "if you do not wish to be part of this effort, please sign off now."
Be careful with her Twitter lol. Dana is overly thin-skinned and blocks everyone on Twitter that offends her. I should know LOL
She is a rude FAKE......
Wow. I have now completely lost respect for Dana Loesch. That very personal attack on Kayleigh (who is very good on CNN, when she gets a chance to speak) proves that Dana — like many other Sore Cruzers — has completely gone off the deep end.
I’ve heard about that...be interesting to watch.
Great cartoons!
I never heard of Loesch until sometime around 2009, just after the Tea Party movement started. How did she go from a lib to Tea Party “conservative” so fast??
I pray you get over this bad case of TDS very soon. It’s really unbecoming of a grown man and patriot and helps no one but Hillary.
nah , I still like Rush . He’ll come around . But ‘ fingernails-on-the-chaulkboard’ Levin is toast with me . His screachy vehemence has becoming sickening to me . Outrage without tangible solutions is asinine.
One of those “ooops” moments when you wish you hadn’t done an ad hominem attack on someone’s looks.
Keep it classy, dummy.
Angelina Jolie had the same surgery:
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/angelina-jolie-and-the-one-percent/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.